February 16 2024 SWP 331

docx

School

Toronto Metropolitan University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

132

Subject

Sociology

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by ChiefCaterpillar3709

Report
Anti Oppressive Practice in Social Work Theories of Practice Feb 16, 2024 AOP: HISTORY, PRINCIPLES AND QUESTIONS This week: Anti Oppressive Approaches Healy Baines readings Anti Oppressive practice is what you take with you Establish value in a place or space workplace According to Healy, AOP is the latest wave of the modern, critical social work tradition “Critical social workers seek to understand and address the impact of social structures on the problems facing service users” (p. 183) “Wanting people to come together, name oppression(s) and do something about it collectively…” “Critical social work includes structural, radical,anti-oppressive, anti-racist and feminist forms of social work (Healy, p. 185)” Anti oppressive practice originated in the United Kingdom in 1980’s/early 1990’s with Dalrymple and Burke, Dominelli because of their social climate. Influenced by all forms of critical social work & sociology, social movements, some aspects of psychology (self- reflection) Also influenced by class and social structures According to Baines (2007), reaction to ‘mainstreaming’ of social work, rise of neo- liberalism in the 1980’s Part of a move beyond class (Healy, p. 188) and arguing that the personal experience of oppression just as important as structural analysis What is Anti Oppressive Practice? Some may call it a theory or a set of practices, According to Healey
Anti Oppressive Practice in Social Work Theories of Practice Feb 16, 2024 “A form of practice which addresses social divisions and structural inequalities ...it embodies a person-centred philosophy, an egalitarian value system and a focus on process and outcome...” (p. 179, 192) Benjamin (in Baines, 2007): AOP is transformative practice ...it resists, in multiple ways, standard practices that support inequities and oppressions’ (Benjamin in Baines, 2007, p. 196). Core Assumptions/Beliefs Must recognize multiple forms of oppression (racism, ageism, sexism), that they intersect and that all are harmful. Oppression tied to unequal power relations and divisions in society. Must critically reflect making sure we do not add to a person’s suffering through our practice, teaching and research. Social work is always political and must include a broad range of interventions. There is no time-limit on the work, no enforced optimism or focus on fixing .... Socia Intersectionality Is how social structures come together to intersect the experiences of marginalized individuals or groups. Doing Anti oppressive practice 1. Critical self-reflection How do you identify/what have you lived through How might that limit or enhance what you do/see/change? 2. Critical assessment of users’ experiences of oppression Think big picture and ask what has been done to the service user(s)? What oppression(s) are service users contending with? What language is being used to frame the ‘problem’ and why? How can you reframe the problem so it is seen as shared and solutions are about individual empowerment and collective struggles
Anti Oppressive Practice in Social Work Theories of Practice Feb 16, 2024 More principles 3. Empower Service users 4. Work in partnership 5. Minimal Intervention Doing AOP Imagine yourself as an Anti-Oppressive worker at Sistering working with under- housed, homeless and marginalized women. A racialized woman comes in, sounding angry and holding plastic bags. She also has a very challenging odour around her. She approaches you during the free lunch program. • Using critical self-reflection, discuss what would challenge you here and how your history would limit or enhance what you do/see/change. And if you could help her? • Using critical assessment, discuss what oppression(s) the user may be contending with. What language is being used to frame the ‘problem’ and why? How do you stick to the minimal intervention principle when there is a high risk of death or harm? (Healy 201, 2014) Critiques Are the “us and them” categories implied by anti-oppressive practice too polarizing? What if the user’s consciousness is raised and it doesn’t match yours? What if AOP gets watered down? (to liberal pluralism) What if race does not receive sufficient attention? Hierarchy of oppression – groups vying for recognition of their experience of oppression Homogeneity of experience – fails to recognize uniqueness Collective solutions can sometimes hide or ignore different needs
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Anti Oppressive Practice in Social Work Theories of Practice Feb 16, 2024 May not recognize the process of readiness for (service user) to engage in resistance The privileging of resistance What about different points of view? Desire to eradicate all oppression ; recognize intersecting oppression Vs. Desire to have unique experiences of oppression acknowledged Need to ‘hold ground’ – sometimes can put us in conflict; and, might cause us to miss opportunities Anti oppressive practice core themes Macro/micro social relations Everyday experiences shaped by oppression and resistance SW a highly contested/political practice last paragraph SW an active political process Individual work and social transformation Build allies Theory and practice based on struggles/need of folks oppressed EPISTEMOLOGY (P. 13) AOP is a heterodox term Not confirming with AOP is a term that doesn’t conform with accepted standards Epistemology: theory, the study of knowledge AOP & others stress the existence of structures Structures: social relations made by people (therefore can be changed by people) MANAGING AND SUPERVISING SOCIAL WORK From p 19 “...many social justice-oriented social workers tend to avoid management positions, perhaps assuming that management power is
Anti Oppressive Practice in Social Work Theories of Practice Feb 16, 2024 exclusively an oppressive form of power”. DIFFERENCES FROM MAINSTREAM PRACTICES Both use respectful & constructive approaches Mainstream: theories that rest on the belief in the neutrality of social and economic systems; yes, can ease some difficulty/suffering, but depoliticize social problems FROM P. 25 As social justice-oriented social workers we can humanize ourselves, our work practices and our communities, liberate and politicize our workplaces and transform and dignify our existence through the creative, collective and ongoing pursuit of peace, equity, and social justice.