39. In this exercise we estimate the rate at which the total per- sonal income is rising in the Richmond-Petersburg, Virginia, metropolitan area. In 1999, the population of this area was 961,400, and the population was increasing at roughly 9200 people per year. The average annual income was $30,593 per capita, and this average was increasing at about $1400 per year (a little above the national average of about $1225 yearly). Use the Product Rule and these figures to estimate the rate at which total personal income was rising in the Richmond-Petersburg area in 1999. Explain the meaning of each term in the Product Rule.

39. In this exercise we estimate the rate at which the total per- sonal income is rising in the Richmond-Petersburg, Virginia, metropolitan area. In 1999, the population of this area was 961,400, and the population was increasing at roughly 9200 people per year. The average annual income was $30,593 per capita, and this average was increasing at about $1400 per year (a little above the national average of about $1225 yearly). Use the Product Rule and these figures to estimate the rate at which total personal income was rising in the Richmond-Petersburg area in 1999. Explain the meaning of each term in the Product Rule.

Principles of Economics, 7th Edition (MindTap Course List)

7th Edition

ISBN:9781285165875

Author:N. Gregory Mankiw

Publisher:N. Gregory Mankiw

Chapter20: Income Inequality And Poverty

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 2QCMC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

urgent
Consider the following table with individuals in a country and their incomes: Individuals Income 1 15 30 4 45 55 6 70 7 85 8. 100 115 10 130 Total 650 O The ratio of income received by the top decile to the bottom quintile is 3.5. O The ratio of income received by the top decile to the bottom quintile is 7.3. O The ratio of income received by the top decile to the bottom quintile is 4.3. O The ratio of income received by the top decile to the bottom quintile is 6.5.
23. Arnold, Betty, Christine, Donald, and Elena receive incomes of $0, $400, $200, $100, and $300. Starting with the top 20% of the population, write in the correct income share in percentages. Then in a line below it, write in the income share for the second 20%. In another line write in the income share for the middle 20%, then on another line, the income share for the fourth 20%, and finally the income share for the bottom 20%. Please state your answers in percentages for full credit. You do not have to show your calculation. population share income share top 20% ______________ 2nd 20% ______________ mid 20% _____________ 4th 20% _____________ bottom 20% _____________ 24. Based on your answers in question #23, fill in the cumulative income distribution table using percentages. Please start with…
Please do fast and add explanation and check answer properly.........
Please I need answer to both
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $55,000, $30,000, $15,000, $20,000, $35,000, $80,000, $40,000, $45,000, $30,000, $50,000. Calculate the share of total income each quintile of this income distribution received. Do the top and bottom quintiles in this distribution have a greater or larger share of total income than the top and bottom quintiles of the U.S. income distribution for 2005?
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $55,000, $30,000, $15,000, $20,000, $35,000, $80,000, $40,000, $45,000, $30,000, $50,000. Complete the table. Income Quintile Share of Income $15,000 Bottom $20,000 $30,000 2nd $30,000 $35,000 3rd $40,000 $45,000 4th $50,000 $55,000 Top $80,000 If $4000 is taxed from the top earner and transferred to the lowest earner, would that increase or decrease the share of income held by the top quintile? Would this transfer increase or decrease the share of income held by the bottom quintile? Would this have any effect on the 2nd quintile? The 3rd? The 4th? Would this transfer increase, decrease, or have no effect on income inequality in this group? Redistributing income from the highest earner to the lowest one would reduce the utility of the top earner and increase the utility of the lowest earner. But what would happen to the overall utility of the…
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $55,000, $30,000, $15,000, $20,000, $35,000, $80,000, $40,000, $45,000, $30,000, $50,000. Complete the table. Income Quintile Share of Income $15,000 Bottom $20,000 $30,000 2nd $30,000 $35,000 3rd $40,000 $45,000 4th $50,000 $55,000 Top $80,000 $4000 is taxed from the top earner and transferred to the lowest earner Would this transfer increase, decrease, or have no effect on income inequality in this group? Redistributing income from the highest earner to the lowest one would reduce the utility of the top earner and increase the utility of the lowest earner. But what would happen to overall utility in the economy? Would it increase, decrease, or remain the same? Explain your answer. (Hint: does the marginal utility of income diminish as one earns more?)
A group of 10 people have the following annual incomes: $55,000, $30,000, $15,000, $20,000, $35,000, $80,000, $40,000, $45,000, $30,000, $50,000. Complete the table. Income Quintile Share of Income $15,000 Bottom $20,000 $30,000 2nd $30,000 $35,000 3rd $40,000 $45,000 4th $50,000 $55,000 Top $80,000 If $4000 is taxed from the top earner and transferred to the lowest earner, would that increase or decrease the share of income held by the top quintile? Would this transfer increase or decrease the share of income held by the bottom quintile? Would this have any effect on the 2nd quintile? The 3rd? The 4th? Would this transfer increase, decrease, or have no effect on income inequality in this group? Redistributing income from the highest earner to the lowest one would reduce the utility of the top earner and increase the utility of the lowest earner. But what would happen to overall utility in the…
A5
The government announces programs designed to reduce the share of income going to the top quintile from 60% to 20%. You predict that the most likely result is that: O mean household income will fall, because the highest income earners will earn less and work less. median household income will rise, because some of the 40% of redistributed income will be transferred to the third quintile. after redistribution, each quintile will receive 20% of total wealth. O the lowest quintile will receive the 40% taken from the top quintile and switch places.
I need help soon as possible