Analysis of Mjor Event - Copy
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Liberty University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
600
Subject
Medicine
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
14
Uploaded by BailiffFlower8278
Analysis of a Major Event: Hurricane Katrina
Jenna Williams
Helms School of Government: Liberty University
HLSC 600: Introduction to Emergency Management
Dr. Jimmie Johnson
October 29, 2023
Abstract
This paper provides an in-depth analysis of the disaster response to Hurricane
Katrina, a turning point that uncovered key vulnerabilities and deficiencies in the United
States' emergency management and response systems. This paper will shine light on the
many problems and complexities inherent in reacting to a catastrophic natural catastrophe
of this magnitude by conducting an in-depth investigation of the various phases of
emergency management, including mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery, and
prevention.
The analysis begins by looking at the pre-impact measures put in place to mitigate
the potential risks presented by the hurricane, highlighting shortcomings in the design
and maintenance of the region's infrastructure, such as the levee and floodwall systems,
as well as the lack of comprehensive land-use planning and zoning laws in vulnerable
areas. It then looks into the issues encountered during the preparation phase, underlining
the difficulties in carrying out efficient evacuation preparations, particularly for
marginalized and economically disadvantaged groups. The response operations at the
municipal and federal levels will also be examined, revealing systemic flaws and delays
that worsened the suffering of individuals affected by the tragedy. It emphasizes the
critical importance of excellent communication, coordination, and resource allocation in
ensuring a timely and efficient response.
The paper also addresses the complexities and obstacles inherent in the long-term
recovery process, emphasizing the necessity for comprehensive plans to meet the affected
population's housing, infrastructure, and community rehabilitation needs. Furthermore, it
emphasizes the importance of proactive prevention measures, such as reevaluating
infrastructure systems, improving evacuation protocols, and implementing robust
communication and coordination mechanisms, to reduce the risk of similar disasters in
the future.
This research ends with a set of practical recommendations aimed at informing
and improving future disaster response plans based on lessons gained from the faults and
triumphs of the Hurricane Katrina response. The findings highlight the vital significance
of proactive planning, effective coordination, and inclusive emergency management
approaches, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive and resilient framework to better
protect communities and mitigate the impact of natural disasters.
Introduction
Following Hurricane Katrina in 2005, the United States was confronted with the
harsh realities of the complexities and problems inherent in effective disaster response
and management (Cigler,2007). Hurricane Katrina, one of the most destructive natural
disasters in American history, not only caused massive destruction and loss of life, but it
also exposed fundamental vulnerabilities in the country's emergency management
infrastructure (Daniels et al., 2006). This sad occurrence acted as a catalyst for a critical
evaluation of the entire emergency management cycle, emphasizing the important
importance of proactive planning, effective coordination, and adaptive methods in
lessening the effects of natural catastrophes and developing community resilience.
Understanding the different dynamics of efficient disaster management
necessitates delving into the underlying principles that comprise the full emergency
management cycle (2007). The emergency management cycle operates as a dynamic
framework that leads and educates the methodical approach to addressing and
minimizing the impacts of natural calamities, from the pre-disaster phase of mitigation
and readiness to the immediate reaction and following recovery activities (2006). As a
result, a thorough examination of the various stages of the emergency management cycle
not only highlights the critical components of effective disaster response, but also
provides valuable insights into the interconnectedness and interdependence of the various
stages in mitigating the risks and vulnerabilities associated with natural disasters.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Mitigation
•
The maintenance and fortification of the levee and floodwall systems were
continuing measures aimed at maintaining the Gulf Coast against future storm
surges and flooding, with frequent inspections and repairs scheduled to maintain
their structural integrity (Daniels et al., 2006).
•
The execution of coastal restoration projects and wetland preservation projects
was part of a broader plan to reinforce natural barriers and increase the region's
resilience to the impact of severe weather events, highlighting the essential
function of environmental conservation in mitigating the risks presented by
hurricanes and flooding (2006).
•
Efforts were launched to enhance the quality and standards of building
infrastructure and engineering, with the goal of addressing weaknesses in the
design and construction of the levee and floodwall systems, with a focus on
integrating cutting-edge technology and best practices to guarantee better
resilience and performance in the face of severe weather conditions (2006).
Preparedness:
•
Coordination and collaboration among local, state, and federal agencies were
improved, with simplified procedures for communication and joint preparedness
exercises held on a regular basis to boost the effectiveness and effectiveness of
response efforts in the event of a natural disaster, highlighting the vital function of
inter-agency cooperation in fostering a cohesive and comprehensive approach to
emergency management (Parker et al., 2009).
•
To address the challenges faced by individuals lacking the means to evacuate
safely and quickly, designated evacuation routes and the deployment of
evacuation assistance programs, specifically tailored to the needs of vulnerable
and marginalized populations, were implemented, emphasizing the importance of
ensuring equitable access to resources and support during crisis situations (2009).
•
The implementation of public awareness campaigns and educational programs
focused on disaster preparedness and emergency planning was stepped up, with
the goal of equipping communities with the knowledge and resources they need to
respond to and mitigate the impact of natural disasters, emphasizing the critical
role of proactive public engagement and education in fostering a culture of
resiliency and preparedness within at-risk communities (Daniels et al., 2006).
Warning Systems & Communication
During Hurricane Katrina, the existing warning and communication systems faced
significant obstacles and flaws, resulting in widespread confusion, delays, and
insufficient transmission of essential information (Meeds, 2006). These flaws impeded a
quick and efficient reaction to the oncoming crisis, intensifying the devastating impact on
the impacted populations. Several critical shortcomings within the warning and
communication systems contributed to the crisis's collapse in communication and
coordination:
•
Poor warning dissemination: Despite the superior meteorological forecasting
skills at the time, there were substantial shortcomings in effectively
communicating the intensity and direction of the hurricane to Gulf Coast
communities (Cole et al., 2009). The complexities of the information, along with
a lack of targeted outreach attempts to vulnerable communities, resulted in
widespread misunderstanding and a failure to appropriately express the gravity of
the situation, impeding early evacuations and preparations (Meeds, 2006).
•
Failures in communication infrastructure: The hurricane's impact severely harmed
the region's communication infrastructure, including landline and cellular
networks, making it difficult for officials to communicate timely updates and
crucial information to the public and emergency response teams (Miller, 2006).
The widespread failure of communication connections hampered the coordination
of rescue and relief operations, leaving many people trapped and unable to get
crucial help (Meeds, 2006)
Evacuation Planning & Sheltering:
During Hurricane Katrina, the evacuation and sheltering processes encountered major
obstacles and limitations, resulting in significant chaos, delays, and insufficient support
for the displaced and vulnerable populations (McGinty et al., 2017). Several major
shortcomings within the evacuation planning and sheltering processes contributed to the
collapse in efficient crisis management, aggravating the suffering and dislocation felt by
affected populations. The following are key elements that caused the failures in
evacuation planning and sheltering during the hurricane:
•
Limited transportation resources: A lack of suitable transportation resources
delayed the evacuation planning process, greatly impeding the timely and orderly
evacuation of inhabitants, particularly those without personal vehicles (Wolshon,
2006). Because of the restricted availability of buses and other modes of
transportation, as well as the sheer size of the impacted people, there was
considerable traffic congestion and logistical issues, hindering the safe and quick
evacuation of at-risk individuals (2006).
•
Poor shelter provisions: Individuals seeking refuge from the storm had
considerable obstacles due to a lack of accessible and well-equipped shelters, in
addition to a lack of comprehensive planning for handling large numbers of
evacuees (Phillips et al., 2012). Many of the approved shelters rapidly exceeded
capacity, leaving many evacuees without suitable accommodations, basic
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
amenities, and vital services, compounding displaced individuals' challenges in
finding safe and secure refuge alternatives (2012) .
•
Issues with authority coordination: The lack of efficient coordination and
collaboration among local, state, and federal agencies hampered the
implementation of evacuation and sheltering plans, resulting in confusion, delays,
and a disconnected approach to crisis management (Phillips et al., 2012). The
absence of a unified command structure and standardized protocols for managing
evacuation and sheltering operations contributed to the inefficiencies and
shortcomings observed during the crisis, emphasizing the importance of fostering
a cohesive and coordinated response to ensure the well-being and safety of
displaced populations (McGinty et al., 2017).
Special Needs Population:
The challenges and issues surrounding the special needs population during Hurricane
Katrina highlighted critical failures and shortcomings in disaster preparedness and
response strategies, emphasizing the urgent need for targeted support and tailored
assistance for individuals with specific medical, physical, and cognitive requirements
(
Gheytanchi,2007)
. Several significant elements contributed to the crisis's deficiencies in
meeting the requirements of the special needs community, resulting in widespread
vulnerabilities and compounding the difficulties these individuals had in getting
necessary assistance and services. Among the critical issues mentioned are:
•
The lack of specialized evacuation protocols along with specialized means of
transportation for those with disabilities, medical issues, and other special needs
inhibited the safe and prompt evacuation of this vulnerable population (Cameron,
2007). The failure to include comprehensive and tailored strategies for
accommodating these individuals' unique needs in the evacuation planning
process resulted in widespread difficulties and increased risks for those with
mobility limitations, medical dependencies, and other specialized needs.
