1. Can Smith and Hensen do anything to improve performance? 2. Is there an alternative to the current operations approach of the maintenance department? 3. How could production make up for lost output resulting from scheduled maintenance? 4. How could maintenance mechanics be better utilized? 5. Is there any way to know when a machine breakdown is probable?

Practical Management Science
6th Edition
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Chapter2: Introduction To Spreadsheet Modeling
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 20P: Julie James is opening a lemonade stand. She believes the fixed cost per week of running the stand...
icon
Related questions
Question
fibers in less time and at lower prices. Conner had already been called on the carpet at corporate headquarters
over output levels that were significantly below the budgeted numbers. The business cycle contained
predictable seasonal variations. That meant building inventories that would be carried for months, tying up
scarce capital, a characteristic of most continuous processes. Monthly shipments would look bad. Year-to-date
shipments would look even worse because of machine breakdowns and lost output to date. Conner knew that
something had to be done to develop machine reliability. Capacity on demand was needed to respond to
growing foreign competition. Unreliable production equipment was jeopardizing the company's TQM effort by
causing process variations that affected both first-quality product yields and on-time deliveries, but no one
seemed to have the answer to the problem of machine breakdowns.
The maintenance department operated much like a fire department, rushing to a breakdown with a swarm of
mechanics, some who disassembled the machine while others pored over wiring schematics and still others
hunted for spare parts in the maintenance warehouse. Eventually, they would have the machine back up,
though sometimes only after working through the night to get the production line going again. Maintenance
had always been done this way. However, with new competitors, machine reliability had suddenly become a
major barrier to competing successfully.
Rumors of a plant closing were beginning to circulate and morale was suffering, making good performance that
much more difficult. Beth Conner knew she needed solutions if the plant had any chance of survival.
Discussion Questions
1. Can Smith and Hensen do anything to improve performance?
2. Is there an alternative to the current operations approach of the maintenance department?
3. How could production make up for lost output resulting from scheduled maintenance?
4. How could maintenance mechanics be better utilized?
5. Is there any way to know when a machine breakdown is probable?
Transcribed Image Text:fibers in less time and at lower prices. Conner had already been called on the carpet at corporate headquarters over output levels that were significantly below the budgeted numbers. The business cycle contained predictable seasonal variations. That meant building inventories that would be carried for months, tying up scarce capital, a characteristic of most continuous processes. Monthly shipments would look bad. Year-to-date shipments would look even worse because of machine breakdowns and lost output to date. Conner knew that something had to be done to develop machine reliability. Capacity on demand was needed to respond to growing foreign competition. Unreliable production equipment was jeopardizing the company's TQM effort by causing process variations that affected both first-quality product yields and on-time deliveries, but no one seemed to have the answer to the problem of machine breakdowns. The maintenance department operated much like a fire department, rushing to a breakdown with a swarm of mechanics, some who disassembled the machine while others pored over wiring schematics and still others hunted for spare parts in the maintenance warehouse. Eventually, they would have the machine back up, though sometimes only after working through the night to get the production line going again. Maintenance had always been done this way. However, with new competitors, machine reliability had suddenly become a major barrier to competing successfully. Rumors of a plant closing were beginning to circulate and morale was suffering, making good performance that much more difficult. Beth Conner knew she needed solutions if the plant had any chance of survival. Discussion Questions 1. Can Smith and Hensen do anything to improve performance? 2. Is there an alternative to the current operations approach of the maintenance department? 3. How could production make up for lost output resulting from scheduled maintenance? 4. How could maintenance mechanics be better utilized? 5. Is there any way to know when a machine breakdown is probable?
Worldwide Chemical Company
Jack Smith wiped the perspiration from his face. It was another scorching-hot summer day, and one of the four
process refrigeration units was down. The units were critical to the operation of Worldwide Chemical
Company's Fibers Plant, which produces synthetic fibers and polymer flake for a global market.
Before long, Al Henson, the day-shift production superintendent, was on the intercom, shouting his familiar
proclamation that "heads would roll" if the unit was not back on-line within the hour. However, Jack Smith, the
maintenance superintendent, had heard it all before-nothing ever happened as a result of Henson's temper
tantrums. "Serves him right," he thought. "Henson is uncooperative when we want to perform scheduled
maintenance, so it doesn't get done and equipment goes down."
