Effect of NIMBY-ism towards addressing the problem of the homeless population.edited

docx

School

University of Nairobi *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

400

Subject

Sociology

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

4

Uploaded by CoachMongoose2893

Report
Surname 1 Student’s Name Professor’s Name Course Date Effect Of NIMBY-Ism Towards Addressing the Problem of The Homeless Population The homelessness crisis in the United States (US) is a pressing issue that requires immediate solutions. The "NIMBY-ism" ("Not In My Backyard") mentality presents a huge obstacle to resolving this problem. "NIMBY-ism" describes the hostility and resistance that suggested temporary shelters or permanent housing options encounter because of their closeness to existing residential zones. In the US, homelessness is both a political and a policy issue. The development of practical solutions to homelessness faces substantial obstacles due to NIMBY-ism. Numerous problems, such as property values, public safety, and the perception of higher crime rates, contribute to communities' unwillingness to accept temporary shelters or permanent housing close to their homes, exacerbating the problems that homeless people experience and feeding a cycle of marginalization. NIMBY-ism affects efforts to implement effective solutions to address homelessness, impacting the adoption of immediate relief and support for homeless individuals, such as resistance to delays and compromises in homeless access to shelter and housing. Policymakers struggle to find locations for projects because NIMBY-ism appears in every community, which results in the ineffective under-provision of social goods (Doerr 202). NIMBY-ism's reaction towards homeless shelters is most closely related to fear and prejudices whereby some individuals establish that affordable housing will lead to sitting in hazardous environments. Misperceptions and stigma surrounding homelessness frequently fuel NIMBYism, leading to fear and hostility against homeless shelters or housing initiatives. Generally, building such institutions close by is more difficult because of this stigma, which
Surname 2 reinforces the idea that homeless people are inherently dangerous. Lack of support to the homeless by most community members affects the vulnerability of the homeless affecting their access to quality healthcare services, education, and employment. NIMBY-ism establishes a pernicious obstacle to establishing affordable housing. Community members who oppose such programs put a lot of pressure on local governments, which frequently have the power to decide where homeless shelters or housing will be. Policy makers face opposition when attempting to establish affordable housing in residential areas due to members concern over their safety and perceived effect on the community. As a result, decision-makers would feel forced to put the needs of their constituency first, which might result in a lack of political will to adopt complete and successful solutions. "Push them out to the middle of the stinking desert" (Skindrud). As such, NIMBY-ism restricts the homeless population's access to necessary services by opposing the construction of shelters or housing close to residential areas. When communities oppose such changes, homeless people struggle to access these crucial supports, thus increasing their vulnerability. The creation of affordable homes is greatly affected by NIMBYism as constituent complaints over the location and approval of affordable housing frequently bombard local elected leaders. NIMBY-ism negatively affects development costs, the ability to meet local housing demands, and protracted, contentious, and unpleasant public procedures as it frustrates the implementation of integrated plans. Communities' opposition to housing alternatives or shelters being built close to their homes thwarts efforts to implement sensible policies, restrict access to shelter and support networks, feed stigma, and prevent community involvement. In order to remove barriers and advance understanding, NIMBY-ism must be defeated through education, awareness campaigns, and community development of empathy as well as developing inclusive and kind solutions that give homeless people the help and resources they need to rebuild their lives and reintegrate into society.
Surname 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Surname 4 Works Cited Anthony Doerr. To the man asleep in our driveway, who might be named Phil Erik Skindrud. Op-Ed: Southern California has the resources to solve homelessness. It chooses not to. (2018).