•
Inadequate accessibility in shelters and relief facilities: Individuals with
disabilities and special needs faced significant challenges due to the limited
accessibility and accommodations in designated shelters and relief facilities,
rendering many of these locations inaccessible and ill-equipped to provide the
necessary support and services (
Gheytanchi,2007)
.
Response
•
At both the local and federal levels, the response to Hurricane Katrina was
defined by many mistakes and failures. Rescue and relief operations were delayed
and chaotic, exacerbating the misery of those stuck in flooded areas, leaving many
stranded for days without food, water, or medical treatment.
•
The failure to develop efficient communication channels between different levels
of government and emergency agencies resulted in a lack of coordination and a
disorganized approach to giving help and support to catastrophe victims
(
Gheytanchi,2007)
.
Recovery
•
Following Hurricane Katrina, the recovery process was vast and lengthy,
requiring substantial efforts to reconstruct houses, infrastructure, and communities
(Birch,2006). The process was highlighted by difficulties in providing enough
homes and assistance to the displaced population, particularly the most vulnerable
populations, such as low-income families and the elderly.
•
The maintenance of the levee system and the implementation of substantial flood
protection measures were essential components of the rehabilitation effort, with
the goal of reducing the danger of future catastrophe (Wengner,2015). Efforts
were also undertaken to promote community resilience and disaster preparedness
through enhanced infrastructure and emergency response structures.
Crisis Counseling & Assistance
Following Hurricane Katrina's devastation, the implementation of Crisis Counseling and
Assistance (CCA) programs played a critical role in providing critical mental health
support as well as vital services to those impacted, providing a lifeline of emotional and
psychological assistance to individuals dealing with the trauma and distress caused by the
devastating hurricane (Marbley, 2007). These programs were created to address the
disaster's acute psychological and emotional toll, providing a variety of counseling,
therapy, and support services customized to the specific needs of individuals and
communities dealing with the aftermath. The following are some significant
characteristics of the Crisis Counseling and Assistance efforts developed in the aftermath
of Hurricane Katrina:
•
Community-based outreach and support: The CCA programs were mostly
community-driven, with an emphasis on localized outreach campaigns and
community engagement attempts to promote a sense of solidarity, resilience, and
emotional support in the impacted neighborhoods (Marbley, 2007). Crisis
counselors and mental health specialists were dispatched to the hardest-hit areas,
providing compassionate and culturally sensitive counseling services to
individuals and families dealing with the emotional trauma and suffering caused
by the disaster.
•
Trauma-informed counseling and therapy: Recognizing the profound
psychological and emotional ramifications of such a horrific incident, the Crisis
Counseling and Assistance programs prioritized trauma-informed counseling and
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
treatment approaches (Birch,2006). The programs focused on offering evidence-
based interventions, support groups, and individual counseling sessions that were
designed to address the unique needs and problems that individuals and
communities experienced in processing and coping with the hurricane's impact
(Marbley,2007).
•
Collaboration and resource mobilization: To simplify the delivery of
comprehensive and coordinated support services to affected communities, the
Crisis Counseling and Assistance programs fostered collaborative partnerships
between local, state, and federal agencies, as well as community-based
organizations and mental health service providers. These collaborations facilitated
resource mobilization, capacity building, and the establishment of long-term
mental health infrastructure to assure the long-term provision of counseling and
assistance programs for the populations affected by Hurricane Katrina.
Prevention
•
Following Hurricane Katrina, there was an established attempt to put careful
processes in place to prevent similar disasters in the future (Daniels et al, 2006).
This entailed reevaluating the levee system, creating more effective evacuation
plans, and implementing enhanced communication and coordination mechanisms
among multiple government departments and disaster response organizations.
•
Furthermore, there was a greater emphasis on promoting public knowledge about
the risks of living in susceptible locations, as well as the significance of personal
preparedness. This was done to ensure that people and communities are better
prepared to respond to and minimize the effects of future disasters.
Hurricane Katrina acted as an acute warning of the inherent risks and difficulties
in disaster management and response, forcing a critical reconsideration of the United
States' emergency management infrastructure. The hurricane's disastrous impact, defined
by enormous destruction and loss, exposed significant flaws in the country's ability to
successfully plan for, respond to, and recover from such catastrophic disasters
(Birch,2006). The investigation into the comprehensive management of this disaster
highlights the critical need for a paradigm shift in emergency management strategies,
emphasizing the importance of a multifaceted approach that includes robust mitigation
measures, efficient preparedness protocols, cohesive response mechanisms,
comprehensive recovery initiatives, and proactive prevention strategies.
