3) Consider the table below containing data for Germany and Japan on the ratio of employment to population in 1980 and 2010. 1980 2010 Germany Japan 0.33 0.52 0.48 0.49 Using data on real GDP per person from table below, find average labor productivity for each country in 1980 and 2010. How much of the increase in output per person in each country over the 1980 to 2010 period is due to increased labor productivity? To increased employment relative to population? Country 1870 1913 1950 1980 1990 2010 Annual % change 1870-2010 Annual % change 1950-2010 Annual % change 1980-2010 United States 2,445 5,301 9,561 18,577 23,201 30,491 United Kingdom 3,190 4,921 6,939 12,931 16,430 23,777 Germany 1,839 3,648 3,881 14,114 15,929 20,661 1.8 2.0 1.7 1.4 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.8 1.3 Japan China 737 1,387 1,921 13,428 18,789 530 552 21,935 2.5 4.1 1.6 448 1,061 1,871 8,032 2.0 4.9 7.0 Brazil 713 811 1,672 5,195 4,920 6,879 1.6 2.4 0.9 India 533 673 619 938 1,309 3,372 1.3 2.9 4.4 Ghana 439 781 1,122 1,157 1,062 1,922 1.1 0.9 1.7

3) Consider the table below containing data for Germany and Japan on the ratio of employment to population in 1980 and 2010. 1980 2010 Germany Japan 0.33 0.52 0.48 0.49 Using data on real GDP per person from table below, find average labor productivity for each country in 1980 and 2010. How much of the increase in output per person in each country over the 1980 to 2010 period is due to increased labor productivity? To increased employment relative to population? Country 1870 1913 1950 1980 1990 2010 Annual % change 1870-2010 Annual % change 1950-2010 Annual % change 1980-2010 United States 2,445 5,301 9,561 18,577 23,201 30,491 United Kingdom 3,190 4,921 6,939 12,931 16,430 23,777 Germany 1,839 3,648 3,881 14,114 15,929 20,661 1.8 2.0 1.7 1.4 2.1 2.1 1.7 2.8 1.3 Japan China 737 1,387 1,921 13,428 18,789 530 552 21,935 2.5 4.1 1.6 448 1,061 1,871 8,032 2.0 4.9 7.0 Brazil 713 811 1,672 5,195 4,920 6,879 1.6 2.4 0.9 India 533 673 619 938 1,309 3,372 1.3 2.9 4.4 Ghana 439 781 1,122 1,157 1,062 1,922 1.1 0.9 1.7

Exploring Economics

8th Edition

ISBN:9781544336329

Author:Robert L. Sexton

Publisher:Robert L. Sexton

Chapter20: Economic Growth In The Global Economy

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 4P

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The following table shows the GDP per capita of various countries forthe years 1960 and 2010 in PPP-adjusted 2005 dollars. The table alsocontains the implied growth rates, which show how much on average eachcountry needed to grow each year to reach the 2010 level of GDP per capitastarting from the 1960 level of GDP per capita. Use the table to answer thefollowing questions. 1. Why have some countries reduced the gap between their incomes andthat of the United States and other countries failed to do so?
The following table shows the GDP per capita of various countries forthe years 1960 and 2010 in PPP-adjusted 2005 dollars. The table alsocontains the implied growth rates, which show how much on average eachcountry needed to grow each year to reach the 2010 level of GDP per capitastarting from the 1960 level of GDP per capita. Use the table to answer thefollowing questions. 1. During 1960-2010, which countries were able to reduce the gap betweentheir GDP per capita and the U.S. GDP per capita?
Which of the following is true about classifying countries as low income, middle income, or high income? O There is no criteria for classifying economies as low income, middle income, or high income O Countries with unemployment rates above 5% are classified as low income Low income countries have $1,025 per capita GDP per year or lower O High income countries have $15,625 GDP per capita GDP per year or higher
Say that the average worker in the U.S. economy is eight times as productive as an average worker in Mexico. If the productivity of U.S. workers grows at 2 for 25 years and the productivity of Mexicos workers grows at 6 for 25 years, which country will have higher worker productivity at that point?
In 1980, Denmark had a GDP of 70 billion (measured in U.S. dollars} and a population of 5.1 million. In 2000, Denmark had 3 GDP of 160 billion (measured in U.S. dollars} and a population of 5.3 million. By what percentage did Denmarks GDP per capita rise between 1980 and 2000?
An economy starts off with a GDP per capita of 5,000. How large will the GDP per capita be if it grows at an annual rate of 2 for 20 years? 2 for 40 years? 4 for 40 years? 6 for 40 years?
Question 22 Here are hypothetical data for Germany and Japan on average labor productivity, the number of persons employed, and population in a given year: Average labor |productivity S88,204 $44,216 Number of persons employed 32.36 million 50.48 million than that of Germany by approximately . Population 78.17 million 104.3 million Germany Japan Japan's real GDP per person is O lower; $15,114 O higher; $121,711 O lower; $121,711 O higher; $15,114
What is the largest contributing factor to human population growth during the 20th and 21st century? a decrease in birth rates an increase in death rates O a decrease in death rates O an increase in birth rates
The following table shows the GDP per capita since 1820 in selectedcountries (in PPP-adjusted 2005 dollars). 1. Identify the countries that experienced sustained growth between 1820and 2010.
The hockey stick of growth shows us O That environmental damage has increased dramatically in the past century That GDP per capita has increased dramatically in the past century O That wealth per capita has increased dramatically in the past century O That inflation per capita has increased dramatically in the past century
Between 1970 and 2005, Chinaâ€™s GDP per capita grew at an average rate of 7.3% per year while GDP per capita in the US grew at an average rate of 2.2%. In 2005, US GDP per capita was $36,806 and Chinese GDP per capita was $5,955. Assuming that the two countries continue to grow at these rates, in what year will China overtake the US in terms of GDP per capita?
Suppose that U.S. real GDP per capita is $50,000 and grows on average at 3% per year. How long will it take for U.S. real GDP per capita to double at this growth rate? If this growth rate continues, what will U.S. real GDP r capita be in 70 years? S Suppose that U.S. real GDP per capita is $50,000 and grows on average at 5% per year (rather than 3% a year) How long will it take for U.S. real GDP per capita to double at this growth rate? years (round to nearest year) If this growth rate continues, what will U.S. real GDP per capita be in 70 years? S years (round to nearest year)