. Some scientists vigorously rejected Darwin’sideas when On the Origin of Species was published. Richard Owen (1860), perhaps the mostrespected biologist in England, wrote (amongmany other objections): “Are all the recognisedorganic forms of the present date, so differentiated, so complex, so superior to conceivableprimordial simplicity of form and structure,as to testify to the effects of Natural Selectioncontinuously operating through untold time?Unquestionably not. The most numerous livingbeings … are precisely those which offer suchsimplicity of form and structure, as best agrees…with that ideal prototype from which…vegetableand animal life might have diverged.” Howmight Darwin, or you, argue against Owen’slogic?
. Some scientists vigorously rejected Darwin’s
ideas when On the Origin of Species was published. Richard Owen (1860), perhaps the most
respected biologist in England, wrote (among
many other objections): “Are all the recognised
organic forms of the present date, so differentiated, so complex, so superior to conceivable
primordial simplicity of form and structure,
as to testify to the effects of Natural Selection
continuously operating through untold time?
Unquestionably not. The most numerous living
beings … are precisely those which offer such
simplicity of form and structure, as best agrees…
with that ideal prototype from which…vegetable
and animal life might have diverged.” How
might Darwin, or you, argue against Owen’s
logic?
Trending now
This is a popular solution!
Step by step
Solved in 2 steps
