ADMS-3060-Assignment5

docx

School

York University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

3060

Subject

Philosophy

Date

Jan 9, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

3

Uploaded by AgentFinch2922

Report
According to Schwartz, the core ethical values are: Question 32Answer a. trustworthiness b. caring c. responsiblity d. citizenship e. all of the above Answer Answer The correct answer is: e. all of the above According to Schwartz, the core ethical values are trustworthiness, caring, responsibility, and citizenship. These values are considered universal and are foundational to ethical behavior across various cultures and moral philosophies. You According to Schwartz, a criticism of utilitarianism is that it is very difficult to reliably predict the future and it is not always so clear whether something is a benefit or a cost. Question 33Answer True False Answer Answer True. One criticism of utilitarianism is indeed that it can be challenging to reliably predict the future consequences of actions, and it may not always be clear whether something will result in a net benefit or cost. The utilitarian approach evaluates the morality of an action based on its overall consequences and the balance of pleasure or happiness over pain or suffering. However, in complex situations, predicting and quantifying these consequences can be difficult, making utilitarianism subject to criticism on these grounds. You According to Schwartz, there are three formulations of Kant's categorical imperative: Question 34Answer a. universability b. reversibility c. loyalty d. respect e. a, b and c f. a, b and d Answer Answer The correct answer is: f. a, b, and d According to Schwartz, the three formulations of Kant's categorical imperative are: Universality (or universability): Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law. Reversibility: Act as if the maxim of your action were to become by your will a universal law of nature. Respect (or treating others as ends): Act so that you treat humanity, whether in your own person or in that of any other, never merely as a means to an end but always at the same time as an end.
You According to Schwartz, Kant’s application of the categorical imperative appears to have no criticism at all. Question 35Answer True False Answer Answer False. While Kant's categorical imperative has been influential in ethical philosophy, it is not without criticism. Some common criticisms include its potential rigidity, the difficulty in determining what counts as a universalizable maxim, and the challenges in applying it to complex real-world situations. Critics argue that it may not provide clear guidance in situations where moral duties conflict or when the consequences of actions are uncertain. While the categorical imperative has strengths, it has also faced scrutiny and debate within the field of ethics. You According to Schwartz, Bentham described utilitarianism as: Question 36Answer a. the greatest good for the least number of people b. the least amount of good for the least number of people c. the least amount of good for the greatest number of people d. the greatest good for the greatest number of people e. the amount of good is not determined by the number of people Answer Answer The correct answer is: d. the greatest good for the greatest number of people Bentham described utilitarianism as the principle of seeking the greatest happiness or greatest good for the greatest number of people. This idea forms the core of the utilitarian ethical theory, which evaluates actions based on their overall consequences in terms of maximizing pleasure or happiness and minimizing pain or suffering for the greatest number. You According to Schwartz, an action does not have to respect the moral rights of individuals affected by the action. Question 37Answer True False Answer Answer False. According to Schwartz, an action, to be considered ethical, must respect the moral rights of individuals affected by the action. Moral rights, such as the right to life, liberty, and privacy, are an essential component of ethical decision-making. Schwartz identifies respect for moral rights as one of the core ethical values. Actions that violate or disregard the moral rights of individuals are seen as ethically problematic.
You Under the moral concept of justice (or fairness), what’s fair is always just, and what’s just is always fair. Question 38Answer True False Answer Answer False. While justice and fairness are related concepts, they are not always synonymous. In some ethical theories, justice is seen as a broader concept that encompasses fairness, but the terms are not always used interchangeably. Additionally, different people and cultures may have varying interpretations of what is fair or just. In ethical discussions, justice often involves the fair and equitable distribution of resources, opportunities, and benefits. However, the relationship between justice and fairness can be complex, and what one considers fair may not necessarily align with another person's concept of justice. Therefore, it is not accurate to say that what's fair is always just, and what's just is always fair in all contexts.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help