CJ 112 Module 3-2 Assignment
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
112
Subject
Political Science
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
3
Uploaded by ChefPanther3449
CJ 112 Module Three Assignment Template
Complete this template by replacing the bracketed text with the relevant information.
Prompt
Student Response
Amendment: Choose the Fourth, Sixth, or Eighth Amendment
Amendment: [6
th
Amendment] Summary: In 100–150 words, summarize the amendment you chose. Be sure your summary includes all rights given to citizens in that particular amendment.
Summary: The 6th Amendment, which is a section of the US Constitution, gives people accused of crimes a number of rights. These rights include the right to a prompt and open trial, the right to an unbiased jury, the right to be informed of the charges against you, the right to cross-examine witnesses, the right to counsel, and the right to call witnesses in your defense. (Grossman 2014). In essence, the 6th Amendment guarantees that those accused of crimes will go through a fair and open legal procedure. Citizens’ Rights: Identify a real-world example of where citizens’ rights under the Bill of Rights may not be guaranteed. (Clearly explain where
citizens’ rights could conflict with the intention of criminal justice professionals to ensure safety.)
Citizens’ Rights: The detention of people at Guantanamo Bay serves as an actual example of potential contradictions between the aims of criminal justice professionals and civilians' 6th Amendment rights. There, detainees have endured long periods of confinement without charge, raising questions about their constitutional right to a prompt trial Criminal justice expert contend that these imprisonments, which frequently necessitate lengthy investigations, are required for national security and to prevent terrorist threats. Guantanamo
is somewhat telling, as this argument actually presupposes that detainees would be entitled to the
right
to jury trial if
Prompt
Student Response
Quinn were found not to apply
. (McDonald (2013). However, this prolonged incarceration can conflict with a person's entitlement to a prompt and impartial legal procedure. This disagreement draws attention to the ongoing discussion over how, in situations involving national security and terrorism, individual rights and communal safety should be balanced.
Professionals: Identify three to five examples of how the specific rights given to citizens in your chosen amendment
might potentially restrict the actions of professionals in the criminal justice system.
Professionals: Citizens who are accused of crimes are given special rights under the 6th Amendment, and these rights may limit what criminal justice professionals can do. Here are four illustrations: 1. Independent Jury Right: The accused person has a right to an impartial jury. Because of this, selecting fair jurors requires care and time on the part of the specialists. 2. Right to counsel: A person has the right to representation even if they are unable to pay for one. This implies that they must receive legal assistance from the court system's professionals. Because lawyers require time to get ready, it could slow down the procedure. 3. Speedy Trial Right: If someone is charged with a crime, they have the right to a speedy trial. This implies that the experts handling the case, such as the judges and prosecutors, cannot drag it out for too long.
4. Right to Interrogate Witnesses: A criminal suspect has the right to interrogate and cross-
examine witnesses who are testifying against them. This means that experts, such as prosecutors, must ensure that their witnesses are ready to respond to challenging inquiries.
References
Grossman, M., & Derks, S. (2014). Constitutional amendments : an encyclopedia of the people, procedures, politics, primary documents, campaigns for the 27 Amendments to the Constitution of the United States (First edition.). Grey House Pub. https://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?
direct=true&db=cat04477a&AN=snhu.b1149641&site=eds-live&scope=site
MCDONALD, T. (2013). A Few Good Angry Men: Application of the Jury Trial Clause of the Sixth Amendment to Non-
Citizens Detained at Guantanamo Bay.
American University Law Review
,
62
(3), 701–737. https://ezproxy.snhu.edu/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=i3h&AN=86687880&site=eds-
live&scope=site
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help