Physics Lab 7_ Rotation
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Purdue University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
152J
Subject
Physics
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
Pages
14
Uploaded by MateSquid3863
Lab 7: Rotation
Lab Date:4/8/2023
Lab Section #: _005____________
Purdue University Northwest – PHYS 15200 – Spring
2023
Abstract:
In this lab, we aimed to determine how things such as inertia, torque, and angular
acceleration are understood using a rotational inertia demonstrator. The rotating object comprises
four pulleys of different radius, and four thin rods extending radially from the pulley. A
"moveable mass" can be attached to each of the rods using a set-screw. As we noticed from the
labs, as the masses are concentrated away from the rotational axis or center, the mass begins to
carry more of the momentum, we saw that as angular acceleration decreases, inertia increases.
Also when the mass is closer to the center, momentum is conserved and the object spins faster
vs. as farther away the object spins slower. Although outside of this lab, moment of inertia does
also determine the amount of kinetic energy that an object possesses from its rotational motion.
The larger the momentum of inertia, the more energy is required to make the object spin faster or
slower. Understanding the momentum of inertia is crucial in calculating the energy requirements
and efficiency of various mechanical systems that involve rotational motion. In conclusion, by
manipulating the demonstrator and observing its motion along with the various concepts it
presents, we can develop a deeper understanding of these concepts and relate these to real-world
scenarios.
Introduction:
The primary objectives of this lab experiment are:
1.
To determine the moment of inertia of the spinning object
2.
To modify the moment of inertia of the spinning object and moveable mass system and
observe any changes in behavior
3.
To compare the measured moment of inertia to a theoretical calculation
4.
To adjust the torque on the spinning object and observe any changes in behavior.
In this lab experiment, we will be using the Rotational Inertia Demonstrator to enhance
our understanding of concepts such as moment of inertia, torque, and angular acceleration. The
device consists of a rotating object that is affixed to a hub with low friction. The rotating object
comprises four pulleys of different radius, and four thin rods extending radially from the pulley.
A "moveable mass" can be attached to each of the rods using a set-screw. When we hang a
"hanging mass" from a string wrapped around the pulley, the hanging mass produces tension in
the string, which generates a torque on the system, resulting in the entire apparatus rotating. The
torque can be adjusted by altering the suspended mass or the pulley that the string is wrapped
around. Additionally, the moment of inertia of the system can be adjusted by moving the
moveable masses.
To measure the system's behavior, we will observe the time it takes for a falling mass to
descend a fixed distance. We can use these time measurements and the constant acceleration
equations to compute the acceleration of the falling mass. We will then relate this acceleration to
the angular acceleration and moment of inertia of the system.
Experimental Procedure:
To begin the experiment, the mass of the moveable mass and the hanging mass were
taken using a scale, which measured the mass of the objects with a precision of 0.0g. Then, the
diameter and radius of the two smallest pulleys were measured using a vernier caliper, which
measured these values with a precision of 0.000cm. Next, all of the moveable masses were
removed from the spinning apparatus so that the moment of inertia of the pulley and rods could
be measured. A string was then tied around the smallest pulley and extended down just above the
ground. The hanging mass, while not touching the ground, was tied to the end of the string. The
distance between the bottom of the hanging mass and the bottom of the table was then taken
using a tape measure with a precision of 0.0cm and recorded as the vertical displacement. The
apparatus was then turned so the string would wind around the pulley until the bottom of the
mass was even with the bottom of the table. Then, the apparatus was released so that the mass
could fall and cause the apparatus to spin. The time that it took for the mass to reach the bottom
was recorded by using a stopwatch with a precision of 0.00s.
After conducting the test run, this same procedure was used and ten different trials were
recorded. For these ten trials, the same setup as the test was used and the time it took for the
weight to reach the bottom was recorded using a stopwatch. For the second experiment, one
