Old Testament
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Oakland Community College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
2720
Subject
Religion
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
Pages
4
Uploaded by CountMoon4416
Alyssa Cotton
10/16/23
Bible
Topic: The Old Testament Genesis chapter one The Beginning
The social norms of the time period when Genesis 1 was written were heavily influenced by
the Israelites' patriarchal society. Men were seen as the heads of households and had authority
over women and children. This is reflected in the creation account, where God creates man first
and then woman as a helper for him (Genesis 2:18). The importance of family and community is
also emphasized in the creation account, as God commands man and woman to be fruitful and
multiply (Genesis 1:28). The Israelites faced a number of government challenges during the
time period when Genesis was written. They were often under the rule of foreign powers, such as
the Egyptians and the Babylonians. This led to a sense of national insecurity and a need for a
strong sense of identity. The creation account can be seen as a way of asserting Israelite identity
and independence. By portraying God as the creator of the world, the Israelites were able to
claim that they were not subject to the authority of any earthly ruler.
The Israelites had a rich tradition of storytelling and oral history. The creation account in
Genesis 1 is likely based on older stories and myths that were passed down from generation to
generation. The passage also reflects Israelite beliefs about the nature of God and the universe.
For example, the Israelites believed that God was a transcendent being who was separate from
the created world. They also believed that the universe was created by God's word. Scholars
believe that the author of Genesis 1 was a member of the priestly class. The passage is written in
a style that is similar to other priestly texts in the Old Testament. The author's purpose in writing
Genesis 1 was to provide a theological account of creation. The passage is not intended to be a
scientific account of the origins of the universe.
On the other hand, the literal interpretation of Genesis 1 is that the universe was created by
God in six literal days. This interpretation is based on the plain meaning of the text. Proponents
of this interpretation argue that the Bible is the word of God and that it should be interpreted
literally. They also argue that the days of creation are explicitly stated to be 24-hour days
(Genesis 1:5, 8, 13, 19, 23, 31). The non-literal interpretation of Genesis 1 is that the creation
account is a symbolic or poetic representation of the creation of the universe. This interpretation
is based on the understanding that the Bible uses a variety of literary genres, including poetry,
myth, and allegory. Proponents of this interpretation argue that the creation account is not
intended to be a scientific account of the origins of the universe. They also argue that the days of
creation are not literal days, but rather symbolic periods of time.
As far as similarities, both interpretations of Genesis 1 agree that God is the creator of the
universe. They also agree that the creation of the universe was a good and orderly process. As far
as differences, the literal interpretation of Genesis 1 differs from the non-literal interpretation in
its understanding of the days of creation. The literal interpretation holds that the days of creation
were six literal 24-hour days. The non-literal interpretation holds that the days of creation are not
literal days, but rather symbolic periods of time.
In conclusion to this section, the creation account in Genesis 1 is a complex and multifaceted
text that has been interpreted in a variety of ways throughout history. The literal interpretation
and the non-literal interpretation are two of the most common interpretations of the passage.
Both interpretations have their own strengths and weaknesses. The literal interpretation is based
on the plain meaning of the text. It is a straightforward and easy-to-understand interpretation.
However, the literal interpretation can be difficult to reconcile with modern scientific knowledge
about the origins of the universe. The non-literal interpretation is more flexible than the literal
interpretation. It allows for a more nuanced understanding of the creation account. However, the
non-literal interpretation can be more difficult to interpret than the literal interpretation.
Ultimately, the best way to interpret Genesis 1 is to consider all of the available evidence.
This includes the text of the passage itself, as well as the historical context in which it was
written. It is also important to consider the different interpretations that have been offered
throughout history. By taking all of these factors into account, we can gain a deeper
understanding of this important passage of scripture.
Key references:
Historical Context
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Coogan, Michael D. The Old Testament: A Historical and Literary Introduction. Oxford
University Press, 2009.
Friedman, Richard Elliott. Who Wrote the Bible? HarperOne, 1989.
Hayes, John H. An Introduction to the Old Testament. Yale University Press, 2015.
Interpretations
Barr, James. The Garden of Eden and the Hope of Immortality. SPCK, 1994.
Collins, John J. The Bible after Babel: Historical Criticism in a Postmodern Age. Westminster
John Knox Press, 1995.
Sailhamer, John H. Genesis 1-2: A Commentary. Baker Academic, 2009.
Concluding Section
Brueggemann, Walter. Genesis: Interpretation Commentary. Westminster John Knox Press,
1982.
Wenham, Gordon J. Genesis 1-15. Word Biblical Commentary. Vol. 1. Word Books, 1987.
Wright, Christopher J. H. The Mission of God's People: A Biblical Theology of the Old
Testament. Baker Academic, 2010.