PHYSICS LAB DUE 30TH
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Western University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1202
Subject
Physics
Date
Apr 3, 2024
Type
Pages
17
Uploaded by BrigadierLobster1777
One-Dimensional Collisions - 7
Data and Work Sheets
- Print or bring it on an electronic device
One-Dimensional Collisions - Physics 1201A
2022-2023
Please circle the appropriate values
Course
1101A
1201A
1401A
1501A
Lab Section
002
003
004
005
006
007
008
009
010
013
014
Lab Subsection
A
B
C
D
Name
First:
Last:
Student #
Lab Partner
First:
Last:
Lab Station #
Date
Demonstrator
Disclaimer: Please note that some but not all questions in this lab writeup will be graded.
PART I:
INVESTIGATIONS OF ELASTIC AND INELASTIC COLLISIONS
EXPERIMENT 1: PRELIMINARY ADJUSTMENTS OF THE TRACK, CARTS AND
THE MOTION SENSORS
Figure 5:
Linear track with collision carts.
Linear Track
The experiments in this lab utilize a smooth linear metal track.
One-Dimensional Collisions - 8
Levelling the Track
Center a bubble level on the track at the 60 cm mark. Use the adjustable levelling feet on the linear
track (see Figure 5) to center the air bubble in the bubble level. Turn the bubble level 90 degrees
to level the track in the perpendicular direction to travel. When the track is level a cart centered at
the 60 cm mark should remain stationary.
Collision Carts
This lab uses two carts with low-friction ball bearing wheels that allow the carts to roll down the
track with minimal resistance caused by friction. One end of each cart is labeled ‘
elastic
’ and is
used when performing elastic collision experiments. Magnets are mounted underneath the ‘
elastic
’
ends of the carts in order to facilitate elastic collisions. The other end of the cart is not labeled but
can be identified from the mounted velcro tabs, which are used to facilitate
inelastic
collisions.
Each cart is labeled either A or B. Cart B contains a spring-loaded plunger held in place by a
‘plunger lock’. The plunger is used to facilitate the ‘explosion’ in Experiment 4.
Check that you
have one of each type of cart as in Figure 5
.
Figure 6:
Connecting Motion Sensor
A to port A on the
PowerLink
hub.
Motion Sensors
Each experiment requires a measurement of the velocity
of the carts before and after a collision.
For this pur-
pose you will use motion sensors mounted to the ends of
the linear track as in Figure 7. The motion sensors emit
pulses of ultrasound that reflect off ends of the carts and
return to the motion sensors where they are detected and
used to measure the position of the carts as a function of
time. The
position vs time
information is sent to the com-
puter where it is recorded and converted to
velocity vs
time
data. The motion sensors have a switch on top with
‘
person
’ or ‘
cart
’ selections.
Each motion sensor will
produce smoother data in either one or the other mode,
you should adjust your own sensors for best results.
The motion sensors are labeled A, B or C, as shown in
Figure 6. The ports on the
PowerLink
hub are also la-
beled A, B or C. Ensure that each motion sensor is connected to the correct port on the
PowerLink
hub.
The collision carts should be placed in each experiment such that they are closest to their matching
motion sensor at the beginning of the experiment. In each experiment the motion sensors will
begin collecting data when the velocity of one of the carts goes above v = 0.200 m/s. This helps to
ensure good quality data with less noise in each experiment. If you see a message indicating that
the initial conditions was not reached, try taking data again.
One-Dimensional Collisions - 9
Sign Convention
The velocity data produced by the motion sensors is given a sign based on whether the object under
investigation is moving in the positive or negative
x
direction as shown in Figure 7. Carts moving
to the right will be given a positive velocity while carts moving to the left will be given a negative
velocity.
Figure 7:
The experimental setup Experiment 1(a) showing the direction of motion that produces
a positive velocity.
Note:
Ensure that your experimental setup is the same as shown in Figure 7, i.e. Motion Sensor A
on the left side of the track, and Motion Sensor B on the right hand side of the track.
EXPERIMENT 1(a): MOTION SENSOR ALIGNMENT
APPARATUS
Linear track, two motion sensors, one collision cart, computer with
PASCO Cap-
stone
software.
The alignment procedure is described as below.