moveable mass is attached to each of the four rods as close to the center as possible. The distance
between the center of the hub and the center of the moveable mass was then measured with a
tape measure. Then, the same procedure in experiment one was repeated for five trials. The
average of these times were then taken. After the five trials, the moveable masses were moved
outward 5cm from the current position and the distance from the center of the hub and the
moveable mass was measured again. Once again, the experimental procedure was repeated for
five trails and the time that it took for the hanging mass to reach the bottom was recorded. The
moveable masses were moved outward 5cm three more times and the same procedures were
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
followed each time. For the third experiment, the moveable masses were moved to the ends of
each rod, and the distance between the rotation axis and the moveable mass was measured. Then,
five trials were conducted using the smallest pulley and the times were recorded. Next, the string
was wrapped around the second smallest pulley and five trials were conducted again. Data was
recorded and compiled after each experiment. Various calculations were also done and are shown
in the results and analysis section.
Data:
Setup:
Measurement
Symbol
Value and measured
unit
Converted Value and SI
unit
Mass of one moveable mass
Mm
185.6g
0.1856kg
Mass of hanging mass
Mh
200.2g
0.2002kg
Diameter of smallest pulley
D1
3.978cm
0.03978m
Radius of smallest pulley
R1
1.989cm
0.01989m
Diameter of 2nd smallest
pulley
D2
5.556cm
0.05556m
Radius of 2nd smallest
pulley
R2
2.778cm
0.02778m
The weight values are recorded using a scale with a precision of 0.0g, and the length
measurements are measured using a vernier caliper with a precision of 0.000cm. The conversion
calculations are shown in the results and analysis section.
Experiment One:
Vertical Displacement of hanging mass = 83.8cm = 0.838m
This is the distance between the bottom of the hanging mass and the bottom of the table,
measured using a tape measure with a precision of 0.0cm. The conversion is shown in the results
and analysis section.
Trial
Time (s)
1
4.65
2
5.31
3
5.15
4
5.12
5
5.22
6
5.40
7
5.19
8
5.01
9
5.18
10
5.15
These are the time values recorded on the stopwatch for each trial in experiment one.
Experiment Two:
Distance between axis of rotation and center of moveable mass = 11.9cm = 0.119m
This is the distance between the axis of rotation and the center of the moveable mass, measured
using a tape measure with a precision of 0.0cm. The conversion is shown in the results and
analysis section.
First circle pulley with weights
No. of Trial
Time (s) #1
Time (s) #2
Time (s) #3
Time (s)
#4
Time (s) #5
1.
6.88
8.25
9.59
11.88
13.40
2.
7.01
8.27
9.72
11.31
13.50
3.
6.72
8.22
9.70
11.63
13.45
4.
6.75
8.19
9.65
11.44
13.40
5.
6.93
8.20
9.67
11.53
13.41
This table shows the recorded times for the five trials for each of the five configurations of the
moveable masses on the rods.
Experiment Three:
Distance between moveable masses at the ends of the rods and the rotation axis = 32.4cm =
0.324m
This is the distance between the axis of rotation and the center of the moveable mass at the end
of the rods, measured using a tape measure with a precision of 0.0cm. The conversion is shown
in the results and analysis section.
No. of Trial
Time (s) Second Pulley
Time (s) First Pulley
1.
9.87
13.90
2.
9.90
13.65
3.
9.40
13.47
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4.
9.86
13.56
5.
9.65
13.59
This table shows the times recorded for the five trials done on the two different pulleys.
Results and Analysis:
Conversions:
Example Mass Conversion for Mm = 185.6g * (1kg / 1000g) = 0.1856kg
Example length or distance conversion for D1 = 3.978cm * (1m / 100cm) = 0.03978m
Experiment One:
Trial
Time (s)
1
4.65
2
5.31
3
5.15
4
5.12
5
5.22
6
5.40
7
5.19
8
5.01
9
5.18
10
5.15
Mean
5.14
St. Dev
0.201
St. Dev of Mean
0.0636
This table shows the values for the mean, standard deviation, and standard deviation of the mean
for the first experiment. Calculations are shown below.
Calculations:
Mean = (4.65 + 5.31 + 5.15 + 5.12 + 5.22 + 5.40 + 5.19 + 5.01 + 5.18 + 5.15) / 10 =
5.14
St. Dev = (1/9 * (4.65 - 5.14)^2 + (5.31 - 5.14)^2 + (5.15 - 5.14)^2 + (5.12 - 5.14)^2 + (5.22 -
5.14)^2 + (5.40 - 5.14)^2 + (5.19 - 5.14)^2 + (5.01 - 5.14)^2 + (5.18 - 5.14)^2 + (5.15 -
5.14)^2))^(½) =
0.201
St. Dev of Mean = 0.201 / (10)^(½) =
0.0636
Calculation of acceleration of hanging mass:
To find the acceleration in this experiment, one of the constant acceleration equations can be
used. Here is the equation:
X = Xo + Vo * t + ½ * a * t^2
In this equation, X is the final position, Xo is the initial position, Vo is the initial velocity, a is the
acceleration, and t is the time. X - Xo will be the displacement we measured and time will be the
