2. Table 1 Output possibilities for South Korea and Japan Country South Korea Japan Output per worker per day Tons of steel 80 20 Laptops 40 20 a. Referring to Table 1, what is the opportunity cost of one laptop in Japan? What is the op what is the opportunity cost of one laptop in South Korea? b. According to the principle of absolute advantage, should Japan trade with South Korea? Why? I c. According to the principle of comparative advantage, what product should Japan export? What product should South Korea export? Why? d. With international trade, what would be the maximum amount of steel that South Korea would be willing to export to Japan in exchange for each laptop? Why? e. With international trade, what would be the maximum number of laptops that Japan would be willing to export to South Korea in exchange for each ton of steel? Why?

2. Table 1 Output possibilities for South Korea and Japan Country South Korea Japan Output per worker per day Tons of steel 80 20 Laptops 40 20 a. Referring to Table 1, what is the opportunity cost of one laptop in Japan? What is the op what is the opportunity cost of one laptop in South Korea? b. According to the principle of absolute advantage, should Japan trade with South Korea? Why? I c. According to the principle of comparative advantage, what product should Japan export? What product should South Korea export? Why? d. With international trade, what would be the maximum amount of steel that South Korea would be willing to export to Japan in exchange for each laptop? Why? e. With international trade, what would be the maximum number of laptops that Japan would be willing to export to South Korea in exchange for each ton of steel? Why?

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

5. The price of trade Suppose that Hungary and Norway both produce sunflowers and wheat. Hungary's opportunity cost of producing a bushel of wheat is 6 bushels of sunflowers while Norway's opportunity cost of producing a bushel of wheat is 12 bushels of sunflowers. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing wheat in the two countries, you can tell that production of wheat and has a comparative advantage in the production of sunflowers. Suppose that Hungary and Norway consider trading wheat and sunflowers with each other. Hungary can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of sunflowers for each bushel of wheat it exports to Norway. Similarly, Norway can gain from trade as long as of wheat for each bushel of sunflowers it exports to Hungary. it receives more than Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of wheat in terms of sunflowers) would allow both Norway and Hungary to gain from trade? Check…
With its existing resources Country A can produce either 500 million bushels of wheat or 40 million cars. They are presently not engaged in trade and are choosing to produce and consume 375 million bushels of wheat and 10 million cars. The country decides to completely specialize in wheat production. They trade 100 million bushels of wheat in exchange for 12 million cars. After trade they can consume million more bushels of wheat and million more cars than they could before trade?
Use the chart to answer the following question. Reduce the number of quotas Growth of trade Reduce protective tariffs Increased number of exports Variety of goods and services What is the BEST title for the chart? O A. Arguments for Protectionism B. Benefits of Free Trade O C. Disadvantages of Free Trade O D. Advantages to Trade Barriers
56 56 48 48 PPF 40 40 32 32 24 PPF 24 16 16 -- -- -- - 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 16 24 32 40 48 56 84 GRAIN (Millions of pounds) GRAIN (Millions of pounds) Maldonia has a comparative advantage in the production of while Lamponia has a comparative advantage in the production of Suppose that Maldonia and Lamponia specialize in the production of the goods in which each has a comparative advantage. After specialization, the two countries can produce a total of million pounds of sugar and million pounds of grain. Suppose that Maldonia ánd Lamponia agree to trade. Each country focuses its resources on producing only the good in which it has a comparative advantage. The countries decide to exchange 24 million pounds of grain for 24 million pounds of sugar. This ratio of goods is known as the price of trade between Maldonia and Lamponia. W SUGAR (MIlons of pounds) SUGAR (MIlions of pounds)
An automobile company has two factories, one in Vietnam and one in Australia, each with the same number of workers. The Vietnamese factory can produce either 150 engines or 100 transmissions per day. The Australian factory can produce either 200 engines or 150 transmissions per day. A. Which factory has an advantage is irrelevant since the theory of comparative advantage only applies to countries, not companies. B. The Australian factory has an comparative advantage in the production of transmissions. C. The Vietnamese factory has an absolute advantage producing both engines and transmissions. D. The Vietnamese factory has a comparative advantage in the production of transmissions.
5. The price of trade Suppose that France and Switzerland both produce jeans and olives. France's opportunity cost of producing a crate of olives is 5 pairs of jeans while Switzerland's opportunity cost of producing a crate of olives is 10 pairs of jeans. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing olives in the two countries, you can tell that production of olives and has a comparative advantage in the production of jeans. has a comparative advantage in the Suppose that France and Switzerland consider trading olives and jeans with each other. France can gain from specialization and trade as long as it of jeans for each crate of olives it exports to Switzerland. Similarly, Switzerland can gain from trade as long as it receives more than of olives for each pair of jeans it exports to France. receives more than Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of olives in terms of jeans) would allow both Switzerland and France to gain…
5. The price of trade Suppose that Poland and Liechtenstein both produce ale and shoes. Poland's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is 5 kegs of ale while Liechtenstein's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is 12 kegs of ale. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing shoes in the two countries, you can tell that production of shoes and has a comparative advantage in the production of ale. has a comparative advantage in the Suppose that Poland and Liechtenstein consider trading shoes and ale with each other. Poland can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than of ale for each pair of shoes it exports to Liechtenstein. Similarly, Liechtenstein can gain from trade as long as it of shoes for each keg of ale it exports to Poland. receives more than Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of shoes in terms of ale) would allow both Liechtenstein and Poland to gain from trade? Check…
3. Please answer Letter D
Figure 2-9 Snow cones 240 0 Greenland 200 Popsicles Snow cones 270 0 Iceland O 100 popsicles & 130 snow cones; 100 popsicles & 140 snow scones O 100 popsicles & 140 snow cones; 100 popsicles & 100 snow scones O 140 popsicles & 120 snow cones; 100 popsicles & 130 snow scones none of the above. 180 Popsicles Figure 2-9 shows the production possibilities frontiers for Greenland and Iceland. Each country produces two goods, snow cones and popsicles. With the opening of international trade, the agreed price between Iceland and Greenland for popsicles is 1.3. Assume that the country which now imports popsicles (with int'l trade) decides that it will import 100 units of popsicles. The new consumption bundles/points after international trade for Greenland and Iceland, respectively, are?
5. The price of trade Suppose that Poland and Wales both produce alive oil and shoes. Poland's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is 5 crates of olive oil while Wales's opportunity cost of producing a pair of shoes is 11 crates of olive oil. By comparing the opportunity cost of producing shoes in the two countries, you can tell that Poland production of shoes and Wales has a comparative advantage in the production of olive oil. has a comparative advantage in the Suppose that Poland and Wales consider trading shoes and olive oil with each other. Poland can gain from specialization and trade as long as it receives more than 5 crates of olive oil for each pair of shoes it exports to Wales. Similarly, Wales can gain from trade as long as it receives more than 11 pairs of shoes for each crate of olive oil it exports to Poland. Based on your answer to the last question, which of the following prices of trade (that is, price of shoes in terms of olive oil) would allow both Wales…
Need help
Figure 9-1 The figure illustrates the market for coffee in Guatemala 130 88888888 140 130 120- 110 100 90 70+ S 50 RRS 40 30 89 20 10- Price & 12 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 9. Refer to Figure 9-1. With trade, Guatemala will a. export 22 units of coffee b. export 10 units of coffee. c. import 30 units of coffee. d. import 12 units of coffee. Domestic supply World price Domestic demand + 42 44 46 48 50 52 Quantity