Use the bubble leveler to make sure that the truck is perfectly horizontal. Make use of the adjustable
legs if needed. Use the bubble leveler first along the track and subsequently perpendicular to the
track.
Position your eye, level with the track, at the 50 cm mark. Your cheek should be almost touching
the track with your eyes directed to motion sensor A. Adjust the tilt of the motion sensor so that
you can see your reflection in the motion sensors reflective face. Follow the same procedure for
motion sensor B.
This procedure is crucial to the rest of the experiment turning out well. Get help from your TA with
this part if you need it!
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
One-Dimensional Collisions - 10
EXPERIMENT 1(b): HOW TO TAKE MEASUREMENTS
Open ”1D Collisions.cap”. Different pages will be available in this file. You can toggle among the
pages by clicking on the heading names. The first page by default shows the experiment’s outline.
Click on the page video
”Instruction 1”
to learn how to use the
PASCO Capstone
graph interface
and how to take measurements from a graph. Click the on the video to have it started. You can
re-click on the video to pause the video as well. During the course of this video, the initial and
final velocities of Cart A, from the data on the graph will be measured. Record the values given in
the video below in Table 1.
Table 1:
Velocities measured in the instructional video
Data Run
Results
Run #1
Initial Velocity =
Final Velocity =
EXPERIMENT 1(c): ELASTIC COLLISIONS
Figure 8:
An elastic collision between two carts. Showing (a) before the collision: cart A has
initial velocity
v
iA
, and cart B is at rest,
v
iB
= 0; (b) after the collision: cart A has final velocity
v
fA
, and cart B has final velocity
v
fB
.
0
297
M/s
0
077
m/s
One-Dimensional Collisions - 11
OBSERVATION: ELASTIC COLLISION BETWEEN CARTS WITH EQUAL MASS
APPARATUS
Linear track, two motion sensors, two collision carts, computer with
PASCO Cap-
stone
software.
METHOD
(1)
Watch the collision videos in the page heading ”Collisions Video” - A Simple Experiment.
Click
I
to start a video.
(2) Make a prediction
as to which video best represents an elastic collision between two carts of
equal mass where one cart is initially at rest. Circle your prediction below.
Prediction:
(A)
(B)
(C)
Note: you will not lose marks if your prediction is wrong, but you will if you don’t make a predic-
tion!
(3)
With the track satisfactorily levelled, place both collision carts on the track so that the sides of
the carts labelled ‘
elastic
’ are facing each other. With one cart stationary, give the other cart a
gentle push so that it rolls towards the other at constant velocity. Watch how the velocities of
each cart change after they collide.
Was your prediction correct?
(Yes)
(No)
(4)
Now, roll one cart slowly, and the other at least twice as fast, towards each other so that they
collide. Observe again how the velocities of the carts change after they collide.
Question:
Carts of equal mass collide in an elastic collision, where cart A has an initial mo-
mentum
p
A
and cart B has an initial momentum
p
B
. What would you expect the final momenta
of cart A and cart B to be?
Cart
A
will
have
a
final
momentum
that
is
equal
to
the
initial
momentum
of
cart
B
because
[Pf
=
EPi
.
This
means
that
PfB
=
PiA
-
One-Dimensional Collisions - 12
EXPERIMENT 2: INVESTIGATION OF AN ELASTIC COLLISION USING PASCO
CAPSTONE SOFTWARE
APPARATUS
Linear track, two motion sensors, two collision carts, metal bar, electric balance,
computer with
PASCO Capstone
software.
INTRODUCTION
To study the law of conservation of momentum for an elastic collision, you will perform a series
of experiments to investigate how the initial velocity and mass of each cart involved in a collision
affects the final velocities of the carts after a collision, thus we will study
METHOD
Click on the
”Elastic Collision Page”
. Measure the mass of each cart and the metal bar using the
electronic balance and record your results in the section Data before Table 2. The mass of the carts
are very similar and you will place the metal bar on cart A to increase its mass. In this experiment,
PASCO Capstone
will provide graphs of the
total momentum vs time
and
total kinetic energy vs
time
. In order for
PASCO Capstone
to provide these graphs, you must register the mass of each
cart in
PASCO Capstone
.
To register the masses of the carts in
PASCO Capstone
, click the Calculator button
on the
PASCO Capstone
left side of the screen under Tools. A window will pop up. Select and double-
click
M
1
from the list. Enter your measured value for the total mass of cart A (cart + metal bar) in
kg. This will be the mass of cart A in the experiment. Select and double-click
M
2
. Enter the mass
of cart B and then click the accept button
.
Be sure not to click the delete button
by mistake
.
Center Cart B at around the 70 cm mark on the linear track with it’s ‘elastic’ end facing motion
sensor A. With cart B stationary, hit the
PASCO Capstone
record button
and give cart A a push
towards cart B to begin collecting data (as in Figure 8). The computer screen will display the
veloc-
ity vs time
,
total momentum vs time
and
total kinetic energy vs time
graphs for both cars. Measure
the initial velocity
v
iA
of cart A, the final velocities
v
fA
and
v
fB
of carts A and B respectively. Also
measure the total initial momentum
p
i
, total final momentum
p
f
, total initial kinetic energy
K
i
and
total final kinetic energy
K
f
for carts A and B. Record the measured values in Table 2. Repeat the
experiment two more times. To delete previously taken plots, go to ‘Experiment’ menu. Note, in
PASCO Capstone
, if the entire plot area (3 plots) is not fully visible within the screen area, click
on the graph and press the scale axes button
to rescale your screen resolution.
DATA
Mass of cart A
Mass of the metal bar
Total mass of cart A = mass of cart A + metal bar
Mass of cart B
498
29
498
29
996
49
498
39
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
One-Dimensional Collisions - 13
Table 2:
Experiment 2: Elastic collision measurements for two carts with different masses
Trial
v
iA
(m/s)
v
iB
(m/s)
p
i
(kg m/s)
K
i
(J)
v
fA
(m/s)
v
fB
(m/s)
p
f
(kg m/s)
K
f
(J)
% Diff
p
i
&
p
f
% Diff
K
i
&
K
f
1
2
3
Do not delete your last data run for this activity. You will need these graphs to answer a post-lab
question at the end of this manual.
The last two columns in Table 2 show the percentage difference between the initial and final values
of momenta and kinetic energy.
CALCULATIONS
Sample Calculation: linear momentum before and after the elastic collision
Select one of the trials from Table 2 and provide a sample calculation for the initial and final
momenta values (
p
iA
,
p
fA
and
p
fB
) of the collision carts. Record the trial number. Use SI units.
Trial #:
p
iA
p
fA
p
fB
Total initial momentum of the two carts
p
i
Total final momentum of the two carts
p
f
M
=
0
9964
E
=
Emu
MB
=
0
4983
p
:
MVA
+
MVB
0
4656
0
0
0
4639
0
1080
0
2038
0
4780
0
4413
0
0776
5
0
%
32
7
%
0
3364
0
0
0
.
3352
0
0564
0
1239
0
3813
0
3135
0
0439
6
7
%
25
0
%
0
3262
0
0
0
3250
0
0530
0
2679
0
5691
0
5505
0
1164
51
5
%
74
9
%
2
=
MAVix
=
(0
9965)(0
3364)
=
0
3352226
kym/s
=
MAVfA
30
9965)
(0
1239)
=
0
12346635
kgm/
=
MB VfB
=
10
4983)(0
3813)
=
0
28358253
kgm/s
=
MAViA
+
MBViB
=
(0
9965kq)(0
3364
m/s)
=
0
3352726
kgm/s
=
MAUfA
+
MBVfB
=
10
9965kg)(0
1239
m/s)
+
10
4983ky)(0
3813
m/s)
=
0
31346814
kym/
One-Dimensional Collisions - 14
For the trial you have selected, compare the initial and final total momentum of the carts using the
percent difference test.
% difference test
=
p
f
-
p
i
(
p
i
+
p
f
)
/
2
⇥
100
<
10%
What is your conclusion about the total linear momentum of the two carts?
Sample Calculation: kinetic energy before and after the elastic collision
Provide a sample calculation for the initial kinetic energy
K
iA
and the final kinetic energies
K
fA
and
K
fB
of the collision carts. Use the data from the same trial used in the previous sample calculation.
K
iA
K
fA
K
fB
Total initial kinetic energy of the two carts
K
i
Total final kinetic energy of the of the two carts,
K
f
For the trial you have selected, compare the initial and final total kinetic energies of the carts.
% difference between
K
i
and
K
f
=
K
f
-
K
i
(
K
i
+
K
f
)
/
2
⇥
100
<
10%
What can you conclude about the total kinetic energy of the two carts?
0
44/25372
0
46392384
x
100
0
46392384
+
0
44125372
=
5
0
%
The
total
linear
momentum
of
cart
A
and
cart
B
should
have
been
conserved
because
this
collision
was
supposed
to
be
elactic
,
but
perfectly
elastic
collisions
are
nearly
impossible
doe
to
experimental
and
human
errow
this
could
be
because
of
the
energy
turning
into
heat
dre
to
friction
.
=
t m
+
Vix
=
510
9964)(0
3364)"
=
0
0563787835
=
jMAVfA
=
t(0
9964)(0
1239)
2
=
0
0076479725
=
EMBV
+
B
=
+(0
4983)(0
3813)
=
0
036223841
j
=
0
056378783
J
=
KfA
+
KfB
=
0
007647972
+
0
036223841
0
043871813
J
0
10800
147
0
077619246
%
difference
between
Ki
and
Kf
=
1
kf
-
Ki
x100
=
10
043871814
0
05637876
X 100
=
24
95
%
10
043871814
+
0
056378783)/2
The
percent
difference
of
initial
Kinetic
energy
and
Final
Kinetic
energy
was
much
above
10
%
which
could
have
been
due
to
human
error
,
instrument
reading
error
,
or
experimental
error
.
Since
this
collision
was
elastic
,
the
Kinetic
energy
should
have
been
conserved
from
initial
to
final
One-Dimensional Collisions - 15
EXPERIMENT 3: INVESTIGATION OF AN INELASTIC COLLISION
Figure 9:
An inelastic collision between carts A and B. (a) Before the collision, cart B is at rest.
(b) After the collision the two carts stick together, travelling with a velocity
v
fAB
.
APPARATUS
Linear track, two motion sensors, two collision carts with velcro pads, computer
with
PASCO Capstone
software, electric balance.
INTRODUCTION
In this experiment, you will study the linear momentum and kinetic energy of two carts undergoing
complete inelastic collisions.
In an inelastic collision, the total linear momentum is conserved
while the total kinetic energy is not conserved.
Uncertainties
Estimate the
absolute uncertainties
in your measurements from the standard deviation (std. dev.)
in your measurements. In each measurement, your standard deviation should have a magnitude no
greater than 0.003. Get help from your TA if it is more than this.
METHOD
Click on the ”Inelastic Collisions” Page.
Using the Calculator button
on the
PASCO Capstone
menu, change the mass of Cart A back
to the mass of the cart without the mass bar on top. After entering the mass, be sure to click the
‘accept’ button. Place cart B at rest, centered at the 70 cm mark on the track. Arrange cart B so
that it’s ‘inelastic’ end is facing motion sensor A. Place cart A near the motion sensor A with it’s
‘inelastic’ end facing cart B as in Figure 9(a). Press the
PASCO Capstone
record button and then
push cart A towards cart B so that the carts stick together when they collide as in Figure 9(b). From
PASCO Capstone
plots, measure the velocity of the carts just before and just after the collision.
Record your results in Table 3.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
One-Dimensional Collisions - 16
PASCO Capstone
will use the velocity data and the mass measurements entered as experimental
constants to produce graphs of
total momentum vs time
and
total kinetic energy vs time
. From these
plots displayed on the computer, measure the total momentum just before the collision
p
i
and just
after the collision
p
f
, as well as the total kinetic energy just before the collision
K
i
and just after
the collision
K
f
. Take three data runs, and record your results in Table 3.
DATA
Table 3: Inelastic collision measurements for two carts.
Mass of cart A,
m
A
,
Mass of cart B,
m
B
Trial
v
iA
(m/s)
v
iB
(m/s)
p
i
(kg m/s)
K
i
(J)
v
fAB
(m/s)
p
f
(kg m/s)
K
f
(J)
% Diff
p
i
&
p
f
% Diff
K
i
&
K
f
(
K
i
-
K
f
)/
K
i
1
2
3
CALCULATIONS
Linear momentum before and after an inelastic collision:
What can you conclude about the total linear momentum of the two carts?
Kinetic energy before and after an inelastic collision:
What can you conclude about the total kinetic energy of the two carts?
498
29
=
0
4982kg
0
4983
kg
0
5328
0
0
0
2654
0
1327
0
.
3328
0
3316
0
0
552
22
2
%
24
7
%
0
2195
0
4780
0
0
0
2381
0
0569
0
3020
0
3009
0
0454
23
3
%
22
5
%
0
2021
0
6697
0
0
0
.
3336
0
1117
0
3073
0
3062
0
047
8
57
%
8
1
4
%
0
5783
Linear
momentum
in
trial
3
was
best
conserved
out
of
all
the
trials
We
know
this
because
the
%
difference
of
final
momentum
&
initial
momentum
was
close
to
10
%
In
trial
3
the
%
difference
of
Kinetic
energy
is
81
4
%
which
is
greater
than
10
%.
In
this
case
the
total
Kinetic
energy
was
not
conserved
One-Dimensional Collisions - 17
Fractional kinetic energy lost
(
K
i
-
K
f
)
/
K
i
The last column of Table 3 gives the fraction of kinetic energy lost compared to the initial kinetic
energy. What happens to the lost energy in this situation?
Table 3 shows three inelastic collisions with varying velocities and kinetic energies but for the
same cars with constant mass. What can you say about the fraction
(
K
i
-
K
f
)
/
K
i
for the three
collisions?
PART II:
INVESTIGATIONS OF EXPLOSIONS AND IMPULSE
IN ONE-DIMENSIONAL COLLISIONS
In Experiment 4, you will study the conservation of momentum in an explosion when there are no
external forces acting on the system. In Experiment 5, you will take data to verify that the impulse
J
or the change in momentum during a collision is given by
J
=
p
f
-
p
i
.
EXPERIMENT 4: CONSERVATION OF LINEAR MOMENTUM IN
ONE-DIMENSIONAL EXPLOSIONS
Figure 10:
One-Dimensional Explosion. (a) Before explosion, carts A and B are together at rest.
(b) After explosion, carts A and B move in opposite directions.
APPARATUS
Linear track, two motion sensors, two collision carts, metal bar, computer running
PASCO Capstone
.
The
energy
might
have
been
lost
through
friction
force
(increased
because
of
their
combined
masses
turning
into
heat
or
the
sound
energy
coming
from
the
vibrations
everytime
the
two
carts
brmp
into
each
other
According
to
the
fraction
(Ki-F)
,
Kinetic
energy
lost
for
the
inelastic
collision
in
this
experiment
t
will
be
the
same
,
although
differing
in
Ke
and
Velocity
.
One-Dimensional Collisions - 18
INTRODUCTION
In this experiment, you will study the momentum of each cart involved in an explosion.
Uncertainties
Estimate the
absolute uncertainties
in your measurements from the standard deviation (std. dev.)
in your measurements. In each measurement, your standard deviation should have a magnitude no
greater than 0.003 in the units of the quantity of interest. Get help from your TA if it is more than
this.
METHOD
Click on the ”1D Explosion” Page. One of the collision carts that you are using will have a small
tab sticking out the top of it. Pressing the tab down will release a spring-loaded plunger from
the end of the cart. The plunger will be used in this experiment as the internal impulse for the
explosion. Load the plunger by pushing it in and slightly upwards until it catches. Don’t force it!
It should load easily and smoothly. Place carts A and B together in the middle of the linear track
such that the ‘
inelastic
’ ends of the carts are touching. Hit the
PASCO Capstone
record button
,
to begin collecting data. Set off the explosion by tapping the tab on top of the cart with the spring
loaded plunger (tapping the tab lightly with the metal bar works well).
Measure the final velocities,
v
fA
and
v
fB
, of carts A and B, respectively, using the
PASCO Capstone
statistics tool as previously described.
Record the standard deviation as the uncertainty in the
measurement. Record your data in Table 4. Perform the experiment a total of three times.
DATA AND CALCULATIONS
Table 4: Data for one-dimensional explosion.
Mass of cart A
,
Mass of cart B
Trial
v
fA
(m/s)
v
fB
(m/s)
p
fA
(N s)
p
fB
(N s)
p
f
(N s)
% Difference
p
fA
&
p
fB
1
2
What can you conclude from the results in Table 4?
0
.
4982
0
4983
K
ky
9
0
4108
0
3925
0
2043
0
1956
0
00862
4
31
%
in
the
C-)
direction
0
334/
0
2906
0
1664
0
1448-0
02165
13
9
%
in
the
1-)
direction
Since
%
difference
is
very
close
or
<
10
%
Momentum
is
conserved
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
One-Dimensional Collisions - 19
EXPERIMENT 5: CHANGE OF MOMENTUM AND IMPULSE IN ELASTIC
COLLISIONS AND IMPULSE
Figure 11:
Setup for measuring the impulse and change of momentum in Experiment 5.
APPARATUS
Linear track, motion sensor, collision cart, force sensor with magnetic bumper,
computer running
PASCO Capstone
, pan balance.
Figure 12:
Inserting the linear track onto the
force sensor bracket.
INTRODUCTION
In Experiment 5 the change of momentum that
an cart undergoes during an elastic collision is
measured.
The forces that occur during the
collision are measured as a function of time
and related to the change in momentum experi-
enced by the collision cart.
METHOD
The video ”Instruction 2” explains how to mea-
sure the area under the force vs time curve. Use
cart A for this experiment.
Remove motion
sensor B from the linear track.
Mount the linear track onto the bracket holding the force sen-
sor and magnetic bumper on the right side of the table. The two pins on the bracket slide into slots
on the end of the linear track to secure it in place as shown in Figure 12 (note: do not undo the
clamp holding the force sensor and bracket to the table). If setup properly, the apparatus should
look like that in Figure 11.
Click on ”Change of Momentum and Impulse” Page.
Important:
Press the ‘zero’ button on the top of the force sensor before each data run.
Important:
PASCO Capstone will use the mass of cart A in it’s calculations. Ensure that you use
collision cart A for this experiment.
Position the collision cart so it is centered on the 20 cm mark on the track with the elastic end of
the cart facing the force sensor. Click the
PASCO Capstone
record button,
, to begin collecting
data then push the cart so that it rolls towards the force sensor and magnetic bumper. Push the
PASCO Capstone
record button again to stop the recording, after the cart bounces back from the
magnetic bumper.
One-Dimensional Collisions - 20
You should now have a smooth graph of
velocity vs time
,
momentum vs time
and
force vs time
. If
the cart was pushed too hard, the graph of
force vs time
will have a sharp spike at the centre. In
this case, erase the last data run and repeat.
Determine the initial velocity
v
i
and momentum
p
i
and the final velocity
v
f
and momentum
p
f
from the
PASCO Capstone
graphs. Enter the results in Table 5.
The area under the
force vs time
graph is equal to the total impulse
J
.
PASCO Capstone
measures
the area under the entire
force vs time
curve and lists it in the graph legend. The default selection
for the area under the curve will include the whole curve which includes ‘noise’ that the force
sensor picks up when there is no force applied to the sensor. To get a more accurate value for the
area under the
force vs time
curve, click and drag a square over the area that corresponds to the
duration over which the collision occurs. Enter the results in Table 5.
DATA AND CALCULATIONS
Table 5: Velocities of the Collision Cart and Impulse.
Mass of cart A,
m
A
Trial
Initial
Velocity
Final
Velocity
Initial
Momentum
Final
Momentum
Change in
Momentum
Impulse
J
(kg m/s)
%
Difference
v
i
(m/s)
v
f
(m/s)
p
i
(kg m/s)
p
f
(kg m/s)
D
p
(kg m/s)
(Area under
F vs t
graph)
between
|
D
p
|
and
|
J
|
1
2
What conclusion can you draw from the results in the last column?
0
4982
0
6680
0
53380
3327976
0
4614
6
4
%
0
265939/6
0
59873676
0
4737
0
40580
23599734
0
.
4788
0
20216956
0
4381669
2
.
