6. Battle of the Networks1\2 %shareSitcomSitcom48;52Sport42;58Nature55:4558;42Ans: s; = (0; 0.85; 0.14); V, = 55.43 s; = (0.43; 0.57;0); V½ = 44.5740;6063;3760;40SportNature56:4452;48Find Nash Equilibrium.

Nash equilibrium refers to the best possible of the both players after considering other player’s…

6. Battle of the Networks Sport 42;58 12 %share Sitcom Nature Sitcom 48;52 40;60 55:45 58;42 Ans: s; = (0; 0.85; 0.14); V, = 55.43 s; = (0.43; 0.57;0); V½ = 44.57 Sport Nature 56:44 52:48 63:37 60;40 %3D Find Nash Equilibrium.

6. Battle of the Networks Sport 42;58 12 %share Sitcom Nature Sitcom 48;52 40;60 55:45 58;42 Ans: s; = (0; 0.85; 0.14); V, = 55.43 s; = (0.43; 0.57;0); V½ = 44.57 Sport Nature 56:44 52:48 63:37 60;40 %3D Find Nash Equilibrium.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Two firms bid for a contract to build a university building. Their construction costs are independent and uniformly drawn from [0,1]: Both bidders submit their bids si- multaneously. The winner is the bidder who submits a lowest bid. Tie-breaking rule is random. This kind of bidding game is called i'reverse auction' because the bidders bid for the right to provide a service and the winner is paid for the service. The FCC in 2017 has adopted similar auctions designed to repurpose spectrum for new uses. (a) In the first auction, the winner gets paid the loser's bid. For example, if the winner's cost is 0.5, his bid is 0.56, and the loserís bid is 0.6, then the winner gets the contract and the university pays the winner 0.6. The winner's net profit from the contract is 0.6-0.5 = 0.1. Solve for a Bayesian Nash equilibrium of this auction. What is the equilibrium bid of a firm bid if his cost is actually 0.5? (b) In the second auction, the winner gets paid the his/her own winning…
c and d
5,3 4,4 3,6 7,6 Find the pure strategy nash equilibria
ITERATIVE DOMINANCE Consider the following game in strategic form. a₁ 22 a3 bi 35,52 30,30 28,9 (9,11) (45,47) (47,28) (52,16) (28,9) (30,30) (16,45) (11,35) (35,52) b2 11,35 9,11 16,45 b3 52,16 45,47 47,28 Which of the following payoff profiles survive iterative deletion of strictly dominated strategies? (Mark all profiles that survive.)
(J)
Consider the following normal-form game (a) Calculate the rationalizable set ? (b) Find all Nash equilibria. (c) Find all mixed-strategy Nash equilibria.
Typed plzzzzzz
Two rival companies competing in the same market need to decide their plans for future expansion of their stores. The Table below shows the possible outcomes of their mutually interdependent actions (payoffs are profits in £m) Giga Company Titanic Conglomerate No Change Refurbishment of existing stores Large Expansion No Change 30, 40 25, 35 15, 24 Refurbishment of existing stores 35, 30 28, 32 18, 33 Large Expansion 12, 22 18, 20 20, 25 The Nash equilibrium: (A) does not exist. (B) occurs when both firms choose Refurbishment of existing stores. (C) occurs when both firms choose Large Expansion. (D) occurs when both firms choose No Change.
3. 1 2 J K 2 1 2 0 0 K 3 3 E/ 1.1 2.2 B G 2 -2 a.) How many Subgames does this Game have? b.) Convert this Game Tree into matrix form. c.) Find all Pure Strategy Nash Equilibria of this Game. d.) Find all Subgame Perfect Nash Equilibria of this Game. (Pure and Mixed) 2 2.2
60B- What is the Nash equilibrium for this game and identify the profit each player gets at this solution 5 m
7
• When it comes to customs clearance of goods, customs officers and smugglers try to prevent the other party from predicting their respective intentions. Their respective profit metrics are as follows: • There is no general Nash equilibrium (pure strategv). • Question: What is the mixed strategy equilibrium? Customs Officer Inspect Free Pass (1-y) Cheat -50, 47 5, 0 (x) Smuggler Honest 0, -3 0,0 (1-x)