7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Dmitri and Frances are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Dmitri chooses Right and Frances chooses Right, Dmitri will receive a payoff of 7 and Frances will receive a payoff of 6. Frances Left Right Left 4, 3 6, 4 Dmitri Right 6, 7 7, 6 to choose The only dominant strategy in this game is for and Frances chooses The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Dmitri chooses

7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Dmitri and Frances are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Dmitri chooses Right and Frances chooses Right, Dmitri will receive a payoff of 7 and Frances will receive a payoff of 6. Frances Left Right Left 4, 3 6, 4 Dmitri Right 6, 7 7, 6 to choose The only dominant strategy in this game is for and Frances chooses The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Dmitri chooses

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Consider the following sequential move game of imperfect information. Consider the following sequential move game of imperfect information. In the event that Otis chooses Down, then they play the simultaneous move game shown in normal form (where Otis chooses between X and Y and Maeve simultaneously chooses between W and V). A (25,6) Maeve Up B (5,10) (12,5) Otis Middle Maeve Down w Otis (0, 0) (10, 10) Y (15, 15) (0, 0) Find all (pure strategy) subgame perfect Nash equilibria.
Let's think about a traditional game theory principal agent game. In this game we have two players, Lauren and Jason Lauren will choose to invest $500 dollars with Jason If she doesn't invest the money, she keeps the $500 and Jason gets nothing If she does invest the money, then Jason has a choice-he can cooperate by investing Lauren's money and then splitting the profit of another $500. This would give Lauren $750 (her original $500 investment plus $250 of profit) and would give Jason $250. Jason's other choice is to appropriate, or to steal Lauren's money and not invest it. If he does this, Lauren ends up with nothing and Jason has the entire $500. The following diagram outlines this game. Principal Agent Game Jason (750.250) Invest appropriate 10. 500) doninve What will happen in this game? Lauren will not invest Lauren will invest and Jason will cooperate Lauren will invest and Jason will appropriate Next page
7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Felix and Janet are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Felix chooses Right and Janet chooses Right, Felix will receive a payoff of 7 and Janet will receive a payoff of 4. Felix Left Right Left 6,3 3,3 Janet Right 6,4 7,4 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Felix chooses and Janet chooses
8. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Tim and Alyssa are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Tim chooses Right and Alyssa chooses Right, Tim will receive a payoff of 3 and Alyssa will receive a payoff of 6. Tim Left Left 5, 6 Right 4, 2 Alyssa Right 5,5 3,6 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Tim chooses and Alyssa chooses
Consider the following game. You will roll a fair, 6-sided die either once or twice. You decide whether to do the second roll after you see how the first one lands. The payoff is $n, where n is the outcome of the last roll. For example, if the first roll lands 4 and the second lands 2, you win $2. If you only do one roll and it lands 4, you win $4. Suppose you make your decision about whether to go for a second roll based on expected monetary value. Then you will go for a second roll if (and only if) the first roll lands x or lower. What is x?
7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Carlos and Deborah are playing a game in which both must simultaneously choose the action Left or Right. The payoff matrix that follows shows the payoff each person will earn as a function of both of their choices. For example, the lower-right cell shows that if Carlos chooses Right and Deborah chooses Right, Carlos will receive a payoff of 5 and Deborah will receive a payoff of 1. Carlos Deborah Left Left 4,4 Right 2,4 Right 6,7 5,1 The only dominant strategy in this game is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Carlos chooses and Deborah chooses
Player 2 Left P1: $40 Player 1 Up P2: $0 P1: $44 Down P2:$44 In the game shown above, list all of the EFFICIENT Nash Equilibrium (please check ALL that apply) (up, left) (up, right) (down, left) (down, right) No efficient Nash Equilibrium Right P1:$1 P2: $1 P1: $0 P2: $40
7. Solving for dominant strategies and the Nash equilibrium Suppose Russell and Aaliyah are playing a game that requires both to simultaneously choose an action: Up or Down. The payoff matrix that follows shows the earnings of each person as a function of both of their choices. For example, the upper-right cell shows that if Russell chooses Up and Aaliyah chooses Down, Russell will receive a payoff of 6 and Aaliyah will receive a payoff of 4. Russell Up Down Aaliyah Up 6,3 3,3 Down 6,4 7,4 In this game, the only dominant strategy is for to choose The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Russell chooses and Aaliyah chooses
!
Return to the game between Monica and Nancy in Exercise U10 in Chapter 5. Assume that Monica and Nancy choose their effort levels sequentially instead of simultaneously. Monica commits to her choice of effort level first. On observing this decision, Nancy commits to her own effort level. What is the subgame - perfect equilibrium of the game where the joint profits are 5m + 4n+ mn, the costs of their efforts to Monica and Nancy are m2 and n2, respectively, and Monica commits to an effort level first? Compare the payoffs to Monica and Nancy with those found in Exercise U10 in Chapter 5. Does this game have a first-mover or second - mover advantage? Using the same joint profit function as in part (a), find the subgame - perfect equilibrium for the game where Nancy must commit first to an effort level. U10. Return to the game between Monica and Nancy in Exercise U10 in Chapter 5. Assume that Monica and Nancy choose their effort levels sequentially instead of simultaneously. Monica commits…
The options for the last 3 fill-in-the-blanks are "Up" or "Down." Thank you!
Refer to Table Left-Right-ZigZag. How many pure strategy Nash equilibria does this game have? Table: Left-Right-ZigZag Player 1 Drive left Driver right Zigzag 1) 1 2) 2 3) 3 4) 4 5) None of the above. Drive left (1,1) (-1,-1) (0,0) Player 2 Driver right (-1,-1) (1,1) (0,0) Zigzag (0,0) (0,0) (0,0)