MATH451-Unit 4 Intellipath - Utility Theory
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Colorado Technical University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
451
Subject
Mathematics
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
6
Uploaded by DoctorFoxMaster850
MATH451 – Unit 4 Intellipath
Utility Theory
One can consider the decision making based on monetary values, but it would be strictly money.
However, a person might be willing to take a risk of performing some function knowing very well that the outcomes may not be in his or her favor. In this section, you would look at these cases and define the attitude of a person toward risk as a utility theory. You would consider the issues involved in determination of utility function and decide if the person is a risk avoider, risk indifferent, or risk seeker.
In other applications, the decisions are made based on the monetary values strictly. However, most of the times people are willing to take risks knowing very well that the outcome of the risks they are taking are not in his or her favor. People spend money on gambling or lottery tickets knowing very well that the chance of winning is almost 0.
Example
Suppose Mary is trying to start a business that if it turned out to be a success, she gets a payoff of $40,000. However, if she fails, she would lose $20,000 in the investment.
Assume the probability of success to be 0.50 and the probability of failure to be 0.50. You need to determine her utility’s value to decide if she should get into the business. You assign a value of 1 for the utility value of success for the best payoff and 0 for the utility value of failure for the worst payoff.
Suppose she is approached by another competitor who is performing the same types of business in the neighborhood, and he wants to discourage her
to enter in his territories by offering her $6,000.
The question is whether or not she should ignore the offer and goes on to the
business or takes the money and forgets the idea.
Expected Monetary Value
The expected monetary value (EMV) of this business is: $40,000 * 0.50 − 20,000 * 0.50 = $10,000.
If she accepts the money, $6,000 would be the EMV value and not the calculated $10,000.
U($6,000) = U($40,000) * 0.5 + U(−$20,000) * 0.5 = 1 * 0.5 + 0 * 0.5 = 0.5.
Risk Avoider
Because she accepted lower than the EMV, she is considered to be a risk avoider.
Calculate the Risk Premium
Indeed, you calculate the
risk premium
as the difference between the monetary amounts that a decision maker is willing to give up to avoid the risk associated with a gamble.
In the case of Mary, the risk premium is: (EMV of gamble) − (Certainty equivalent) =$10,000 − $6,000 = $4,000.
Risk Avoider
If the value of risk premium is positive, the person is
risk avoider
.
Risk Neutral
If the risk premium is 0, the person is considered to be
risk indifferent
or
risk neutral person
.
Risk Seeker
However, if the risk premium is negative, the person is risk seeker. The utility
value changes from one person to another for the very same situations depending how important is to take or avoid the risk to them. Indeed, a person’s utility risk can also vary as the EMV goes higher. People do not mind betting on few dollars for a game or other types of gambling while the same people will not gamble on high price activities.
Using a Treeplan
A treeplan is used to make a decision. You can replace the monetary values by the utility values and the results may or may not turn out to be the same. Suppose Mary has the utility values of U(−20,000) = 0, U($0) = 0.2, and U($40,000) = 1.0.
She wishes to get into that business by rejecting the offer. You can use the treeplan by first performing the calculation based on EMV and then replacing
EMV by utility values.
Figure 1 shows the treeplan suggesting she goes to the business purely based on the monetary values.
Figure 1:
Treeplan Used to Calculate EMV for Mary’s Decision-Making Problem
Figure 2 shows the same treeplan with the exception that utility values are replacing the monetary values. In this case both tree diagrams suggest that she needs to go on with the business.
Figure 2:
Treeplan Used to Calculate Utility Value for Mary’s Decision-
Making Problem
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Q:
Which of the following cannot be Allen’s certainty equivalent value if Allen has a 30% chance of winning a contract for $100,000 and 70% chance of winning another contract for $250,000?
A:
$250,001 OR
$350,000
Q:
A concave function is one that lies below the line connecting points, as shown on the
following graph (OgreBot, 2015):
In formulas, a function
f
is concave if, for any
Suppose that a utility function of monetary return is concave. What does that imply about the attitude toward risk?
A:
Risk-averse
Q:
What is risk premium?
A:
(Expected monetary value (EMV)) − (Certainty equivalent)
Q:
Utility theory is one way of dealing with the fact that people often act in ways that defy the cramped vision of economists. Suppose that you prefer to take $20,000 over a bet that offers a 50% chance of winning $50,000 and a 50% chance of getting nothing.
Are you risk-seeking, risk-averse, or risk-neutral? What is the risk premium?
A:
Risk-averse, >5,000
Q:
What is the value of certainty equivalent?
A:
Between any two payoff values
Q:
What is the range of utility function in the utility theory?
A:
0 ≤ utility function ≤ 1
Q:
What is the value of risk premium for a risk avoider person?
A:
Greater than 0
Q:
What is the value of risk premium for a risk prone person?
A:
Less than 0
Q:
A convex function is one that lies below the line connecting points, as shown on the following graph (Osherovich, 2010):
In formulas, a function
f
is convex if, for any
Suppose that a utility function of monetary return is convex. What does that imply about the attitude toward risk?
A:
Risk-seeking
Q:
An increasing concave utility function implies which of the following?
a.
Loss avoidance, a loss is felt more strongly than an equal gain
b.
Increasing return to scale
c.
Law of diminishing returns
d.
Pareto principle that 80% of the effects comes from 20% of the causes
e.
The Peter principle that people rise to their level of incompetence
A:
a, c
Q:
A:
Q:
A:
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help