Quiz_ Objections to the Resurrection_ PHIL240_ Christian Evidences (B07)

pdf

School

Liberty University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

240

Subject

Religion

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

pdf

Pages

10

Uploaded by ConstableRiver11767

Report
Skip to Main Content Quiz: Objections to the Resurrection Due Oct 13 at 10:59pm Points 25 Questions 25 Time Limit 30 Minutes This quiz is no longer available as the course has been concluded. Attempt History Attempt Time Scor LATEST Attempt 1 (https://libertyuniversity.instructure.com/courses/519595/quizzes/2468129/history? version=1) 12 minutes 24 ou of 25 Correct answers are hidden. Score for this quiz: 24 out of 25 Submitted Oct 9 at 1:44pm This attempt took 12 minutes. 1 / 1 pts Question 1 When taken as a whole, the nature of the text of the gospels and the book of Acts supports a historical genre rather than a non-historical genre. True False Online Residential Athletics Sign In Request Info Apply Now Visit Us Create Guest Account
1 / 1 pts Question 2 Scientific methodology is not adequate for addressing the probability of the historical resurrection. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 3 It is just as plausible to think that Elvis was raised from the dead as to believe that Jesus was raised from the dead. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 4 The resurrection testimony was added to the Christian faith after the disciples died. True False
1 / 1 pts Question 5 While it is clear that the disciples experienced something, it is unclear from scripture whether or not they saw a material or an immaterial resurrection of Jesus, and either option is theologically compatible with New Testament doctrine. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 6 No psychological explanation discounting the resurrection of Christ can adequately explain the five facts built around the “minimal facts” approach. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 7 The discrepancies between accounts of the resurrection in the New Testament are irrelevant in refuting the general trustworthiness of the event occurring in history.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
True False 1 / 1 pts Question 8 The naturalistic explanation that Dr. Foreman called “the biggest blunder in history” is: The authorities moved the body The hallucination theory The disciples stole the body The wrong tomb theory 0 / 1 pts Question 9 Incorrect Incorrect The “swoon theory” is among the most historically plausible alternatives to the resurrection of Christ. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 10
According to Dr. Foreman, the best explanation that accounts for the minimal core facts is that Jesus really rose from the dead. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 11 In a conversation with a skeptic, it is almost always best to stay on the subject of the resurrection instead of getting pulled off track by side issues and objections. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 12 For scholars, the question regarding embellishment in the New Testament gospels is not whether legend grew after the gospels were written, but rather before they were written. True False
1 / 1 pts Question 13 The 18 century historian David Strauss was actually responsible for defeating most of the naturalistic explanations of the resurrection of Jesus. Therefore he believed it really happened. th True False 1 / 1 pts Question 14 Historical inquiry alone cannot answer the question of the cause of the resurrection of Jesus. However, the most plausible explanation for this is that God raised Jesus from the dead. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 15 The evidence supporting the idea that the empty tomb was actually a matter of the wrong tomb being searched finds strong support among ancient critics of Christianity.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
True False 1 / 1 pts Question 16 In crucifixion, the cause of death was typically the inability of the victim to continue to breathe while on the cross. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 17 Ad hominem argumentation generally can be said to be an attack on the individual rather than on the issues. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 18
The natural explanations for the resurrection are without historical criticism. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 19 The willingness of the disciples to suffer and die for the cause of Christ provides strong support that they at least believed that Jesus had indeed been raised from the dead. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 20 The “hallucination theory” can largely be discounted based upon the fact that hallucinations are private occurrences and not collective experiences. True False
1 / 1 pts Question 21 Scripture speaks of a literally, physical resurrection of Jesus. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 22 The oldest naturalistic explanation: Swoon Legend Wrong Tomb Disciples Stole the Body 1 / 1 pts Question 23 When critics propose that a combination of theories account for an explanation to the resurrection of Christ, the combination of theories typically leads to a higher degree of improbability rather than a more probable solution. True
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
False 1 / 1 pts Question 24 Paul and James testify of a resurrected Jesus due to their own experience independent from the other disciples. True False 1 / 1 pts Question 25 The naturalistic explanation for the resurrection that is answered by noting that the disciples would have died for something they knew was a lie: The authorities moved the body The hallucination theory The disciples stole the body The wrong tomb theory Quiz Score: 24 out of 25