JOURNAL #4
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Kennesaw State University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
101
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
2
Uploaded by MagistrateFlag13065
IDRISS BAYIHA JOURNAL #4. FALACIES.
Bandwagon Appeals:
For my first choice as subtopic of Fallacies of Emotional Argument, I chose to dive
into the realm of “
Bandwagon Appeals
”. Bandwagon Appeals are a type of persuasive technique that relies on the argument that because something is popular or widely accepted, it must be right or good. This approach aims to appeal to people's desire to conform and belong to a group, as well as their fear of missing out on something. The Bandwagons appeals approach weakens one's argument because popularity or widespread acceptance does not necessarily indicate the correctness or quality of an idea or product. It is possible for something to be popular but still harmful, unethical, or of low quality. Relying on popularity as a basis for accepting an idea or product can lead to poor decision-making and overlook important factors such as individual values and critical analysis.
Begging the Question:
Begging the Question is a logical fallacy where the argument assumes the conclusion to be true without providing any evidence or justification. In other words, the premise of the argument is the same as the conclusion. This fallacious approach is problematic because it doesn't provide
any new information or evidence to support the conclusion, but rather just assumes it to be true. It can also lead to circular reasoning and an endless cycle of repeating the same argument without ever providing any substantive evidence to support the conclusion.
Stacking the Deck:
“Stacking the deck" refers to a manipulative tactic in which someone sets up a situation in their favor by arranging the circumstances or information to guarantee a specific outcome. This can involve selecting biased data or manipulating the rules to exclude unfavorable options, thereby tilting the playing field in their favor. Stacking the deck is fallacious because it relies on a deceptive and unfair approach to achieve a predetermined outcome. This tactic denies participants or stakeholders a fair and impartial opportunity to engage with the situation, making it difficult or impossible to obtain reliable and valid results. Additionally, it undermines the credibility of the person who uses it, as it suggests a lack
of confidence in their own arguments or ability to win on merit.
Fallacy story:
My cousin Daunte was arguing with his friend, Sarah, about the effectiveness of a diet for basketball. Daunte claimed that the diet was not effective because he had tried it and did not see any results. Sarah countered that she knew many people who had seen great results with the same diet. Daunte
quickly dismissed Sarah's argument, claiming that his experience was more valid than the experiences of others. Daunte argument is an example of Hasty generalization. He is making a sweeping conclusion based on his limited personal experience, ignoring the fact that other people may have had different experiences. Daunte is assuming that because the diet did not work for him, it must not work for anyone else. This is an unfair and unfounded assumption that ignores the complexity of individual differences and
circumstances. Hasty generalization is a common fallacy in arguments, and it occurs when someone draws a conclusion based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence. In this case, Daunte’s argument is based solely on his own experience, which is not enough to make a definitive judgment about the effectiveness of the diet. Sarah's counterargument, on the other hand, is based on a larger sample size and therefore has more validity. By using hasty generalization in his argument, Daunte is not only making an unfair conclusion but also limiting his own understanding of the topic. He is not considering other factors that may have influenced his lack of success with the diet, and he is ignoring the potential benefits that others have experienced. It's important to recognize and avoid fallacies like hasty generalizations in order to have more productive and accurate discussions.
Films I’m considering: The films I’m considering researching are “Taxi Driver” “Dead Poets Society” and “Forrest Gump.” I chose these movies simply because I’ve just been waiting to digest the
IDRISS BAYIHA JOURNAL #4. FALACIES.
complexities of these iconic cinematic masterpieces The movie "Taxi Driver" presents issues such as loneliness, mental health, and violence, particularly in urban areas. These issues are important to research and understand as they continue to be prevalent in society today and have a significant impact on individuals and communities. By examining these issues, we can better understand their underlying causes and develop effective strategies to address them. The movie "Dead Poet's Society" presents issues such as conformity, societal expectations, and the importance of individuality and self-expression. These issues are important to research and understand as they impact individuals' personal growth and development, particularly in the education system. By examining these issues, we can better understand how societal pressures and expectations can limit creativity and expression and develop strategies to support individuality and personal growth. Lastly, the movie "Forrest Gump" presents issues such as disability, race, and the impact of historical events on individuals' lives. These issues are important to research and understand as they highlight the importance of inclusivity and equality in society. By examining these issues, we can better understand the experiences of individuals who face discrimination and marginalization, and work towards creating a more just and equitable society for all.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help