Research Paper Topic Selection with Research Questions Assignment

docx

School

Liberty University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

703

Subject

Political Science

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by AmbassadorArt2822

Report
RESEARCH PAPER 1 Research Paper: Topic Selection with Research Questions Assignment Caitlyn C. Blakely Helms School of Government, Liberty University Author Note Caitlyn C. Blakely I have no known conflict of interest to disclose. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Caitlyn C. Blakely. Email: ccblakely@liberty.edu
RESEARCH PAPER 2 Evaluating the Effectiveness of Police Body-Worn Cameras in Enhancing Transparency and Accountability The topic explores the core of modern law enforcement operations. The way that police actions are documented and examined has changed dramatically since the introduction of police body cameras (BWCs). These tools are intended to improve accountability and transparency by providing an unbiased perspective of police-community interactions. However, the degree to which BWCs succeed in achieving these goals is still up for discussion and investigation, making it an interesting area of research. The adoption of BWCs represents a change in policy as well as a technological achievement. Their deployment touches on important areas of law enforcement and raises concerns about balancing individual rights and efficient police (Lum, 2019). Transparency is a key policy concern pertaining to BWCs. These gadgets record police encounters in unaltered audio and visual form, which is very helpful in situations where the behavior of law enforcement officials is questioned. To foster public confidence and guarantee that police officers’ acts are subject to review, this degree of openness is essential. BWCs are also viewed as instruments to improve police accountability (Koen, Newell, & Roberts, 2020). The camera's existence may affect the public’s and the officer’s behavior. It serves as a reminder that what you do is being recorded, which could result in more measured and formal relationships. This accountability viewpoint is not without its difficulties, though. There is a lot of discussion and study about the efficacy of BWCs in changing behavior or lowering instances of misconduct and the use of force. Deploying police body-worn cameras (BWCs) raises privacy concerns and sparks discussions about people’s rights during recorded interactions. Although BWCs provide insight
RESEARCH PAPER 3 into police operations, they also record scenes with citizens, often in extremely delicate circumstances. It is difficult and challenging to balance upholding law enforcement’s transparency and protecting people’s right to privacy (Nix, Todak, & Tregle, 2020). The difficulty facing law enforcement organizations is creating complex guidelines that specify when and when cameras should be used. These regulations need to consider several scenarios, from ordinary traffic stops to circumstances in private homes with a naturally higher expectation of privacy. The standards should also include data storage and access, guaranteeing that video is safe and managed in a way that preserves the privacy of individuals being recorded (Gaub & White, 2020). Key issues in the conversation about BWCs and privacy include how long video should be kept, who may see it, and when it can be shared. The importance of BWC footage in court cases emphasizes the necessity for strong policy frameworks even more. Its integrity and admissibility are crucial since this video becomes a crucial piece of evidence in trials and investigations (Lawshe, 2021). Clear and uniform rules governing the use of BWC footage in court are necessary for legal systems. These rules should cover the chain of custody for video to guarantee that it is untainted and gives a true account of what happened. The rights of everybody involved in the legal process must be safeguarded by a clear, uniform procedure for submitting BWC films as evidence. Furthermore, ignoring how this footage can affect juries’ perceptions is impossible. The presentation of BWC film in courtrooms can greatly impact trial results; therefore, its usage must be handled carefully and ethically (Crow & Smykla, 2019). Establishing and improving these principles requires cooperation between law enforcement and judicial authorities. This will ensure that BWCs fulfill their intended role of advancing justice and accountability while protecting the fundamental rights to privacy and a fair trial.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
RESEARCH PAPER 4 Police body-worn cameras (BWCs) potential to revolutionize policing methods requires a thorough grasp of these devices. Through a detailed analysis of BWCs’ impact on accountability, openness, and public confidence, scholars and policymakers can obtain important insights into how these instruments can potentially transform law enforcement. Beyond just documenting incidents, BWCs significantly impact the dynamics of police-citizen interactions and can modify behavior on both sides. This feature of BWCs is essential for influencing future policing practices by influencing training plans, directing policy decisions, and improving operational processes. Furthermore, this topic’s significance extends beyond law enforcement, involving legislators, legal experts, and the general public. Its position at the pivotal nexus of technology, law, ethics, and social justice necessitates carefully considering its ramifications. Due to its intricacy, studying BWCs is both difficult and crucial since it provides a prism through which to examine and comprehend the delicate balance that must be struck between the preservation of civil liberties and efficient law enforcement. Research Questions 1. How do police body-worn cameras affect the transparency of law enforcement operations? 2. What impact do body-worn cameras have on police accountability and public trust? 3. Are there any significant changes in police behavior or public compliance in interactions recorded by body-worn cameras?
RESEARCH PAPER 5 References Crow, M. S., & Smykla, J. O. (2019). Police Body-Worn Cameras: Research Developments on an Emerging Technology. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30(6), 865-883. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016819854789 Gaub, J. E., & White, M. D. (2020). Open to Interpretation: Confronting the Challenges of Understanding the Current State of Body-Worn Camera Research. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(1), 67-84. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12103-020- 09518-4 Koen, M. C., Newell, B. C., & Roberts, M. R. (2020). Body-worn cameras: Technological frames and project abandonment. Journal of Criminal Justice, 70, 101773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2020.101773 Lawshe, N. (2021). Investigating the influence of institutional perviousness on the adoption of body-worn cameras by United States police agencies. Policing and Society, 31(5), 545- 560. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601x.2021.1910507 Lum, C. (2019). Research on body‐worn cameras. Criminology & Public Policy, 18(1), 93-117. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1745-9133.12412 Nix, J., Todak, N., & Tregle, B. (2020). Understanding Body-Worn Camera Diffusion in U.S. Policing. Crime & Delinquency, 66(6-7), 771-791. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611120917937