. Let G: {0, 1}^→ {0, 1}³ be a secure length-tripling PRG. For each function below, state whether it is also a secure PRG. If the function is a secure PRG, give a proof. If not, then describe a successful distinguisher and explicitly compute its advantage. When we write a||b||c := G(s), each of a, b, c have length 1. H(s): (a) x|ly||z := G(s) return G(x)||G(z) H(s): (b) xyz = G(s) return x|ly (c) H(s): x := G(s) y := G(s) return x|ly (d) (e) H(s): x := G(s) y := G(0¹) return x||y H(s): x := G(s) y := G(0¹) return x + y

icon
Related questions
Question
. Let G : {0, 1}^ → {0, 1}³ª be a secure length-tripling PRG. For each function below, state
whether it is also a secure PRG. If the function is a secure PRG, give a proof. If not, then
describe a successful distinguisher and explicitly compute its advantage. When we write
a|lb||c = G(s), each of a, b, c have length λ.
(a)
(b)
(c)
H(s):
x|ly||z:= G(s)
return G(x)||G(z)
H(s):
x|ly||z := G(s)
return x|ly
H(s):
x := G(s)
y := G(s)
return x ||y
(d)
(e)
H(s):
x := G(s)
y := G(0¹)
return x|ly
H(s):
x := G(s)
y := G(0¹)
return x + y
Transcribed Image Text:. Let G : {0, 1}^ → {0, 1}³ª be a secure length-tripling PRG. For each function below, state whether it is also a secure PRG. If the function is a secure PRG, give a proof. If not, then describe a successful distinguisher and explicitly compute its advantage. When we write a|lb||c = G(s), each of a, b, c have length λ. (a) (b) (c) H(s): x|ly||z:= G(s) return G(x)||G(z) H(s): x|ly||z := G(s) return x|ly H(s): x := G(s) y := G(s) return x ||y (d) (e) H(s): x := G(s) y := G(0¹) return x|ly H(s): x := G(s) y := G(0¹) return x + y
Expert Solution
trending now

Trending now

This is a popular solution!

steps

Step by step

Solved in 3 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS