SOC 326 7-2 FINAL PROJECT
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
SOC 326
Subject
Sociology
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
11
Uploaded by MateBat1547
1
7-2 Final Project
7-2 Final Project: Milestone Four: Final Product Jessica Lee Howell
Southern New Hampshire University 23 April 2023
2
7-2 Final Project
Furry fandom is a subculture that consists of individuals who are interested in anthropomorphic or cartoon animals. They usually identify with these characters. This subculture
includes diverse individuals who are becoming popular in society and are also negatively stigmatized. It is not unusual for a stigma to be created around a subculture that challenges societal norms of gender, sexuality, and appearance. The focus on this paper is going to centralize on the topic of the subculture of furries. The phenomenon has a mixture of perspectives that are both positive and negative. The subculture should not be misperceived as a counterculture. Society can view this subculture as deviant; however, the furry community values align with current society standards. They just express these values in their own special way. American criminologist, Albert Cohen, suggests that subcultures arise in highly
differentiated, complex societies when a certain amount of people encounter similar problems
living within the prevailing culture (Wickert, 2022). According to his view, subcultures share
problems that have solutions that are viewed as problems by the dominant culture (Wickert,
2022). The furry community represents values of tolerance, diversity, acceptance, and open-
mindedness. These interests should not be portrayed as deviant behavior. The focus should be on
the deviant behaviors that might be prevalent in the community, the individuals that take their
fandom to the extremes. The deviant behavior that might occur within this subculture define this
fandom. There might be questions of why an individual would be apart of this subculture. Furry
fandom is a way for people to live in a child-like fantasy, creating a sense of belonging amongst
others who have shared interests. A social support network is then formed that serves as an
escape for these individuals to dress in anthropomorphic animal characters with human
3
7-2 Final Project
personalities and characteristics. There continues to be mixed views on whether this community
is deviant or not. The subculture would fit into Merton’s Theory of adaption. They fit the
adaption of rebellion. The reason for this claim is that rebels are correlated with rejecting valued
goals and the means to achieve them with their own personal goals. There are cases when furries
reject societal norms and experience negative backlash for rejection of socially approved
behaviors. The conflict lies with the physical appearance and the unique behaviors expressed by
these individuals. Their appearance and unique personalities do not classify them as deviant
members to society. The social media portrayals formed a negative stigma surrounding these
people which are inaccurate.
The negative representation is that it is unnatural to fetishize within this type of
community and that they partake in deviant behaviors. These ideas cause the problem of the
subculture to be misunderstood. The social group is a collection of similar interests such as
fantasy, artistic expression, and performance-based arts. They were innovative in using the word
“furries” for their animalistic personas. The members themselves believe that they are normal
with normal interests but are judged by others outside the community. Their subculture provides
a powerful sense of belonging. They advocate for acceptance and understanding while
disapproving of dangerous behaviors. This type of fandom is only viewed as deviant because of
the stigma. They are going against the traditional mold and freely expressing fantasies different
from the average individual.
A furry’s fantasy is expressing themselves while wearing an animatronic suit. It is
important to know that a furry still identifies themselves as humans while wearing the animal-
like costumes. Their behavior is not deviant, it is a rebellious act against the norms of society on
ideal fantasies. They have decided not to adhere to valued norms for the sake of their own
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
7-2 Final Project
personal values. Although the community is misperceived,the feeling of isolation can cause
deviant behavior within the group. However, these behaviors do not represent the behaviors of
the whole subculture. Whoever created the stigma remains unknown which creates a false
depiction of furry fandom.
This subculture was formed by individuals with a shared interest in anthropomorphic
animals. It is supposed to be a safety/comfort zone for people of mutual interests to be able to
express themselves without judgement. Being a furry is not deviant but should be considered as
social diversion. Their creative expression is harmless. The poor portrayal and social interactions
have caused a misrepresentation of this fandom and the media plays a big role. The moral
concerns influenced how furries were recognized. The people were falsely labeled, and the
subculture was classified as being inauthentic. The problem is that the real meaning behind the
fantasy is ignored. The members should be compared to the sci-fi fandom that they originated
from. There is a lack of correlation with furries being associated with high-risk behaviors and is
simply a safe place for like-minded individuals to express themselves freely. The subculture is
becoming more popular and familiar. The mainstream can influence the acceptance of this
fandom because of the familiarity. Observing other’s acceptance of the group can influence
descriptive norms. This is why it is important to change the misconceptions on furry fandom
being considered deviant behavior. The change will help furries feel accepted and normal
members of society. The community is the same as the other subcultures. They only differ
because they go against societal norms in an unconventional way. The fury community wants
society to accept them by social legitimizing the subculture. Unfortunately, the label of deviant
5
7-2 Final Project
lingers on these individuals. The community itself is not deviant but a small portion of members
can potentially be. The push for acceptance, the negative stigma, and challenging social norms is perceived
as deviant by society. There is not enough awareness spread on the misconceptions of the
community and the media has created this false narrative on furry fandom. According to the
author, Jeansonne, furries are individuals who have an interest in anthropomorphic animals and
are occasionally portrayed in the media as a socially or sexually deviant subculture
(Jeasonne,2012). The dark sexual deviance is the main concern of the public. Members of
society need to be educated on how there are two subtypes of furries. It is crucial because we
will be able to distinguish the difference between what part of the fantasy is deviant and what
part is not. The first subtype are people who dress as animals because they see it as an artistic
form of expression (Jeansonne, 2012). The second subtype are people who dress like animals to
fulfill their sexual fantasy (Jeansonne, 2012). The media is to blame for only portraying the more deviant subtype. It is inevitable for
fetishisms to not occur within the fandom, however, the majority of the furries do not identify
with this sexual theme. The members associated with sexual fantasies are called yiff-furries.
Yiffing is the term to describe a fetish of having sex while dressed in a full fur (animal) suit
(Eller,2020). The subculture is more complex and there is a lack of knowledge in society about
the community. Having knowledge about the aspects of furries is important to discuss within the
debate on the behavior being deviant. What should be known is the disagreement amongst the
furries. The non-yiff furries are proud to express the ideas and values of their community. The
yiff are more likely to hide and deny their place as a furry. An average member of society would
not know the many aspects of this subculture, so how can we identify it as deviant behavior?
6
7-2 Final Project
Existential sociology and the symbolic interactionist perspectives views furries as people
who use their personal, social, and cultural resources to create their “fursonas”, to express
personality trats that they could not usually express (Jeasonne,2012). To better understand this
community, research needs to be done. Existential sociology is the study and understanding of
individuals’ existence and remains unbiased (JSTOR, n.d). On the outside looking into a
community, it is easy to believe myths or follow false narratives surrounding the topic. The truth
about the furry community needs to be known and properly represented for the sake of the
individuals developing deviant behaviors due to rejection. Another perspective on the misconception of furries, explains that furries tend to be
portrayed as these perverted fetishists when the reality is that the subculture is about playful
escapism and having a fascination to linking humans to animals (Guardian News and Media,
2016). The representation of furry fandom is inauthentic. The art and creativity of the community
is not emphasized enough but the negative attributes are. The positive aspects should be
mentioned along with the negative aspects. What makes furry fandom unique from other
fandoms is that they are not consumers, but rather creators (Guardian News and Media, 2016).
Instead of promoting distress and high-risk behaviors, rather the group promotes positive change
while being in their unconventional appearance and social diversions. It is a creative community that involves many aspects, and they dedicate most of their
time to their community. The lifestyle consists of a lot of work, money, and dedication to
maintain their “fursona”. Their aesthetic is the foundation of the individual’s identity in the
community. They should not feel shameful or considered deviant for their identity. Another
popular argument is that furries are mentally unstable and the media uses this claim as a reason
for the behavior to be deviant. According to several studies, there is no huge marginal difference
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
7
7-2 Final Project
regarding mental health problems amongst furries compared to non-furries (Aaron, 2017). Many
people do not realize how popular anthropomorphism is. There are accurate stereotypes such as
furries consisting of 80% male, interest in science or tech, and have a disproportionate share of
not identifying as heterosexual (Guardian News and Media, 2016). Previously mentioned, there is only a small percentage of members that would be
considered mentally unhealthy. The subtype that focuses on sexual desires could possibly
struggle from gender identity disorder. Gender identity disorder is when a person does not feel
like they belong to their biological sex and their gender identity. The primary focus of this
fandom is self-identity and is taken seriously. Their gender expression, “fursonas”, are the main
contributing factor to the community. When debating the acceptance of furry fandom, gender
identity disorder should be considered in the decision-making of the behavior being deviant. The
subculture is about identity, not sex. There are parallels involving the disorder that pertain to the
transgender community. There have been transgender individuals who have admitted that they
feel as if they were born the wrong gender. Similarly, some furries feel as if they were born into
the wrong species. These thoughts and feelings can be classified as species identity disorder
(Guardian News and Media, 2016). The association of this mental health disorder can cause society to view this subculture as
abnormal, which can lead them to believe that the behavior is deviant. Keep in mind only some
of furries struggle with their identity. Other than the debate of mental health issues being a
concern in the community, fetish/sexual argumentation is as well. Sexual themes are present as a
subtype of the subculture. There was a study done that surveyed 334 male furries that asked
questions based on sexual orientation, sexual interests, and sexual motivation. 84% of the
participants reported they were gay and 99% admitted that there was a degree of sexual
8
7-2 Final Project
motivation being a furry. Also, the data tracked a pattern of sexual interests consistent with an
ETII (Erotic Target Identity Inversion) involving anthropomorphic animals (Hsu & Bailey,
2019). Although, the results of the study proved typical stereotypes, the furry community could
have ben misrepresented. The limitations are that the sample size was small, only men were
surveyed, and the geographical region could play a factor. There is some possibility of accuracy
from this study. The majority of furries identify as male, and one-quarter identify as female (
1.3
sex, gender, and Gender Identity
, 2022). Also, there is a high percentage of transgender, gender
fluid, and non-binary furries compared to those apart of the general population (
1.3 sex, gender,
and Gender Identity
, 2022). Furthermore, the question is the media accurately representing the
furry fandom subculture? The media has expressed the mental health concerns of the members,
gender or species identity disorder, and the sexual fantasies/fetishes that can possibly attract
outside individuals. The media focuses on the problems that occur within the community, but as
a unit, when the issue is with the subtype. The whole subculture should not be defined by the
small portion that might be considered deviant. The furry community has been claimed as
individuals suffering from abnormal mental health issues. There is no denying that there is
deviant behavior that occurs within the community but that happens in every community. The
positive side and the negative side should be clearly distinguished to avoid misconceptions of the
subculture. Every individual is unique within the community and contextual aspects need to be
considered. Furries are not a homogenous group and there are varying levels of identification
within their fandom (Austin,2018). The question that is left, is how do we classify these
individuals using one word? There is no issue classifying the individuals within the collective,
9
7-2 Final Project
it’s the negative stigma surrounding the collective that’s the problem. There is a spectrum of
multiple interests within the fandom. However, the main interests are the mutual vision of
friendship, creative expression, and the feeling of belonging. There are many perceptions
centralizing on the topic of furry fandom and is miscued regularly. There is some accuracy in
what the media portrays about the community, but they do not include all the aspects of the
subculture.
For the normalization of this fandom to happen, there needs to be an analysis on the
possible functions that might occur. The latent functions would be seeing more furries partake in
social functions that are apart of the general population. The social functions would consist of
going to places such as bars and clubs while in their “fursona”. It would become more popular to
come across furry profiles on social media and developing friendships with them despite the
difference of interests. Manifest functions would be educating general society on furry fandom
which would increase the likelihood of normalization. Overall, the question is if furry fandom considered a deviant group? There are a variety
of opinions on the topic and the answer is both yes and no. There is a subtype of subculture that
is focused promoting a sense of belonging and feeling comfortable expressing their unique
creativity. This view would be considered non-deviant. Opposed to the view of some individuals
having a species identity disorder and/or having sex/fetishes while in their “fursona”. This view
can be considered as deviant. Raising awareness on all aspects of furry fandom will encourage
normalization of the subculture. The community needs to be viewed as a collective but there is a
need to understand the parts that make up the whole.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
10
7-2 Final Project
References
1.3 Sex, Gender, and Gender Identity - Furscience
. (2022, October 12). Furscience. https://furscience.com/research-findings/demographics/1-3-sex-and-gender/
Aaron, M. (2017, May 12). More Than Just a Pretty Face: Unmasking Furry Fandom
.
Psychology Today.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/standard-deviations/201705/
more-just-pretty-face-unmasking-furry-fandom#:~:text=Despite%20this%20misconception%2C
%20evidence%20shows%20that%20furries%20are,well-adjusted%20as%20anyone%20else
%20in%20the%20general%20population
.
Austin, Jessica R. (2018) Identity construction in the Furry fandom. Doctoral thesis, Anglia
Ruskin University.
Clinard, M. B., & Meier, R. F. (2015). Sociology of Deviant Behavior (15th Edition). Cengage
Learning US. https://mbsdirect.vitalsource.com/books/9781305537347
11
7-2 Final Project
Eller, J. L., & Eller, A. R. (2020). Furries. In Deviance Today
. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003053286-22
Guardian News and Media. (2016, February 4). It's not about sex, it's about identity: Why furries
are unique among fan cultures. The Guardian. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from
https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2016/feb/04/furry-fandom-subculture-animal-costumes
Hsu, K.J., Bailey, J.M. The “Furry” Phenomenon: Characterizing Sexual Orientation, Sexual
Motivation, and Erotic Target Identity Inversions in Male Furries.
Arch Sex Behav
48
, 1349–
1369 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1303-7
Jeansonne, S. A. (2012).
Breaking down stereotypes: A look at the performance of self-identity
within the furry community
(Unpublished thesis). Texas State University-San Marcos, San
Marcos, Texas.
https://digital.library.txstate.edu/handle/10877/4398
Existential Sociology on JSTOR
. (n.d.). https://www.jstor.org/stable/4105970
Wickert, C. (2022, April 18).
Subcultural theory (Cohen) - SozTheo
. SozTheo.
https://soztheo.de/theories-of-crime/learning-subculture/subcultural-theory-cohen/?lang=en
Related Documents
Recommended textbooks for you

Social Psychology (10th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:9780134641287
Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:Pearson College Div

Introduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:9780393639407
Author:Deborah Carr, Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. Appelbaum
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company

The Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis...
Sociology
ISBN:9781305503076
Author:Earl R. Babbie
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien...
Sociology
ISBN:9780134477596
Author:Saferstein, Richard
Publisher:PEARSON

Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:9780134205571
Author:James M. Henslin
Publisher:PEARSON

Society: The Basics (14th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:9780134206325
Author:John J. Macionis
Publisher:PEARSON
Recommended textbooks for you
- Social Psychology (10th Edition)SociologyISBN:9780134641287Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. SommersPublisher:Pearson College DivIntroduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)SociologyISBN:9780393639407Author:Deborah Carr, Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. AppelbaumPublisher:W. W. Norton & CompanyThe Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis...SociologyISBN:9781305503076Author:Earl R. BabbiePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien...SociologyISBN:9780134477596Author:Saferstein, RichardPublisher:PEARSONSociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)SociologyISBN:9780134205571Author:James M. HenslinPublisher:PEARSONSociety: The Basics (14th Edition)SociologyISBN:9780134206325Author:John J. MacionisPublisher:PEARSON

Social Psychology (10th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:9780134641287
Author:Elliot Aronson, Timothy D. Wilson, Robin M. Akert, Samuel R. Sommers
Publisher:Pearson College Div

Introduction to Sociology (Eleventh Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:9780393639407
Author:Deborah Carr, Anthony Giddens, Mitchell Duneier, Richard P. Appelbaum
Publisher:W. W. Norton & Company

The Basics of Social Research (MindTap Course Lis...
Sociology
ISBN:9781305503076
Author:Earl R. Babbie
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Criminalistics: An Introduction to Forensic Scien...
Sociology
ISBN:9780134477596
Author:Saferstein, Richard
Publisher:PEARSON

Sociology: A Down-to-Earth Approach (13th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:9780134205571
Author:James M. Henslin
Publisher:PEARSON

Society: The Basics (14th Edition)
Sociology
ISBN:9780134206325
Author:John J. Macionis
Publisher:PEARSON