1.4 Exercises from Mathematics of Finance: An Intuitive Introduction In the Olympic finals, only three teams are represented; USA, England, and China. Svetlana believes the USA will win and offers even odds of 1:1. Roberto is supporting England and is offering 2:1 odds. (So, if Engla

Advanced Engineering Mathematics
10th Edition
ISBN:9780470458365
Author:Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:Erwin Kreyszig
Chapter2: Second-order Linear Odes
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1RQ
icon
Related questions
Question

  1.4 Exercises from Mathematics of Finance: An Intuitive Introduction

In the Olympic finals, only three teams are represented; USA, England, and
China. Svetlana believes the USA will win and offers even odds of 1:1. Roberto
is supporting England and is offering 2:1 odds. (So, if England wins, Roberto
keeps his money. If one of the other teams wins, Roberto pays $2 for each
dollar bet.) Finally, Jeff supports China as given by his 5:4 odds. Determine the
optimal way of dividing $100 to bet that ensures the largest winning.
A message from this example is that whenever exuberance causes individuals to offer strong odds, such as during a political campaign, arbitrage is
available. To see the arbitrage opportunities from this example, if a third of
the money is bet with each person, only one can win; the winnings from one
other bet cover the loss and winnings from the third are profit.
But this exercise, as with the gender example, also emphasizes the importance of understanding the provided information. When betting with one of
these individuals, such as Jeff, is the bet whether China will or will not win, or
does the bet require you to put forth a team and you win money only if your
team wins. The difference is huge; the intent is the first, but, as a challenge, can
the second be handled? 

Thanks!

6. In the Olympic finals, only three teams are represented; USA, England, and
China. Svetlana believes the USA will win and offers even odds of 1:1. Roberto
is supporting England and is offering 2:1 odds. (So, if England wins, Roberto
keeps his money. If one of the other teams wins, Roberto pays $2 for each
dollar bet.) Finally, Jeff supports China as given by his 5:4 odds. Determine the
optimal way of dividing $100 to bet that ensures the largest winning.
A message from this example is that whenever exuberance causes individ-
uals to offer strong odds, such as during a political campaign, arbitrage is
available. To see the arbitrage opportunities from this example, if a third of
the money is bet with each person, only one can win; the winnings from one
other bet cover the loss and winnings from the third are profit.
But this exercise, as with the gender example, also emphasizes the impor-
tance of understanding the provided information. When betting with one of
these individuals, such as Jeff, is the bet whether China will or will not win, or
does the bet require you to put forth a team and you win money only if your
team wins. The difference is huge; the intent is the first, but, as a challenge, can
the second be handled?
Transcribed Image Text:6. In the Olympic finals, only three teams are represented; USA, England, and China. Svetlana believes the USA will win and offers even odds of 1:1. Roberto is supporting England and is offering 2:1 odds. (So, if England wins, Roberto keeps his money. If one of the other teams wins, Roberto pays $2 for each dollar bet.) Finally, Jeff supports China as given by his 5:4 odds. Determine the optimal way of dividing $100 to bet that ensures the largest winning. A message from this example is that whenever exuberance causes individ- uals to offer strong odds, such as during a political campaign, arbitrage is available. To see the arbitrage opportunities from this example, if a third of the money is bet with each person, only one can win; the winnings from one other bet cover the loss and winnings from the third are profit. But this exercise, as with the gender example, also emphasizes the impor- tance of understanding the provided information. When betting with one of these individuals, such as Jeff, is the bet whether China will or will not win, or does the bet require you to put forth a team and you win money only if your team wins. The difference is huge; the intent is the first, but, as a challenge, can the second be handled?
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps with 2 images

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Engineering Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780470458365
Author:
Erwin Kreyszig
Publisher:
Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Numerical Methods for Engineers
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780073397924
Author:
Steven C. Chapra Dr., Raymond P. Canale
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Introductory Mathematics for Engineering Applicat…
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781118141809
Author:
Nathan Klingbeil
Publisher:
WILEY
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Mathematics For Machine Technology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9781337798310
Author:
Peterson, John.
Publisher:
Cengage Learning,
Basic Technical Mathematics
Basic Technical Mathematics
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134437705
Author:
Washington
Publisher:
PEARSON
Topology
Topology
Advanced Math
ISBN:
9780134689517
Author:
Munkres, James R.
Publisher:
Pearson,