Answered: 2. Show graphically that tax cuts are a…

2. Show graphically that tax cuts are a lesS effective fiscal policy tool the greater the sensitivity of investment to interest rates.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Why $100 spent by government brings a larger increase in the equilibrium level of income than $100 given in tax cut? Explain your answer.
Suppose the government, in an effort to avoid an increase in the deficit, votes for a budget neutral tax cut policy. Assume the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) is equal to 0.75 and taxes are cut by $15 billion. Round answers to the nearest billion, and specify decreases as a negative number. By how much will government spending change? change in government spending: $ What is the resulting change in the equilibrium level of real GDP? change in equilibrium level of real GDP: $ billion billion
17 The graph below depicts an economy where a decline in aggregate demand has caused a recession. Assume the government decides to conduct fiscal policy by increasing government purchases to reduce the burden of this recession. Price Level 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 (40, 100) Fiscal Policy LRAS प्रै ======= AD₁ billion AS 80 160 240 320 400 480 560 640 720 800 Real GDP (billions of dollars) $| Suppose instead that the MPC is 0.5. AD Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number. a. How much does aggregate demand need to change to restore the economy to its long-run equilibrium? $ billion b. If the MPC is 0.6, how much does government purchases need to change to shift aggregate demand by the amount you found in part a? c. How much does aggregate demand and government purchases need to change to restore the economy to its long-run equilibrium? Aggregate demand needs to change by $ billion and government purchases need to change by $ billion.
There is a tax-cut that increases your Disposable Income by $3,400, which you intend to save $510. a. Calculate the MPC. b. Interpret this MPC. (What does it mean? Define MPC and describe in this context.)c. What is the resulting fiscal multiplier? d. Interpret the multiplier and describe the multiplier effect. e. Find the total change to the economy from this tax change.
2. Assume a given economy has an equilibrium GDP of $360 billion. A. If government spending and taxes both increase by $40 billion, determine the new equilibrium GDP. B. If both G and taxes increase by $40 billion, what impact will these two changes happening at the same time have on the budget? In other words, will these two changes cause a surplus, a deficit, or a balanced budget? C. Solve for the numerical value of the balanced budget multiplier.
Solve all questions compulsory......
Refer to the photo below. What is the equilibrium level of income for this economy if Y = C + I + G ? a. 240.71 b. 240.86 c. 242.86 d. 242.91 What is the size of the tax multiplier for this economy? a. 2.19 b. 2.29 c. 2.31 d. 2.6
In which of the following circumstances is expansionary fiscal p In which of the following circumstances is expansionary fiscal policy more likely to lead to a short-run increase in investment? Explain.a. When the investment accelerator is large or when it is small?b. When the interest sensitivity of investment is large or when it is small?
6. Use the following table to answer these questions: Y X $ 500 $ 500 $ 10 $ 20 $ 60 $ 600 $ 590 $ 10 $ 20 $ 40 $ 700 $ 680 $ 10 $ 20 $ 20 $ 800 $ 770 $ 10 $ 20 $ 0 $ 900 $ 860 $ 10 $ 20 -$ 20 $1,000 $ 950 $ 10 $ 20 -$ 40 a.What is the Marginal Propensity to Import? b.What is the Marginal Propensity to Invetst? c.What the difference between both of them?
5. Show why a $10 billion reduction in government purchases of goods and services will have a larger effect on real GDP than a $10 billion reduction in government transfers by completing the accom- panying table for an economy with a marginal propensity to consume (MPC) of 0.6. The first and second rows of the table are filled in for you: on the left side of the table, in the first row, the $10 billion reduction in government purchases decreases real GDP and disposable income, YD, by $10 billion, lead- ing to a reduction in consumer spending of $6 billion Rounds 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Decrease in G=-$10 billion (billions of dollars) Change in real GDP Change in G or C AG = -$10.00 AC = AC = AC = AC = AC = AC = AC = AC = AC = -6.00 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? -$10.00 -6.00 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Change in YD -$10.00 -6.00 ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Change in TR or C ATR=-$10.00 AC = AC = AC = AC = AC = AC = AC = AC = AC = (MPC x change in disposable income) in row 2. How- ever, on the right side of the table, the $10…
2. Fiscal policy Suppose a hypothetical economy is currently in a situation of deficient aggregate demand of $64 billion. Four economists agree that expansionary fiscal policy can increase total spending and move the economy out of recession, but they are debating which type of expansionary policy should be used. Economist A believes that the government spending multiplier is 8 and the tax multiplier is 4. Economist B believes that the government spending multiplier is 4 and the tax multiplier is 2. Compute the amount the government would have to increase spending to close the output gap according to each economist's belief. Then, for each scenario, compute the size of the tax cut that would achieve this same effect. Policy Options for Closing Output Gap Increase in Spending Tax Cut (Billions of dollars) Spending Multiplier (Billions of dollars) Tax Multiplier 4 Economist A 8 Economist B 4 2 Economist C favors increases in government spending over tax cuts. This means that Economist C…
The Canadian federal budget moved from a surplus of 9.6billioninthe2007-2008 fiscalyeartoade ficitof5.8 billion the next year, and a large deficit of S55.6 billion in 2009-2010. a. Suppose real GDP was at potential in each of the first two years. What can you conclude about the cause of the change in the budget deficit? Show this change in a diagram of the budget deficit function. b. Suppose from 2008-2009 to 2009-2010, two things happened: real GDP fell and the government implemented an expansionary fiscal policy (both of which were true). Show these two separate events in a diagram of the budget deficit function.