At that moment, however, Henson was genuinely furious over the impact that the breakdown would have on
his process yield figures. Meeting with plant manager Beth Conner, he was charging that all the maintenance
department did was "sit around" and play cards like firemen waiting for an alarm to send them to a three-alarm
blaze across town. The "fix-it" approach to maintenance was costing the plant throughput that was vital to
meeting standard costs and avoiding serious variances. Foreign competitors were delivering high-quality
fibers in less time and at lower prices. Conner had already been called on the carpet at corporate headquarters
over output levels that were significantly below the budgeted numbers. The business cycle contained
predictable seasonal variations. That meant building inventories that would be carried for months, tying up
scarce capital, a characteristic of most continuous processes. Monthly shipments would laook bad. Year-to-date
shipments would look even worse because of machine breakdowns and lost output to date. Conner knew that
something had to be done to develop machine reliability. Capacity on demand was needed to respond to
growing foreign competition. Unreliable production equipment was jeopardizing the company's TQM effort by
causing process variations that affected both first-quality product yields and on-time deliveries, but no one
seemed to have the answer to the problem of machine breakdowns.
The maintenance department operated much like a fire department, rushing to a breakdown with a swarm of
mechanics, some who disassembled the machine while others pored over wiring schematics and still others
hunted for spare parts in the maintenance warehouse. Eventually, they would have the machine back up,
though sometimes only after working through the night to get the production line going again. Maintenance
had always been done this way. However, with new competitors, machine reliability had suddenly become a
major barrier to competing successfully.
Transcribed Image Text:Worldwide Chemical Company Jack Smith wiped the perspiration from his face. It was another scorching-hot summer day, and one of the four process refrigeration units was down. The units were critical to the operation of Worldwide Chemical Company's Fibers Plant, which produces synthetic fibers and polymer flake for a global market. Before long, Al Henson, the day-shift production superintendent, was on the intercom, shouting his familiar proclamation that "heads would roll" if the unit was not back on-line within the hour. However, Jack Smith, the maintenance superintendent, had heard it all before-nothing ever happened as a result of Henson's temper tantrums. "Serves him right," he thought. "Henson is uncooperative when we want to perform scheduled maintenance, so it doesn't get done and equipment goes down." At that moment, however, Henson was genuinely furious over the impact that the breakdown would have on his process yield figures. Meeting with plant manager Beth Conner, he was charging that all the maintenance department did was "sit around" and play cards like firemen waiting for an alarm to send them to a three-alarm blaze across town. The "fix-it" approach to maintenance was costing the plant throughput that was vital to meeting standard costs and avoiding serious variances. Foreign competitors were delivering high-quality fibers in less time and at lower prices. Conner had already been called on the carpet at corporate headquarters over output levels that were significantly below the budgeted numbers. The business cycle contained predictable seasonal variations. That meant building inventories that would be carried for months, tying up scarce capital, a characteristic of most continuous processes. Monthly shipments would laook bad. Year-to-date shipments would look even worse because of machine breakdowns and lost output to date. Conner knew that something had to be done to develop machine reliability. Capacity on demand was needed to respond to growing foreign competition. Unreliable production equipment was jeopardizing the company's TQM effort by causing process variations that affected both first-quality product yields and on-time deliveries, but no one seemed to have the answer to the problem of machine breakdowns. The maintenance department operated much like a fire department, rushing to a breakdown with a swarm of mechanics, some who disassembled the machine while others pored over wiring schematics and still others hunted for spare parts in the maintenance warehouse. Eventually, they would have the machine back up, though sometimes only after working through the night to get the production line going again. Maintenance had always been done this way. However, with new competitors, machine reliability had suddenly become a major barrier to competing successfully.
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Follow-up Questions
Read through expert solutions to related follow-up questions below.
Follow-up Question
  1. Construct an alternative to the current operations approach of the maintenance department.
Solution
Bartleby Expert
SEE SOLUTION
Knowledge Booster
Lean manufacturing
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, operations-management and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781337406659
Author:
WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:
Cengage,
Operations Management
Operations Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259667473
Author:
William J Stevenson
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations and Supply Chain Management (Mcgraw-hi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781259666100
Author:
F. Robert Jacobs, Richard B Chase
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education
Business in Action
Business in Action
Operations Management
ISBN:
9780135198100
Author:
BOVEE
Publisher:
PEARSON CO
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781285869681
Author:
Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Production and Operations Analysis, Seventh Editi…
Operations Management
ISBN:
9781478623069
Author:
Steven Nahmias, Tava Lennon Olsen
Publisher:
Waveland Press, Inc.