PHYS 1433 Lab 4 Linear uniformly accelerated motion
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
CUNY New York City College of Technology *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
1433
Subject
Mechanical Engineering
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
docx
Pages
6
Uploaded by CorporalHawkMaster994
10/03/23
PHYS 1433
Lab 4: Linear Uniformly Accelerated Motion
Objective:
In this lab experiment our group determined the principals of a projectiles
positions by finding the relationship between gravity and the horizontal/vertical directions of
motion, and whether they are independent of projectile mass or not. The acceleration of the
moving projectile was measured in order to verify the accelerated motion.
Theoretical Background:
As an object changes position, the value of its position
coordinates will change with time. This change in value due to its change in position is known as
displacement which is expressed as
△
X = X
2
– X
1
.
When the object changes its initial position
with time, this is known as velocity in the formula;
V =
△
X/
△T.
In determining acceleration,
we use the formula
A = V
2
– V
1
/ t
2
– t
1
, and for average acceleration the formula A = v-v(
Initial
)/t
can be used. By receiving the data calculated we can create a graph needed for finding the slope
which would be equal to the acceleration’s magnitude.
Procedure:
1.
We began by setting up the dynamic tracks and photogates to determine the
distances between photogates as shown in figure 1.
2.
The length of the flag was measured, and the data results were recorded in the
given table.
3.
Two photogates were utilized in the experiment. Photogate #1’s accessory
plug was inserted into Digital channel 1 on the computers workshop software.
4.
Photogates #2’s accessory was then plugged into digital channel 2 workshop
software.
5.
Photogate #2 was then placed at the distance X = 0.50m below photogate #1,
6.
The given object was set up at its starting position, then released from that
same point over a repeated number of times as specified in the given table.
Graphs:
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
0.64
0.66
0.68
0.7
0.72
0.74
0.76
0.78
0.8
f(x) = 0.18 x + 0.53
R² = 0.96
Velocity V. Time (T
)
△
Time, t,s
Velocity,m/s
0.8
0.9
1
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1.5
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
f(x) = 0.62 x
R² = 1
Distance V. Time
Time t, s
Distance x,n
Sample Calculations:
TIME
△
T
0
,
S
TIME
△
T,
S
Velocit
y
V=
△
L/
△
T
,
m/s
Time
Betwee
n
Photoga
tes
t,
S
Accele
ration
A
from
(4),
m/s^2
Dista
nce
betw
een
phot
ogate
s
x, m
Distan
ce X
from
(6),
x,m
%
differ
ence
for
X
Dista
nce X
from
(8),
m
Velocit
y
V0=
△
L/
△
T
,
m/s
0.08
0.0573
0.69
0.8356
0.2273
0.5
0.4943
1.14%
0.447
6
0.5
0.0849
0.0567
0.7
1.0111
0.2265
0.6
0.5014
17.9%
0.464
9
0.47
0.0832
0.0536
0.74
1.1296
0.2301
0.7
0.5658
20.6%
0.522
0.471
0.086
0.0525
0.76
1.2845
0.2296
0.8
0.6407
23.3%
0.552
7
0.465
0.0857
0.0506
0.79
1.4161
0.2288
0.9
0.7123
23.2%
0.599
2
0.466
Average
Acceleration
{m/s^2}
Slope of Graph
{m/s^2}
Acceleration
from slope of
Graph
{m/s^2}
Percent Difference
for Acceleration
0.2285
0.1792
0.619
15.56
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Conclusion:
To conclude, we measured the acceleration of a moving cart and acceleration
by determining how long it took for an object to pass through both photogates. After gathering
data for the table our group assumed that the velocity of an object clearly affects its acceleration.
Despite the distance, time, and velocity having varying units throughout the experiment, the
acceleration remained roughly similar, as shown in the table for the average. Though, when
calculating the percent difference for acceleration it came out to be 15% which is 5% higher than
the acceptable error which means a mistake was made somewhere in the experiment, meaning
the kinematic equation was not verified. {
Slope = 0.1792 m/s^2 / Acceleration from graph =
0.619 m/s^2}
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Related Documents
Related Questions
Chapter 12 - Lecture Notes.pptx: (MAE 272-01) (SP25) DY...