While pre-disaster mitigation initiatives, such as the construction and maintenance
of levees and floodwalls, were in place, flaws in their design and construction highlighted
the critical need for comprehensive and resilient infrastructure solutions to mitigate the
impact of natural disasters. In addition, the lack of comprehensive land-use planning and
zoning legislation in susceptible areas underscored the need for a more integrated and
forward-thinking approach to environmental protection and catastrophe risk reduction.
Significant mistakes and shortcomings hindered the response to Hurricane
Katrina, exposing key gaps in communication, coordination, and resource allocation
(Chua et al., 2007). The disorganized and delayed deployment of rescue and relief
activities highlighted the critical need for streamlined and well-coordinated response
systems to enable timely and efficient help delivery to individuals in need (Colten,2008).
Furthermore, the enormous recovery operations highlighted the critical importance of
giving comprehensive support and resources to the displaced people, particularly the
most vulnerable groups, in order to ensure their rapid and sustained rehabilitation (Chua
at al.,2007). The emphasis placed on preventative efforts in the aftermath of Hurricane
Katrina underscored the critical importance of fostering proactive and adaptive strategies
to prevent similar disasters in the future, emphasizing the importance of comprehensive
infrastructure reassessment, effective communication protocols, and robust public
awareness campaigns to foster a culture of preparedness and resilience within vulnerable
communities. Lessons from Hurricane Katrina continue to inform ongoing efforts to
improve emergency management strategies, emphasizing the critical imperative of
fostering a comprehensive, inclusive, and resilient framework to mitigate the devastating
impact of natural disasters and safeguard communities' well-being and safety
(Colten,2008).
References
Birch, E. L., & Wachter, S. (Eds.). (2006). Rebuilding urban places after disaster: Lessons
from Hurricane Katrina. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Cameron, C. T. (2007). Emergency preparedness for people with disabilities and other
special needs: Another look after Katrina. Center for Disability and Special Needs
Preparedness.
Chua, A. Y., Kaynak, S., & Foo, S. S. (2007). An analysis of the delayed response to
Hurricane Katrina through the lens of knowledge management. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(3), 391-403.
Cigler, B. A. (2007). The “big questions” of Katrina and the 2005 great flood of New
Orleans. Public Administration Review, 67, 64-76.
Cole, T. W., & Fellows, K. L. (2008). Risk communication failure: A case study of New
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Orleans and Hurricane Katrina. Southern Communication Journal, 73(3), 211-228.
Colten, C. E., Kates, R. W., & Laska, S. B. (2008). Three years after Katrina: Lessons for
community resilience. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development,
50(5), 36-47.
Daniels, R., Kettl, D., & Kunreuther, H. (Eds.). (2006). On risk and disaster: Lessons
from Hurricane Katrina. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Gall, M., & Cutter, S. L. (2019). 2005 events and outcomes: Hurricane Katrina and
beyond. In Emergency Management (pp. 191-217). Routledge.
Gheytanchi, A., Joseph, L., Gierlach, E., Kimpara, S., Housley, J., Franco, Z. E., &
Beutler, L. E. (2007). The dirty dozen: twelve failures of the hurricane katrina response
and how psychology can help. American Psychologist, 62(2), 118.
Marbley, A. F. (2007). In the Wake of Hurricane Katrina: Delivering Crisis Mental Health
Services to Host Communities. Multicultural Education, 15(2), 17-23.
McGinty, M. D., Burke, T. A., Resnick, B., Barnett, D. J., Smith, K. C., & Rutkow, L.
(2017). Decision processes and determinants of hospital evacuation and shelter-in-place
during Hurricane Sandy.
Journal of public health management and practice
,
23
(1), 29-
36.
Meeds, H. K. (2006).
Communication challenges during incidents of national
significance: A lesson from Hurricane Katrina
(pp. 17013-5050). Carlisle Barracks,
Carlisle, PA: US Army War College.
Miller, R. (2006). Hurricane katrina: Communications & infrastructure impacts. National
Defense University.
Parker, C. F., Stern, E. K., Paglia, E., & Brown, C. (2009). Preventable catastrophe? The
hurricane Katrina disaster revisited. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis management,
17(4), 206-220.
Phillips, B. D., Wikle, T. A., Hakim, A. H., & Pike, L. (2012). Establishing and operating
shelters after Hurricane Katrina.
International Journal of Emergency Management
,
8
(2),
153-167.
Wenger, C. (2015). Better use and management of levees: reducing flood risk in a
changing climate. Environmental Reviews, 23(2), 240-255.
Wolshon, B. (2006). Evacuation planning and engineering for Hurricane Katrina. Bridge,
36(1), 27-34.