. A Malthusian and a modern economist walk into a bar and converse as follows: MALTHUSIAN: I bet you $1,000 that I can make the average patron in this bar wealthier with a simple trick. MODERN ECONOMIST: I agree to your bet, and bet you $2,000 that I can do a better job. Thus, the Malthusian proceeds to murder half of the patrons, cleanly disposing of their bodies. The modern economist, on the other hand, replaces the bartender with a robot. How can we explain this ridiculous situation? (A) The Malthusian believes that killing people raises per-capita wealth, while the economist believes that technological improvements raise per-capita wealth. (B) The Malthusian believes that the agricultural commodities used in beer are scarce, and should be preserved; the modern economist believes that technological im- provements raise per-capita wealth. (C) There is no underlying logic to their actions. (D) The Malthusian and modern economists are both soyjacks and NPCs in the larger world of transhumanist dynamics.

ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
14th Edition
ISBN:9780190931919
Author:NEWNAN
Publisher:NEWNAN
Chapter1: Making Economics Decisions
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 1QTC
icon
Related questions
Question

need help with macroeconomic question 

23. A Malthusian and a modern economist walk into a bar and converse as follows: MALTHUSIAN: I bet you $1,000 that I can make the average patron in this bar wealthier with a simple trick.
MODERN ECONOMIST: I agree to your bet, and bet you $2,000 that I can do a better job.
Thus, the Malthusian proceeds to murder half of the patrons, cleanly disposing of their bodies. The modern economist, on the other hand, replaces the bartender with a robot. How can we explain this ridiculous situation?
(A) The Malthusian believes that killing people raises per-capita wealth, while the economist believes that technological improvements raise per-capita wealth.
(B) The Malthusian believes that the agricultural commodities used in beer are scarce, and should be preserved; the modern economist believes that technological im- provements raise per-capita wealth.
(C) There is no underlying logic to their actions.
(D) The Malthusian and modern economists are both soyjacks and NPCs in the larger world of transhumanist dynamics.

Expert Solution
Step 1

Economics deals with the allocation of scarce resources among humans with unlimited wants. Macroeconomics is a part of economics that deals with production, decision, and allocation concerning the whole economy.

Since economics deals with the allocation of scarce resources among humans, more focus was put on developing models that would study and theorize the economic situations of any nation. Economists focused on models that would predict the output growth of a nation through the output model, explain the effect of price changes on consumption and spending patterns. 

steps

Step by step

Solved in 2 steps

Blurred answer
Similar questions
  • SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
ENGR.ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Economics
ISBN:
9780190931919
Author:
NEWNAN
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Principles of Economics (12th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134078779
Author:
Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. Oster
Publisher:
PEARSON
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Engineering Economy (17th Edition)
Economics
ISBN:
9780134870069
Author:
William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick Koelling
Publisher:
PEARSON
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:
9781305585126
Author:
N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Managerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-…
Economics
ISBN:
9781259290619
Author:
Michael Baye, Jeff Prince
Publisher:
McGraw-Hill Education