Take Quiz False Question 5 0.2 / 0.2 pts Judith Jarvis Thomson suggests that, if you were to unwillingly find yourself hooked up to a famous violinist, and be told that their life depended on being kept hooked up to you for nine months, you would have a moral responsibility to save the violinist's life. The violinist, by virtue of their right to life, would have a right to the use of your body. True. The right to life trumps your own right to autonomy. It would be seriously morally indecent of you to leave the violinist to die. True. By virtue of hypothetical consent, you consented to being hooked up to the violinist, and it is your responsibility to stay hooked up until they are healthy enough to live independently. False. Thomson, defending the anti-natalist view, would think you had a moral responsibility to kill the violinist, and alleviate any potential future suffering. False. It may be morally good for you to do so, but the violinist has no right to your body. Question 6 0.2 / 0.2 pts According to Judith Jarvis Thomson, if someone S should give another person T something x, then T has a right to that something x. True False Question 7 0.2 / 0.2 pts Unlike other views of why killing is prima facie morally wrong, Don Marquis argues that his view has the advantage of very clearly articulating why it would be wrong to kill a child, or a mentally ill person. ‘a1 Exit