Scores
arrow_forward
62. •A 5-kg object is constrained to move along a straight
line. Its initial speed is 12 m/s in one direction, and its final
speed is 8 m/s in the
opposite
Complete the graph of
force versus time with
direction.
F (N)
(s)
appropriate values for
both variables (Figure
7-26). Several answers
are correct, just be sure
that your answer is
internally consistent.
Figure 7-26 Problem 62
arrow_forward
Help
arrow_forward
You are part of a car accident investigative team, looking into a case where a car drove off a bridge. You are using the lab projectile launcher to simulate the accident and to test your mathematical model (an equation that applies to the situation) before you apply the model to the accident data. We are assuming we can treat the car as a projectile.
arrow_forward
Q8
arrow_forward
Q4) In Fig.2, The location of the tool, 77 is not
accurately known. Using force control, the
robot feels around with the tool tip until it
inserts it into the socket (or Goal) at loca-
tiongr.
Once in this "calibration" configuration
(in which (G) and (T) are coincident), the
position of the robot, is figured out by
reading the joint angle sensors and com-
puting the kinematics.
Assuming T and T are known, give the
transform equation to compute the un-
known tool frame,T.
2
Fig.2
arrow_forward
Biomechanies
arrow_forward
Subject name (Analytical Mechanics) Peace be upon you. I want all the laws that help me solve mathematical problems in the mentioned topics.
arrow_forward
Physics 121 Spring 2021 - Document #11: Homework #04 & Reading Assignment page 4 of 8
Problem 1: Gnome Ride - This from a Previous Exam
I.
A Gnome of given mass M goes on the Gnome Ride as follows: He stands on a horizontal
platform that is connected to a large piston so that the platform is driven vertically with a position
as a function of time according to the following equation:
y(t) = C cos(wt)
Here w is a constant given angular frequency, C is a given constant (with appropriate physical
units) and y represents the vertical position, positive upward as indicated.
Part (a) - What is the velocity of the Gnome at time t = 0? Explain your work. Present your
answer in terms of the given parameters
Part (b) – What is the net force on the Gnome at time t = 0? Explain your work. Present your
answer in terms of the given parameters
Part (c) – What is the Normal Force on the Gnome at time t = 0? Explain your work. Present
your answer in terms of the given parameters
Some Possibly Useful…
arrow_forward
i just need part 3
arrow_forward
I need only handwritten otherwise I'll dislike
Here theta = 10 degree , tension T = 17 lb , coefficient of rolling resistance = 7.40 x 10 ^-2 in
arrow_forward
mylabmastering.pearson.com
Chapter 12 - Lecture Notes.pptx: (MAE 272-01) (SP25) DY...
P Pearson MyLab and Mastering
Scores
arrow_forward
I could really use some assistance on part b,c,d,e,f
arrow_forward
Please answer by own do not copy paste from other answer.
arrow_forward
You are watching a live concert. You can also find the concert streaming live on Spotify. About how far must you stand from the stage in order for
the live concert and the live stream to be perfectly in sync?
HINT: Assume the radio signal (Spotify) has to travel all the way around the Earth.
circumference of the Earth (average): 40,041,000 m
Speed of sound: 345 m/s
Speed of light: 300,000,000 m/s
arrow_forward
The rapid progress of engineering design and information technology has caused difficulties in analyzing system reliability. Because of the increased complexity in system reliability structure (component/subsystem interfaces), many unexpected failure modes could occur, and their behaviors are interdependent. At a system’s design and development stage, the main challenge in analyzing a complex system is the failure uncertainty introduced by the incomplete knowledge of the system. This makes it hard to decompose system reliability into subsystem/component reliability in a deterministic manner, such as series or parallel systems. As a result, some common reliability analysis tools such as fault tree (FT) and reliability block diagram (RBD) become inadequate. Do you agree, why or why not? Are there any other approaches to system reliability assessment beside these tools at the early system’s design and development stage (what are these approaches)?
