3(e). If it is true that the line integral F. dr 0 for all closed curves C₁ show that the line integral over a non-closed curve depends only on the beginning- and end-points of the curve.

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question
100%
Page 14 of 27
3(c). If it is true that the line integral
F F. dr 0 for all closed curves C,
=
show that the line integral over a non-closed curve depends only on
the beginning- and end-points of the curve.
3(d). Suppose that F is given by F(u, v, w) = ueu + we, + v² ew. with
respect to an orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system (u, v, w) with
scale factors h = w, h = u and he v. Determine div F.
Multivariable and Complex Calculus II
Transcribed Image Text:Page 14 of 27 3(c). If it is true that the line integral F F. dr 0 for all closed curves C, = show that the line integral over a non-closed curve depends only on the beginning- and end-points of the curve. 3(d). Suppose that F is given by F(u, v, w) = ueu + we, + v² ew. with respect to an orthogonal curvilinear coordinate system (u, v, w) with scale factors h = w, h = u and he v. Determine div F. Multivariable and Complex Calculus II
Multivariable and Complex Calculus II
Question 3.
Let F: R³ R³ be any C² vector field.
→
3(a). Prove that the divergence of the curl of F is zero.
3(b). For F as defined above, a misguided professor claims that for any
closed curve C, F. dr = 0 because of the argument:
$
F-dr
- 11.S
( ( ▼ × F)-dS = [], div (curl F) dV = [] oav = 0,
by using Stokes theorem, the divergence theorem, and then part (a),
for an appropriately chosen surface S and volume W. Carefully explain
all the errors in this argument.
Page 12 of 27
Transcribed Image Text:Multivariable and Complex Calculus II Question 3. Let F: R³ R³ be any C² vector field. → 3(a). Prove that the divergence of the curl of F is zero. 3(b). For F as defined above, a misguided professor claims that for any closed curve C, F. dr = 0 because of the argument: $ F-dr - 11.S ( ( ▼ × F)-dS = [], div (curl F) dV = [] oav = 0, by using Stokes theorem, the divergence theorem, and then part (a), for an appropriately chosen surface S and volume W. Carefully explain all the errors in this argument. Page 12 of 27
Expert Solution
steps

Step by step

Solved in 4 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,