Mod3 Discussion Post

docx

School

Metropolitan Community College, Omaha *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

MISC

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Date

Dec 6, 2023

Type

docx

Pages

2

Uploaded by MrDickButtkiss

Report
90% confidence interval (unrounded) = (2.271291284632333, 2.503908715367668) 90% confidence interval (rounded) = ( 2.27 , 2.5 ) 99% confidence interval (unrounded) = (2.2054613632281557, 2.569738636771845) 99% confidence interval (rounded) = ( 2.21 , 2.57 ) The 90 percent confidence interval is (2.27, 2.5) after being rounded to two decimal places. This shows that we have a 90 percent confidence that the average diameter of the ball bearings is between 2.27 and 2.5 respectively. In regard to the 99 percent confidence interval, it is (2.21, 2.57) after being rounded to two decimal places. This shows us that we have a 99 percent confidence that the average diameter of the ball bearings is between 2.21 and 2.57. It has been claimed from previous studies that the average diameter of ball bearings from this manufacturing process is 2.30 cm. Based on the sample of 50 that you collected, is there evidence to suggest that the average diameter is greater than 2.30 cm? Perform a hypothesis test for the population mean at alpha = 0.01. In your initial post, address the following items: z-test hypothesis test for population mean test-statistic = 1.54 two tailed p-value = 0.1236 The Null Hypothesis would be that the ball bearings are µ = 2.30 cm as a result of this manufacturing process. (H 0 : µ = 2.30 cm) The alternative to this hypothesis would be a Right-Tailed Hypothesis with the average diameter of the ball bearings being greater than 2.30 cm with the same manufacturing process. (H a : µ > 2.30 cm) The level of significance regarding the data set is .01, meaning that the chance that the average diameter of ball bearings being greater than 2.30cm is 1 percent.
When acknowledging the z-test, the test-statistic was 1.54 with a right-tailed p- value of .0618 (since the hypothesis test in one-tailed) in regard to the alternative hypothesis. As a result, I believe that the null hypothesis to be more accurate and should not be rejected. Since the p-value is greater than the significance level of .01, there is insufficient evidence supporting the alternative hypothesis and therefore, the alternative hypothesis should be rejected and the Null Hypothesis kept.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help