Homework Help is Here – Start Your Trial Now!
Social Science
Political Science
1. Describe the argument that the necessary and proper and supremacy clauses would be used by the federal government to destroy the powers of the state governments.

1. Describe the argument that the necessary and proper and supremacy clauses would be used by the federal government to destroy the powers of the state governments.

icon
Related questions
Question

These questions are about Brutus 1, I have no idea how to answer these I cant find any examples on the web either so im pretty stuck.

1. Describe the argument that the necessary and proper and supremacy clauses would be used by the federal government to destroy the powers of the state governments. 2. Identify the specific powers listed in Brutus No. 1 to support the argument that the Constitution gives Congress too much power over the economy. 3. Explain the argument made in Brutus No. 1 that the federal courts would destroy the power of the state courts. 4. Describe two arguments made by Brutus No. 1 to support the claim that large republics cannot protect democracy. 5. Explain how Brutus No. 1 supports the argument that a standing army will lead to tyranny.
Transcribed Image Text:1. Describe the argument that the necessary and proper and supremacy clauses would be used by the federal government to destroy the powers of the state governments. 2. Identify the specific powers listed in Brutus No. 1 to support the argument that the Constitution gives Congress too much power over the economy. 3. Explain the argument made in Brutus No. 1 that the federal courts would destroy the power of the state courts. 4. Describe two arguments made by Brutus No. 1 to support the claim that large republics cannot protect democracy. 5. Explain how Brutus No. 1 supports the argument that a standing army will lead to tyranny.
Brutus No. 1 argues against a large and diverse republic, stating, “[i]n a republic, the manners, sentiments, and interests of the people should be similar." Yet, the United States has always been a heterogeneous nation. To what degree has the United States, as a large and diverse nation, managed to overcome the argument made in Brutus No. 1 that democracy works best in countries where people share similar characteristics and viewpoints?
Transcribed Image Text:Brutus No. 1 argues against a large and diverse republic, stating, “[i]n a republic, the manners, sentiments, and interests of the people should be similar." Yet, the United States has always been a heterogeneous nation. To what degree has the United States, as a large and diverse nation, managed to overcome the argument made in Brutus No. 1 that democracy works best in countries where people share similar characteristics and viewpoints?
Expert Solution
Step 1

Democracy is agreed to be the best among the worst available forms of government. The best element in this form of government is that people have the decision making power with themselves, they are the real sovereigns. The not so best part about it is, how to reconcile diverse opinion and interests. It is to address this problem that the constitution comes into the picture which acts as a contract/agreement according to which the democracy functions.

trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

SEE SOLUTIONCheck out a sample Q&A here
Blurred answer