1. Analyze the following two countries with linear production technologiesand one factor of production. The production technology is given by thefollowing labor requirements:Hot Dogs (labor per unit)Maple Syrup (labor per gallon)USA Canada1321Each country has 600 hours of labor.a. Which country has the absolute advantage in producing hot dogs?Explain.b. What is the opportunity cost of hot dogs in the US? In Canada?c. Which country has a comparative advantage in each good? Explain.d. What is the range of prices for each good under which both countrieswill gain from trade? Explain.e. Suppose that the world price of a unit of hot dogs is 1 gallon of maplesyrup. Draw a large, clear new graph for each country (put hot dogson the X axis) showing the autarky equilibrium and the free tradeequilibrium (including the trade triangle showing the levels ofimports and exports).f. Who gains from free trade in this model? Briefly explain why or whynot.

The following table shows the labor requirements in the production of hot dogs and maple syrup in…

1. Analyze the following two countries with linear production technologies and one factor of production. The production technology is given by the following labor requirements: Hot Dogs (labor per unit) Maple Syrup (labor per gallon) USA Canada 1 3 2 1 Each country has 600 hours of labor. a. Which country has the absolute advantage in producing hot dogs? Explain. b. What is the opportunity cost of hot dogs in the US? In Canada? c. Which country has a comparative advantage in each good? Explain.

1. Analyze the following two countries with linear production technologies and one factor of production. The production technology is given by the following labor requirements: Hot Dogs (labor per unit) Maple Syrup (labor per gallon) USA Canada 1 3 2 1 Each country has 600 hours of labor. a. Which country has the absolute advantage in producing hot dogs? Explain. b. What is the opportunity cost of hot dogs in the US? In Canada? c. Which country has a comparative advantage in each good? Explain.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

14th Edition

ISBN:9780190931919

Author:NEWNAN

Publisher:NEWNAN

Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions

Section: Chapter Questions

Problem 1QTC

See similar textbooks

Similar questions

The table above shows the daily production possibilities for China and Malaysia in producing trucks and coffee using the same amount of resources. Based on the data provided, which of the following terms of trade are mutually beneficial for the two countries? A. 1 ton of coffee for 3 trucks B. 1 ton of coffee for 4 trucks C. 1 ton of coffee for 5 trucks D. 1 truck for 1 ton of coffee E. 1 truck for 5 ton of coffee
part C D need
The table below gives the number of cars, or of coal tons, that a typical worker in the given country can produce per week. (a) Which country, if either, has an absolute advantage? (b) What is the comparative advantage, if one exists, for each country? (c) Calculate potential gains from trade, if any exist. (d) What lesson do you draw this example about the gains from trade? Country Cars Coal tons Kazakhstan 6 6 Russia 3 3
***Please look at the screenshot for graphs*** Fill in the charts below with values based on the two Production Possibilities Frontiers above. Motor Vehicle Production in the United States (in millions) Cars Trucks 0 4 0 Motor Vehicle Production in Mexico (in millions) Cars Trucks 0 2 0 Which country has the absolute advantage in producing cars? Which country has the absolute advantage in producing trucks? Which country has the comparative advantage in producing cars? Which country has the comparative advantage in producing trucks? Should these two countries trade? Why or Why not?
England and Scotland both produce scones and sweaters. Suppose that an English works can produce 50 scones per hour or 1 sweater per hour. Suppose that a Scottish worker can produce 40 scones per hour or 2 sweaters per hour. a. Which country has the absolute advantage in the production of each good? Which country has the comparative advantage? b. If England and Scotland decide to trade, which commodity will Scotland trade to England? Explain. c. If a Scottish worker could produce only 1 sweater per hour, would Scotland still gain from trade? Would England still gain from trade? Explain.
If a country closes off to trade and notices that the number of firms in an industry doubles in size, what economic theory would help us explain this phenomenon? A. Stolper-Samuelson. B. Melitz. C. Ricardian. D. Cournot. Explain your answer in up to 200 words and using a diagram
Food (Comparative Advantage) The consumption possibilities frontiers shown by the blue lines in the following exhibit assume terms of trade of 1 unit of clothing for 1 unit of food. What would the consumption possibilities frontiers look like if the terms of trade were 1 unit of clothing for 2 units of food? Production (and Consumption) Possibility Frontiers with Trade (Millions of Units Per Day) (a) United States (b) Izodia 600 500- 400 600 500 U 400 300 200 U 100 Food 300 200 100 13 0 100 200 300 400 Clothing 0 100 200 300 400 Clothing
In Bangladesh, it takes 300 labor hours to produce one TV set and 5 hours of labor to produce one unit of textiles. The unit labor costs for the same goods in the U.S. are 100 labor hours to produce one TV and 2 labor hour to produce one unit of textiles. Tv Textiles 100 2 Bangladesh 300 5 U.S. Which country has an absolute advantage in the production of textiles? Which country has a comparative advantage in textiles? The * has an absolute advantage in the production of textiles as its unit labor costs are * than that of Bangladesh. The opportunity cost of textiles in the U.S is and in Bangladesh is * has a comparative advantage in textiles. Determine the range of international relative price of TV sets with respect to textiles. The range for the international relative price of the TV sets with respect to textiles is and
Wheat 8 Paul 10 Corn Wheat 6 4 Cliff Refer to Figure 3-1. What do the two producers have a comparative advantage in? Corn Paul has a comparative advantage in both wheat and corn. Paul has a comparative advantage in wheat, and Cliff has a comparative advantage in corn. Cliff has a comparative advantage in wheat, and Paul has a comparative advantage in corn. Cliff has a comparative advantage in both wheat and corn.
Assume that the US can produce corn at a lower opportunity cost than South Korea and South Korea can produce cars at a lower opportunity cost than the US. Which of the following is not true? a. south korea should specialize production in cars b. both countries have a comparative advantage c. the us should specialize production in corn d. the us has an absolute advantage in production of corn and cars
Question 1 a. Explain how comparative advantage and opportunity cost affect trade. b. In your opinion, state if you believe whether or not a country can have a comparative advantage in all goods.
I don't understand the second part of this homework. If Frankie and Johnny completely specialize according to comparative advantage, what will happen to the amount of eggs and milk? I have the opportunity cost calculated to understand who should do what in this case. But what will I do to that number?