(30%) Suppose there is a joint project that generates an amount 10 for each of the individuals A and B, provided the sum total of A's and B's investments in the project is at least 7. Suppose A's investment is denoted by x and B's by y, where x and y can take any values in {0,1,2,3,4,..,8,9,10}. A player always has to incur the cost of the investment (equal to a or y respectively) and gets the benefit if and only if the project goes ahead. Suppose each player is interested in his own net benefit (benefit-cost) and players choose their investment levels simultaneously. The following relate to pure strategies. (a) Is there a Nash equilibrium in which both players invest 0? (b) Is there a Nash equilibrium in which one player invests 0 and the other does not? (c) What is the lowest payoff a player can get in any Nash equilibrium?
Answer the attached question
![(30%) Suppose there is a joint project that generates an amount 10 for each of the
individuals A and B, provided the sum total of A's and B's investments in the project is
at least 7. Suppose A's investment is denoted by x and B's by y, where x and y can take
any values in {0,1,2,3,4,..,8,9,10}. A player always has to incur the cost of the investment
(equal to a or y respectively) and gets the benefit if and only if the project goes ahead.
Suppose each player is interested in his own net benefit (benefit-cost) and players choose
their investment levels simultaneously. The following relate to pure strategies.
(a) Is there a Nash equilibrium in which both players invest 0?
(b) Is there a Nash equilibrium in which one player invests 0 and the other does not?
(c) What is the lowest payoff a player can get in any Nash equilibrium?](/v2/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcontent.bartleby.com%2Fqna-images%2Fquestion%2Fc1153e22-f1aa-49b1-8938-78e54eff53d7%2Fc862006d-b314-4e5d-b502-3f4b4ab4849f%2Firsn8zc_processed.png&w=3840&q=75)
![](/static/compass_v2/shared-icons/check-mark.png)
Nash Equilibrium Means an optimal solution in a non - cooperative games in which every player is lacking any incentives to change their initial strategy. In a Nash Equilibrium, a player does not gain anything from deviating from their chosen strategy.
Answer a)
When the player invest 0 there is no Nash Equilibrium
There is no Nash Equilibrium when the players invest Zero
Net Benefit is equal to 0
Now, consider the following deviation:
Individual A invests Rs 3 and Individual B invests Rs 4 in the project.
Net Benefit of A = 10-3
= 7 > 0 ( when player invests 0)
Net Benefit of B= 10-4
=6 >0
Thus, both individuals have an incentive in the unilateral deviation.
Step by step
Solved in 4 steps
![Blurred answer](/static/compass_v2/solution-images/blurred-answer.jpg)
![ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9780190931919/9780190931919_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Principles of Economics (12th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134078779/9780134078779_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Engineering Economy (17th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134870069/9780134870069_smallCoverImage.gif)
![ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS](https://compass-isbn-assets.s3.amazonaws.com/isbn_cover_images/9780190931919/9780190931919_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Principles of Economics (12th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134078779/9780134078779_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Engineering Economy (17th Edition)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780134870069/9780134870069_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305585126/9781305585126_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337106665/9781337106665_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781259290619/9781259290619_smallCoverImage.gif)