mean time from the ten trials.
a = (2 * (X - Xo - Vo * t)) / t^2
a = (2 * (0.838m)) / (5.14s)^2 =
0.0634m/s^2
Calculation of uncertainty in acceleration:
Ua = a * ((Ux / x)^2 + (Ut / t)^2)^(½)
In this equation, Ua represents the uncertainty of acceleration, Ux represents the uncertainty of
the displacement, Ut represents the uncertainty of time, t represents time, a represents
acceleration, and x represents displacement. Ux is assumed to be 0.5cm and Ut is assumed to be
the standard deviation of the mean of the time previously calculated from the ten trials.
Ua = 0.0634m/s^2 * ((0.005m / 0.838m)^2 + (0.0636 / 5.14)^2)^(½) =
8.71e-4
Calculate angular acceleration of the spinning object:
For this calculation, this equation can be used:
a = R * ang
In this equation, R is the radius of the smallest pulley, a is the acceleration, and ang is the angular
acceleration.
ang = a / R1
ang = 0.0634m/s^2 / 0.01989m =
3.19rad/s^2
Calculate tension:
This equation was derived from a free body force diagram that showed tension and weight acting
on the hanging mass in opposite directions. This is the equation from the diagram:
NetF = Mh * a
Wh - T = Mh * a
T = Mh * (g - a)
In this equation, NetF was replaced with Wh, the force of gravity acting on the hanging mass,
and T, the force of tension. T is the tension force, Mh is the mass of the hanging mass, g is the
acceleration due to gravity, and a is acceleration.
T = 0.2002kg * (9.81m/s^2 - 0.0634m/s^2) =
1.95 N
Calculate the moment of inertia:
The equation for this value is derived from an extended free body diagram for the spinning
apparatus. In this diagram the force of tension acting on the pulley acts some distance, R, away
from the axis of rotation in a direction tangential to the pulley. This will produce torque. The
force of gravity will act on the center of mass of the system, and the force of the support hub will
act as a normal force and ensure that the net force on the system is zero. So, from the body
diagram, this equation is derived:
Nettor = I * ang
T tor = I * ang
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
R * T = I * ang
I = (R * T) / ang
In this equation, the net torque is coming from the tension on the pulley. So, Nettor, or net
torque, is just T tor, or the torque from the pulley. Since the torque due to tension force is equal
to the radius of the pulley times the tension force, T tor can be replaced with R * T. As a result, I,
the moment of inertia, can be solved for.
I = (R * T) / ang
I = (0.01989m * 1.95N) / 3.19rad/s^2 =
0.01216kg m^2
Experiment Two:
Distance between
axis of rotation and
movable mass (m)
Avg
measured
time (s)
Calculated
acceleration
(m/s^2)
Calculated
angular
acceleration
(rad/s^2)
Calculated
tension in
rope (N)
Calculated
torque
(Nm)
Measured
moment
of Inertia
(kg m^2)
0.119
6.89
0.0353
1.78
1.96
0.0389
0.0219
0.169
8.23
0.0247
1.24
1.96
0.0390
0.0313
0.219
9.67
0.0179
0.901
1.96
0.0390
0.0433
0.269
11.56
0.0125
0.631
1.96
0.0390
0.0619
0.319
13.43
0.00929
0.467
1.96
0.0390
0.0835
The average time, calculated acceleration, calculated angular acceleration, calculated tension,
and measured moment of inertia are all calculated the same way as in experiment one shown
above.
Calculating torque:
The torque is calculated using this equation:
Tor = R * F
In this equation, Tor is the torque, R is the radius of the smallest pulley, and F is the tension in
the rope T.
Tor = R * F
Tor = 0.01989m * 1.96N =
0.0389Nm
Calculate the theoretical moment of inertia of the entire spinning system:
Distance between axis of rotation and
movable mass (m)
Measured moment of
inertia (kg m^2)
Theoretical moment of
inertia (kg m^2)
0.119
0.0219
0.0227
0.169
0.0313
0.0334
0.219
0.0433
0.0478
0.269
0.0619
0.0659
0.319
0.0835
0.0877
The equation used to calculate the theoretical moment of inertia is as follows:
I theory = I pulley+rod + 4 * Mm * r^2
In this equation, I pulley+rod is the moment of inertia calculated in experiment one, Mm is the
mass of the moveable mass, and r is the distance between the axis of rotation and the moveable
mass.
I theory = I pulley+rod + 4 * Mm * r^2
I theory = 0.01216kg m^2 + 4 * 0.1856kg * (0.119)^2
I theory =
0.0227kg m^2
Experiment three:
Pulley
radius
(m)
Average
Measured
Time (s)
Calculated
Acceleration
(m/s^2)
Calculated
Angular
accelerated
rad/s^2)
Calculated
Tension in
rope (N)
Calculated
Torque
(Nm)
0.01989
13.63
0.009022
0.4536
1.96
0.0390
0.02778
9.74
0.017667
0.6360
1.96
0.0545
The values in the chart above are calculated in the same way as in the two previous experiments.
Calculate theoretical moment of inertia for experiment three:
The theoretical moment of inertia is calculated with the same equation as in the previous set up:
I theory = I pulley+rod + 4 * Mm * r^2
I theory = 0.01216kg m^2 + 4 * 0.1856kg * (0.324m)^2 =
0.0511 kg m^2
Conclusion:
A) In Experiment 2, as you moved the masses outward along the rod, what trend did you
observe in your time measurements? Did the average time increase, decrease, or stay the
same? Explain why this happened using physics concepts.
In experiment 2, as the masses were moved outward, the average time recorded
increased, meaning that it took longer for the hanging mass to reach the bottom. This occurs
because, as mass is concentrated away from the rotational axis or center, the mass begins to carry
more of the momentum and it becomes harder to change the velocity of the system. When the
mass is closer to the center, momentum is conserved and the object spins faster.
B) In Experiment 2, as you moved the masses outward along the rod, what trend did you
observe in your angular acceleration measurements? Did the angular acceleration increase,
decrease, or stay the same? Explain why this happened using physics concepts.
Moving the masses so they are farther from the axis of rotation, will increase the R in the
rotational inertia equation and therefore increase the rotational inertia of the system. Assuming
you leave the mass hanging the same, the torque should be about the same. Then the rotational
form of Newton's second law shows that when you increase the rotational inertia, the angular
acceleration must decrease. The reason for this is related to the answer provided in the previous
question. As mass is moved further from the center of rotation, there is more area that the mass
of the system has to travel using the same momentum, causing the speed to decrease. So, moving
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
the masses outward increases the moment of inertia. As a result, the object spins slower, which
causes the angular acceleration to decrease.
C) In Experiment 2, as you moved the masses outward along the rod, what trend did you
observe in your moment of inertia measurements? Did the moment of inertia increase,
decrease, or stay the same? Explain why this happened using physics concepts.
Moving the masses outward along the rod increases the rotational inertia of the system,
which decreases the angular acceleration of the system. So, the moment of inertia increases as
the masses are moved outward. Again, this is because there is more area that the mass of the
system has to cover using the same momentum, which causes the system to decrease in speed.
D) In Experiment 2, as you moved the masses outward along the rod, what trend did you
observe in your tension measurements? Did the tension in the string increase, decrease, or
stay the same? Explain why this happened using physics concepts.
According to the data, the tension measurements remained the same for all of the trials.
This value remained the same because the net force acting on the weight needs to be zero. The
force of gravity acting on the hanging mass is constant for all trials since it is the g constant
times the weight of the mass. Therefore, for the net force to be zero, the force of tension in the
rope would remain constant as well.
E) In Experiment 2, did your theoretical moment of inertia match your measured value?
Do you observe the same trend as you moved the moveable mass in your theoretical
moment of inertia as you measured?
The theoretical moment of inertia was very close to the measured values. According to
the table, the theoretical values were slightly higher, but the difference between the values
seemed to be around 0.0010kg m^2 to 0.0040kg m^2. The same trend was also observed in the
theoretical values as in the measured values, since the values also increased as the mass was
moved outwards.
F) In Experiment 3, what trend did you observe in the measured average time when you
moved to the larger radius pulley? Explain why this happened using physics concepts.
When we moved to the second smallest pulley, the average time decreased when
compared to the same weight configuration on the smallest pulley. This is because as the radius
increases, the amount of torque is greater. This causes the system to spin faster.
G) In Experiment 3, what trend did you observe in the angular acceleration when you
moved to the larger radius pulley? Explain why this happened using physics concepts.
When the larger radius pulley is used, the angular acceleration increases. This is because
there is more torque, which is causing the object to spin faster.
H) In Experiment 3, what trend did you observe in the torque when you moved to the
larger radius pulley? Explain why this happened using physics concepts
Torque equals the R vector times the force times the angle between these two vectors.
Since the pulley with the larger radius is being used, the torque increases. The data acquired
shows that the torque increases when the second smallest pulley is used.
Related Documents
Recommended textbooks for you

College Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781938168000
Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger Hinrichs
Publisher:OpenStax College

Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...
Physics
ISBN:9781133939146
Author:Katz, Debora M.
Publisher:Cengage Learning

College Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781305952300
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based Text
Physics
ISBN:9781133104261
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning

University Physics Volume 1
Physics
ISBN:9781938168277
Author:William Moebs, Samuel J. Ling, Jeff Sanny
Publisher:OpenStax - Rice University

Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:9781337553278
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Recommended textbooks for you
- College PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781938168000Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger HinrichsPublisher:OpenStax CollegePhysics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...PhysicsISBN:9781133939146Author:Katz, Debora M.Publisher:Cengage LearningCollege PhysicsPhysicsISBN:9781305952300Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris VuillePublisher:Cengage Learning
- Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based TextPhysicsISBN:9781133104261Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage LearningUniversity Physics Volume 1PhysicsISBN:9781938168277Author:William Moebs, Samuel J. Ling, Jeff SannyPublisher:OpenStax - Rice UniversityPhysics for Scientists and EngineersPhysicsISBN:9781337553278Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. JewettPublisher:Cengage Learning

College Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781938168000
Author:Paul Peter Urone, Roger Hinrichs
Publisher:OpenStax College

Physics for Scientists and Engineers: Foundations...
Physics
ISBN:9781133939146
Author:Katz, Debora M.
Publisher:Cengage Learning

College Physics
Physics
ISBN:9781305952300
Author:Raymond A. Serway, Chris Vuille
Publisher:Cengage Learning

Principles of Physics: A Calculus-Based Text
Physics
ISBN:9781133104261
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning

University Physics Volume 1
Physics
ISBN:9781938168277
Author:William Moebs, Samuel J. Ling, Jeff Sanny
Publisher:OpenStax - Rice University

Physics for Scientists and Engineers
Physics
ISBN:9781337553278
Author:Raymond A. Serway, John W. Jewett
Publisher:Cengage Learning