4. In business dealings in a small, isolated town, a given person can either behave like asaint or behave like a crook.SaintCrookSaint5,59,0Crook0,9-2,-2Given these payoffs, how often does a person play Saint in the mixed strategy Nashequilibrium? What are the expected payoffs in such an equilibrium?

According to the game theory decision-making theorem known as the nash equilibrium, a player can…

4. In business dealings in a small, isolated town, a given person can either behave like a saint or behave like a crook. Saint Crook Saint 5,5 0,9 9,0 Crook -2,-2 Given these payoffs, how often does a person play Saint in the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium? What are the expected payoffs in such an equilibrium?

4. In business dealings in a small, isolated town, a given person can either behave like a saint or behave like a crook. Saint Crook Saint 5,5 0,9 9,0 Crook -2,-2 Given these payoffs, how often does a person play Saint in the mixed strategy Nash equilibrium? What are the expected payoffs in such an equilibrium?

Microeconomics: Principles & Policy

14th Edition

ISBN:9781337794992

Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow

Publisher:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow

Chapter13: Between Competition And Monopoly

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 10DQ

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

2. Brad and Angelina have agreed to meet up for their first date. Neither of them can remember the exact location where they arranged to meet up and have forgotten their phones at home. Their payoff matrix can be described as follows: Brad The Hive Le Monde a) What is the Nash equilibrium in this game? Angelina The Hive 5; 5 0; 0 Le Monde 0; 0 5; 5
5. Aaron and Betty play the following one-shot game. Aaron Up Middle Down Left 10,0 5,10 1,1 Betty Right 0,5 1,0 2,2 a. Does the game above have any (pure strategy) Nash equilibria? Find any equilibria or explain why an equilibrium doesn't exist. b. Suppose instead that Aaron moves first and Betty moves second. Represent this situation with a game tree and find the subgame perfect Nash equilibrium. Are Aaron and Betty better off playing a simultaneous game or a sequential game in which Aaron moves first? Explain. c.
9.
3
P1 gets $45 Up P2 gets $150 ... Up P1 gets $100 Down P2 gets $100 Up P1 gets $95 Down P2 gets $95 P1 gets $15 Down P2 gets $25 Player 1 Player 2 In the game above, what is/are the EFFICIENT sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium? A (down, up) B NO EFFICIENT equilibrium exists C (up,down) D (down, down) E) (up,up)
Suppose that Green Giant and Red Rover are two companies competing in the canned vegetable market. Each is contemplating an aggressive new ad campaign. The payoffs of each decision are listed below, where Green Giant is player 1. Green/Red Ad Campaign No Ad Campaign |Ad Campaign |1 million, 1 million zero, 3 million No Ad Campaign 3 million, zero 2 million, 2 million What is the Nash equilibrium of the game? a. (advertise, don't advertise) b. (advertise, advertise) c. (don't advertise, don't advertise) d. (don't advertise, advertise)
Consider the attached game depicted in Normal Form. Find one Nash equilibrium and verify that it is a Nash equilibrium. Note: 1. Remember to express the Nash equilibrium in the form of a strategy profile. 2. Use the definition of Nash equilibrium to verify that the strategy profile you find is really a Nash equilibrium.
1. Find all of the pure strategy Nash Equilibrium to the following simultaneous move game. Show all of your work. Row a b C d e A 9,4 14,8 7,8 15,0 20,18 B 12,10 3,10 6,8 7,4 2,9 Column C 15,7 12,18 20,10 14.2 10,14 D 2,8 4,7 3,12 5.3 3,7 E 15,5 20,12 15,9 9,1 19,20
Hi this is from a textbook. Thank you. Consider the following game in which Sally can play T or B and John chooses between L or R. Each player makes their choice simultaneously. If Sally chooses T and John chooses L, Sally gets a payoff of 5 and John has a payoff of 4. If Sally plays T and John R, Sally’s payoff is 8 and John gets 3. If Sally Chooses B and John L, the payoffs are 3 to Sally and 2 to John. Finally, if Sally chooses B and John R, the payoffs are 7 to Sally and 0 to John. Which statement is true? a) The Nash equilibrium is (B,R); this is a prisoners’ dilemma b) The Nash equilibrium is (T,R); this is a prisoners’ dilemma c) The Nash equilibrium is (T,R); this is not dominant strategy equilibrium d) The Nash equilibrium is (T,L); this is a dominant strategy equilibrium e) None of the above
Aa4
Use the following one-shot, normal-form game to answer the following questions a. Find each player’s dominant strategy, if it exists. b. Find each player’s secure strategy. c. Find the Nash equilibrium.
3. For the friend-foe game, recall that there were 3 Nash equilibria possible, but the equilibria set didn't include the cooperative outcome, for which both players would win. Friend Foe Friend | 500,500 0,1000 Foe 1000,0 0,0 a) If the game is played repeatedly, propose a play strategy that will enforce cooperation. For what values of ô (discount factor) the equilibrium will be (Friend, Friend)?