15
%
%
difference
between
Up
and
impolse
is
<
10
%.
This
proves
that
80
=
Impulse
.
One-Dimensional Collisions - 21
Post-Lab Questions
(1) The human body is injured not by high speeds but by high forces associated with high accel-
erations. Using the data already collected in Experiment 2, compute the acceleration felt by
both carts during the elastic collision. Compare the accelerations of the more massive cart to
the less massive cart. Which cart had the higher acceleration? Extrapolating up in size, would
you expect a passenger to be safer in a car collision in a heavier car or a lighter one?
(2) The momentum of a car crashing into a wall will change very quickly as the car decelerates
rapidly to a speed of zero. Using the equation for change in momentum,
D
p
=
F
·
d
t
, explain
how can an air bag effectively protect a passenger during a car crash?
more
massive
cart
less
massive
curt
M1
=
0
9964
m
=
0
4983
T
=
m
,
a
F
=
m
,
a
of
ro
em
a
En
=
on
e
in
-
da
=
Em
as
mass
increases
acceleration
decreases
assuming
they
have
been
acted
upon
by
the
same
force
.
the
less
massive
cart
had
higher
acceleration
.
I
world
expect
a
passanger
p
=
mu
to
be
safer
in
a
lighter
↓
P
=
V
=
FOt
↑
mass
,
A
impulse
·
less
safe
in
a
car
accident
car
in
a
car
collision
.
↓
mass
,
d
imprise
↓
p
=
F
dt
an
airbag
increases
the
time
of
the
collision
therefore
decessing
the
impulse
acted
onto
the
cur
and
passanger
.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
One-Dimensional Collisions - 22
CONCLUSIONS AND DISCUSSION
(In this section, summarize the conclusions from Experiments 2 to 5. What physics concepts did
you study? Did you get the expected results? If not, why? What are the sources of errors in this
lab?)
In
experiment
I
we
liked
the
law
of
conservation
of
mentru
for
an
elastic
collision
.
We
did
not
get
the
expected
results
by
ring
the
difference
in
%
of
It
and
i
.
We
got
a
%
higher
than
10
%
and
un
thank
it
is
because
of
hum
or
experimental
error
.
Expervant
I
was
all
about
Kinetic
energy
and
how
in
an
inelastic
collision
,
linear
momentum
is
conserved
while
EK
is
not
Not
expected
results
but
enemy
could
been
lost
through
heat
or
sound
exemp
:
Experiment
4
was
about
8p
=
I
.
In
they
experiment
our
momentine
was
conserved
become
our
%
o
difference
value
was
less
than
10
%.
Concluding
that
Empolic
=
Pf-pi
Experiment
5
was
about
change
in
momentum
like
expriment
4
but
there
was
an
elastic
collision
measured
.
Our
%
difference
betwe
J
(impulse)
and
Op
(momentum)
was
less
than
10
%.
meaning
o
Impulse
The
sources
of
error
in
the
labres
the
change
in
energy
whether
that
be
from
Kinde
energy
to
heat
,
or
fireho
or
vibrations
through
sound
Some
somes
of
possible
errors
could
have
been
human
or
readmy
erron
,
or
just
errors
like
the
cart
want
mrkry
.
One-Dimensional Collisions - 23
Final Mark
Related Documents
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based Text
Physics
ISBN:9781133104261
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:9781337553278
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern ...
Physics
ISBN:9781337553292
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...
Physics
ISBN:9781133939146
Author:Katz, Debora M.
Publisher:Cengage Learning
College Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781938168000
Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger Hinrichs
Publisher:OpenStax College
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningPhysics for Scientists and EngineersPhysicsISBN:9781337553278Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningPhysics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern ...PhysicsISBN:9781337553292Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...PhysicsISBN:9781133939146Author:Katz, Debora M.Publisher:Cengage LearningCollege PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781938168000Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger HinrichsPublisher:OpenStax College
Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based Text
Physics
ISBN:9781133104261
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:9781337553278
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Physics for Scientists and Engineers with Modern ...
Physics
ISBN:9781337553292
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...
Physics
ISBN:9781133939146
Author:Katz, Debora M.
Publisher:Cengage Learning
College Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781938168000
Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger Hinrichs
Publisher:OpenStax College