1. Consider the following game in strategic or normal form. A2 B2 C2 A1 1,0 1,2 -2,1 B1 6,2 0,3 2,3 C1 2,2 -2,1 2,3 a. Use the iterative elimination of strictly dominated strategies to reduce the game as much as possible. b. What is the set of rationalizable strategies for each player? c. What is/are Nash equilibrium(s) in this game? d Exolain the differences between coonerative and non, coonerative games What are the fundamental

1. Consider the following game in strategic or normal form. A2 B2 C2 A1 1,0 1,2 -2,1 B1 6,2 0,3 2,3 C1 2,2 -2,1 2,3 a. Use the iterative elimination of strictly dominated strategies to reduce the game as much as possible. b. What is the set of rationalizable strategies for each player? c. What is/are Nash equilibrium(s) in this game? d Exolain the differences between coonerative and non, coonerative games What are the fundamental

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.
PART C D
3. Nash Equilibria Consider the following (normal-form) game. Compute a Nash Equilibrium of this game. U C D L | M R 5,0 1,3 4,0 2,4 1,4 3,5 0,1 1,0 5,0
Table 8. This table shows a game played between two players, A and B. The payoffs are given in the table as (Payoff to A, Payoff to B). A Select one: Up Middle Down Left (4,2) a. Middle-Center O b. Down-Center (3, 1) (1,3) B Center (2,5) (5, 3) (4,4) Refer to Table 8. This table shows a game played between two players, A and B. The payoffs in the table are shown as (Payoff to A, Payoff to B). Which of the following outcomes represents a Nash equilibrium in the game? Right (3, 3) (5,2) (6, 1) O c. Up-Left O d. More than one of the above is a Nash equilibrium in this game.
QUESTION 3 Up Down In the game above, what is/are the sub-game perfect Nash equilibrium? Ⓒ (up,up) (up,down) Player 1 (down, up) (down, down) No equilibrium exists Up Down Up Down Player 2 P1 gets $25 P2 gets $25 P1 gets $7 P2 gets $30 P1 gets $13 P2 gets $9 P1 gets $8 P2 gets $6
1.Draw the extensive form representation of this game. 2. Find a subgame perfect equilibrium (SPE) of this game. focus on pure-strategies only.
#7
4