arrow_forward
b₂
k₂
www
Radial direction
Disk
Disk
rotation
Parameters for the Optical Disk Drive System
Laser
k₁
www
Pick-up
head
(PUH)
Cart
Spindle
motor
Optical Disk Drive System Parameter
b₁
PUH mass, m
Chassis
PUH suspension stiffness, k
PUH suspension friction, b,
Chassis/cart mass, m
Chassis suspension stiffness, k,
Chassis suspension friction, by
Numerical Value
6(10) kg
60 N/m
0.03 N-s/m
0.124 kg
1960 N/m
6.23 N-s/m
Frame
Rubber vibration
Cart servo
motor
isolation mounts
arrow_forward
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you

Principles of Heat Transfer (Activate Learning wi...
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9781305387102
Author:Kreith, Frank; Manglik, Raj M.
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Related Questions
- Chapter 12 - Lecture Notes.pptx: (MAE 272-01) (SP25) DY... Scoresarrow_forward62. •A 5-kg object is constrained to move along a straight line. Its initial speed is 12 m/s in one direction, and its final speed is 8 m/s in the opposite Complete the graph of force versus time with direction. F (N) (s) appropriate values for both variables (Figure 7-26). Several answers are correct, just be sure that your answer is internally consistent. Figure 7-26 Problem 62arrow_forwardHelparrow_forwardYou are part of a car accident investigative team, looking into a case where a car drove off a bridge. You are using the lab projectile launcher to simulate the accident and to test your mathematical model (an equation that applies to the situation) before you apply the model to the accident data. We are assuming we can treat the car as a projectile.arrow_forwardQ8arrow_forwardQ4) In Fig.2, The location of the tool, 77 is not accurately known. Using force control, the robot feels around with the tool tip until it inserts it into the socket (or Goal) at loca- tiongr. Once in this "calibration" configuration (in which (G) and (T) are coincident), the position of the robot, is figured out by reading the joint angle sensors and com- puting the kinematics. Assuming T and T are known, give the transform equation to compute the un- known tool frame,T. 2 Fig.2arrow_forwardBiomechaniesarrow_forwardSubject name (Analytical Mechanics) Peace be upon you. I want all the laws that help me solve mathematical problems in the mentioned topics.arrow_forwardPhysics 121 Spring 2021 - Document #11: Homework #04 & Reading Assignment page 4 of 8 Problem 1: Gnome Ride - This from a Previous Exam I. A Gnome of given mass M goes on the Gnome Ride as follows: He stands on a horizontal platform that is connected to a large piston so that the platform is driven vertically with a position as a function of time according to the following equation: y(t) = C cos(wt) Here w is a constant given angular frequency, C is a given constant (with appropriate physical units) and y represents the vertical position, positive upward as indicated. Part (a) - What is the velocity of the Gnome at time t = 0? Explain your work. Present your answer in terms of the given parameters Part (b) – What is the net force on the Gnome at time t = 0? Explain your work. Present your answer in terms of the given parameters Part (c) – What is the Normal Force on the Gnome at time t = 0? Explain your work. Present your answer in terms of the given parameters Some Possibly Useful…arrow_forwardi just need part 3arrow_forwardI need only handwritten otherwise I'll dislike Here theta = 10 degree , tension T = 17 lb , coefficient of rolling resistance = 7.40 x 10 ^-2 inarrow_forwardmylabmastering.pearson.com Chapter 12 - Lecture Notes.pptx: (MAE 272-01) (SP25) DY... P Pearson MyLab and Mastering Scoresarrow_forwardarrow_back_iosSEE MORE QUESTIONSarrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Heat Transfer (Activate Learning wi...Mechanical EngineeringISBN:9781305387102Author:Kreith, Frank; Manglik, Raj M.Publisher:Cengage Learning

Principles of Heat Transfer (Activate Learning wi...
Mechanical Engineering
ISBN:9781305387102
Author:Kreith, Frank; Manglik, Raj M.
Publisher:Cengage Learning