Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Business
Economics
5. (26 points) The following two equations were estimated using a sample of births for the year 2010. The variable bwght is birth weight, in ounces, faminc is annual family income, in thousands of dollars, cigs is number of cigarettes the mother smoked per day while pregnant, motheduc is mother's education (in years), and fatheduc is father's education (in years): log (bŵght) = 4.73+ 0.146 log( faminc) - (0.03) (0.076) n=1,191 R² = 0.264 0.031 cigs (0.016) (5.1) log (bŵght) = 4.73+ 0.136 log( faminc) - (0.03) (0.076) - 0.051 cigs (0.010) 0.040 motheduc+ 0.041 fatheduc (0.030) n=1,191 R² = 0.286 (0.026) (5.2) (a) In terms of the model parameters, (i) state the null hypothesis that, after controlling for faminc, motheduc, and fatheduc, cigs has no effect on birth weight against the alternative that cigs has a negative effect; and (ii) carry out the test at the 10% significance level (4 points). (b) Controlling for cigs, is faminc individually significant at the 1% level against a two- sided alternative? (4 points)

5. (26 points) The following two equations were estimated using a sample of births for the year 2010. The variable bwght is birth weight, in ounces, faminc is annual family income, in thousands of dollars, cigs is number of cigarettes the mother smoked per day while pregnant, motheduc is mother's education (in years), and fatheduc is father's education (in years): log (bŵght) = 4.73+ 0.146 log( faminc) - (0.03) (0.076) n=1,191 R² = 0.264 0.031 cigs (0.016) (5.1) log (bŵght) = 4.73+ 0.136 log( faminc) - (0.03) (0.076) - 0.051 cigs (0.010) 0.040 motheduc+ 0.041 fatheduc (0.030) n=1,191 R² = 0.286 (0.026) (5.2) (a) In terms of the model parameters, (i) state the null hypothesis that, after controlling for faminc, motheduc, and fatheduc, cigs has no effect on birth weight against the alternative that cigs has a negative effect; and (ii) carry out the test at the 10% significance level (4 points). (b) Controlling for cigs, is faminc individually significant at the 1% level against a two- sided alternative? (4 points)

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
See similar textbooks
icon
Related questions
Question
5. (26 points) The following two equations were estimated using a sample of births for the year 2010. The variable bwght is birth weight, in ounces, faminc is annual family income, in thousands of dollars, cigs is number of cigarettes the mother smoked per day while pregnant, motheduc is mother's education (in years), and fatheduc is father's education (in years): log (bŵght) = 4.73+ 0.146 log( faminc) - (0.03) (0.076) n=1,191 R² = 0.264 0.031 cigs (0.016) (5.1) log (bŵght) = 4.73+ 0.136 log( faminc) - (0.03) (0.076) - 0.051 cigs (0.010) 0.040 motheduc+ 0.041 fatheduc (0.030) n=1,191 R² = 0.286 (0.026) (5.2) (a) In terms of the model parameters, (i) state the null hypothesis that, after controlling for faminc, motheduc, and fatheduc, cigs has no effect on birth weight against the alternative that cigs has a negative effect; and (ii) carry out the test at the 10% significance level (4 points). (b) Controlling for cigs, is faminc individually significant at the 1% level against a two- sided alternative? (4 points)
Transcribed Image Text:5. (26 points) The following two equations were estimated using a sample of births for the year 2010. The variable bwght is birth weight, in ounces, faminc is annual family income, in thousands of dollars, cigs is number of cigarettes the mother smoked per day while pregnant, motheduc is mother's education (in years), and fatheduc is father's education (in years): log (bŵght) = 4.73+ 0.146 log( faminc) - (0.03) (0.076) n=1,191 R² = 0.264 0.031 cigs (0.016) (5.1) log (bŵght) = 4.73+ 0.136 log( faminc) - (0.03) (0.076) - 0.051 cigs (0.010) 0.040 motheduc+ 0.041 fatheduc (0.030) n=1,191 R² = 0.286 (0.026) (5.2) (a) In terms of the model parameters, (i) state the null hypothesis that, after controlling for faminc, motheduc, and fatheduc, cigs has no effect on birth weight against the alternative that cigs has a negative effect; and (ii) carry out the test at the 10% significance level (4 points). (b) Controlling for cigs, is faminc individually significant at the 1% level against a two- sided alternative? (4 points)
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
SEE MORE TEXTBOOKS