Written Assignment 6
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Thomas Edison State College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1300
Subject
Philosophy
Date
Jun 2, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by Vin375
1
Writing Assignment 6
Thomas Edison State University
PHI-1300 Intro to Critical Reasoning
Jeff Sellars
January 7, 2024
2
Writing Assignment 6
1.
In your own words, explain the difference between deductive and inductive arguments. Write
down two examples of each.
Deductive arguments are when the premises given are proven and accepted, which results in a conclusion that is absolutely true. The conclusion in a deductive argument is guaranteed to be true with absolute certainty as opposed to an inductive argument, where a conclusion may only be probably true.
Deductive argument examples:
All presidents are over 35 years old. Joe Biden is president. Therefore, Joe Biden is over 35 years old.
The first sentence is a premise that categorizes "All presidents" as being over 35 years old. The following sentence identifies Joe Biden as a member of the category "presidents." The conclusion then logically follows the premises and is guaranteed to be true because the premises are true. The bank is closed on holidays. Today is President's Day; therefore, the bank will be closed. The first premise is a known fact. The following premise is that today is the holiday, Presidents Day. The conclusion is drawn from the premises and is guaranteed to be true since the
premises are true.
An inductive argument is when the premises given are true but not with absolute certainty. Inductive reasons use evidence, observations, and examples to make general conclusions. The conclusion is probably true as opposed to guaranteed.
3
Inductive argument examples:
The last three times the 49ers played the Rams, they won, so the 49ers will beat the Rams
this Sunday.
The dog I own is brown. My friend owns a brown dog. Therefore, all dogs are brown.
The premises are based on observations and generalizations. The conclusion draws from the observations and is only possibly true but not guaranteed to be true.
2.
Explain the difference between valid deductive arguments and invalid deductive arguments, and then write down two examples of each.
A valid deductive argument consists of premises that are true and valid and where the conclusion logically follows the premises. Therefore, the conclusion is guaranteed to be true if the premises are true. An invalid deductive argument is where the conclusion does not logically follow the premises. Therefore, the premises fail to prove the conclusion even if the premises are
true. Valid deductive argument examples
:
All fish breathe underwater. A tuna is a fish. Therefore, tuna can breathe underwater.
Tom is over 50 years old, so Tom is over 30 years old. Each premise is true, and the conclusion logically follows the premise; therefore, the deductive argument is valid. Invalid deductive argument examples:
All merlots are red. Fruit punch is red; therefore, fruit punch is a merlot.
All zebras have stripes. All tigers have stripes; therefore, all tigers are zebras.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
3.
Identify the differences between three major types of inductive arguments. Name each type and write down examples of each.
The three major types of inductive arguments are statistical extrapolation, Inductive reasoning by analogy, and cause-and-effect reasoning.
Statistical extrapolation is an inductive argument type where a conclusion is drawn from a generalization about a population based on sample data and statistics analysis.
Statistical extrapolation example:
70% of Major League pitchers are right-handed. Justin is a Major League pitcher; therefore, Justin is right-handed.
Inductive reasoning by analogy is when two or more things share properties, implying that other properties are most likely shared as well.
Inductive reasoning by analogy example:
Humans are mammals. Monkeys are mammals. Humans are warm-blooded. Therefore, monkeys are warm-blooded.
Cause and effect reasoning draws its conclusion from the relationship between a cause and its observed effect.
Cause and effect example:
Smoking causes lung cancer. So, those who smoke will get lung cancer.
4.
What is the difference between a valid argument and a sound argument? Write down two examples of each.
The validity of an argument refers to its structure, where the conclusion logically follows the premises. So, as long as the premises are true, the conclusion is also true. The soundness of an
5
argument is based on whether the premises are true and accepted, which leads to a true conclusion. A valid argument is not always sound, but a sound argument is always valid. Valid argument examples:
All dogs have four legs. Bingo has four legs, so Bingo is a dog.
All medical school graduates become doctors. John went to Harvard Medical School; therefore, John is a doctor.
Sound argument examples:
All high school teachers graduated from college. Mary is a high school teacher; therefore,
she graduated college.
All spiders have eight legs. A tarantula is a spider; therefore, a tarantula has eight legs.