d184 task 3

1 Joy R. Magee MSCIN Program, Western Governors University D184: Standards-Based Assessment Task 3: Analyzing Assessment Data May 23, 2023

2 Proficiency Scores Student 1 (1,2) 1.5 Student 9 (2,3) 2.1 Student 17 (1,4) 2.5 Student 2 (2,4) 2.6 Student 10 (1,4) 2.5 Student 18 (2,4) 2.6 Student 3 (1,4) 2.8 Student 11 (1,3) 1.3 Student 19 (1,5) 3.2 Student 4 (1,5) 3.2 Student 12 (2,5) 3.5 Student 20 (2,4) 3.0 Student 5 (1,3) 0.7 Student 13 (2,4) 3.0 Student 6 (2,4) 2.3 Student 14 (1,4) 2.7 Student 7 (1,5) 3.8 Student 15 (1,3 2.1 Student 8 (2,5) 3.6 Student 16 (2,3) 1.7 The summative scores in the above table were from formative assessments collected at the end of each unit. There were 8 assessments and their scores were averaged using the Marzano True Score calculator based on the average column ( Marzano True Score ). Disaggregated Data Subgroup 1 had an average score of 2.39 is scoring below grade level meaning they will require additional instructional help. Subgroup 2 had an average of 2.59 students are almost proficient and still will require support. Subgroup 3 had an average of 1.58 students are beginning to learn the content and will need additional support such as intervention. Subgroup 4 had an average of 2.66 students are right at grade level but still require help. Subgroup 5 had an average of 3.46 is on grade level. Pattern of Scores Student 1 : 1.5

4 content at the beginning and started to understand it at the end of the unit. At the unit, student was starting to make those connections. Student may need to be evaluated. Student 6: 2.3 This student started with a 0 on the first assessment but increased on the next 2 assessments with a score of 2. On the 4 th assessment, student scored above grade level. Assessments 5-8 student stayed on grade level. Student was familiar with certain parts to the content. Student 7: 3.8 This student scored a 3 on the first assessment and scored a 4 on the rest of the assessments. Student was knowledgeable to the lesson being taught. Student 8:3.6 This student scored a 3 on assessments 2-4 and maintained a 4 on assessments 4-8. Student was either on or above grade level and doesn’t need support. Student 9: 2.1 This student was very inconsistent with assessments scores. Student started off with scoring 2s on first 3 assessments and went down to 1. Student scored a 2 on the next two assessments. Student may need additional support. Student 10: 2.5 This student scored a 1 on the first assessment and steadily improved on the rest of the assessments. Students is retaining information being taught. Student will eventually be on grade level.

5 Student 11: 1.3 This student scored a 0 on the first assessment and slightly improved to a 2 on assessments 2-3, and went down to a 0 on assessment 4. On assessment 8, the student scored a 3. The student may have required additional support at the beginning of the lesson and they started to show understanding towards the end of the unit. The student needs to be evaluated for any delays. Student 12: 3.5 Student started on grade level scoring 3’s in the first half and scoring 4’s on the rest of the assessments. The student does not need support. Student 13: 3.0 Student scored a 2 on the first assessment and was on grade level or above on the rest of the assessments. The student does not need support. Student 14: 2.7 This student started off below grade level with a score of 2. At the end of the unit, the student scored a 4. The student required support throughout the unit and was able to be above grade level at the end. Student 15: 2.1 This student scored below grade level (2) on assessments 1-7. On the last assessment scored a 3. Student needs to be monitored closely and additional support is needed to get the student on grade level. Student 16: 1.7

7 Subgroup 1 has a wide range of scores, ranging from .7 to 3.8. Support should be given to all students at the beginning of the unit (assessments 1-3). Most students started below grade level. If all students are given support, an increase may be seen quicker and students that were already on grade level could be above grade level sooner. Subgroup 2, showed at the end of the unit students were on grade level or above. Student 16 finished the last assessment with a score of 2. This student definitely needs to be evaluated and does not fit with the other students within this particular group. Subgroup 3, all students within this group started below grade level, all except 2 were able to score on grade level at the end of the unit. Student 4 and Student 16 may need to be removed from this group. These two students ended with a score of 2, so there is information not being understood in a particular part of the unit or an underlying cause to delay. Subgroup 4, these students started below grade level but were on grade level or above by the end of the unit. Student 13 and Student 14 stayed on grade level or above for the majority of assessments given. Subgroup 5, students in this group were above grade level scoring a 4 on the last assessment. These students scored a 2 or above on the first assessment; these were very strong students from the start of the unit. These are also the students that needed little to no support at all.

8 References Marzano Growth Calculator . Empower Learning. (n.d). Retrieved May 23, 2023, from https://www.cbe.empowerlearning.net/marzano-calculator