Effective Participative Management: Analyzing Managerial Responses

Activity Six Shreyanshkumar Sonavale Department of MS Finance University of the Cumberlands BADM532: Organizational Behavior Dr. Christie Oliver October 8, 2023

Q1. What are the chances that Mr. Fixx's email will spur effective participative management at the company? Are the odds better or worse than fifty/fifty? The chances that Mr. Fixx's email will spur effective participative management at the company are somewhat uncertain. It is essential to consider the context and the manner in which Mr. Fixx communicated his intentions. While Mr. Fixx's enthusiasm for participative management is commendable, the effectiveness of his approach is questionable. The odds of success may be better than fifty/fifty if certain factors are taken into account:  Managerial Support : If the managers within the company are receptive to the idea of participative management and are willing to embrace the principles outlined in the seminar materials, the chances of success are higher. However, if there is resistance among the management team, the odds of success may decrease.  Employee Buy-In : The success of participative management relies heavily on employee buy-in. If employees are encouraged to participate in decision-making and feel that their input is valued, it can lead to increased commitment and productivity. However, if employees perceive this as a top-down mandate without genuine involvement, it may not be as effective.  Implementation Strategy : Mr. Fixx's email seems somewhat authoritarian and may not foster the collaborative spirit required for participative management. If he provides proper training, resources, and support for managers to transition to this new approach and if there is a clear plan for implementation, the odds of success improve.  Communication and Education : It's crucial for Mr. Fixx to communicate the benefits of participative management clearly and educate both managers and

employees about the principles and practices involved. Without a clear understanding of why this change is necessary, resistance is likely. In summary, the odds of success for effective participative management at the company depend on factors such as managerial support, employee buy-in, the implementation strategy, and the quality of communication and education provided. While the odds may be better than fifty/fifty with the right approach, it's essential to address these factors to increase the chances of success. Q2. How has each individual manager responded to the email? Is your response consistent with that of most group members, or do you find yourself taking a stance that's different, even if only slightly so? If you’ve taken a different stance, do you think it's worthwhile trying to convince the group to come around to your way of thinking? Why or why not? Each individual manager's response to Mr. Fixx's email may vary, but there are likely to be several common reactions within the group: 1. Enthusiastic Embrace : Some managers may fully embrace the idea of participative management, seeing it as an opportunity to enhance productivity and employee commitment. They may be eager to implement the principles outlined in the seminar materials. 2. Cautious Optimism : Other managers may be cautiously optimistic but may have reservations or questions about how to effectively implement participative management in their departments. They might want more guidance and support. 3. Skepticism and Resistance : Some managers may be skeptical or resistant to the idea, seeing it as a sudden mandate from Mr. Fixx without clear guidance. They may be

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

concerned about the practicality and potential challenges of implementing participative management. 4. Indifference : A portion of managers may be indifferent, awaiting further instructions or observing how their colleagues respond before taking action. If I find myself taking a stance different from the majority, even if only slightly, it could be worthwhile trying to convince the group to consider alternative perspectives. However, the approach to persuasion should be collaborative and based on constructive dialogue rather than confrontation. Here's why:  Diverse Perspectives : Diverse viewpoints can enrich the decision-making process. If there are legitimate concerns or suggestions for improvement regarding the implementation of participative management, it's valuable to share these perspectives for the benefit of the organization.  Better Decision-Making : Open discussions can lead to better decision-making. By encouraging dialogue and considering alternative viewpoints, the group may arrive at a more well-rounded and effective approach to participative management.  Enhanced Buy-In : If concerns are addressed, and alternative ideas are incorporated into the plan, it can enhance buy-in from managers and employees, increasing the chances of successful implementation. However, it's important to approach this with the intention of constructive contribution rather than resistance for its own sake. Ultimately, the goal should be to work together to implement participative management effectively. Q3. What is the group's opinion of Mr. Fixx's approach to implementing participative management at the company? If you don’t regard his approach as the best way of

implementing participative practices—or his email as the best means of introducing the subject—discuss some ways in which he could have improved his approach. The group's opinion of Mr. Fixx's approach to implementing participative management at the company is likely to be mixed. Some may appreciate his enthusiasm and commitment to improving management practices, while others may find fault with his approach. Here are some ways in which Mr. Fixx could have improved his approach: 1. Gradual Introduction : Rather than issuing a directive via email, Mr. Fixx could have considered a more gradual introduction of participative management. This might involve pilot programs in specific departments to test the approach and gather feedback before rolling it out company-wide. 2. Inclusive Communication : Mr. Fixx's email appears top-down and authoritarian. A more inclusive approach would involve seeking input and feedback from managers and employees before finalizing the plan. This would create a sense of ownership and involvement in the process. 3. Training and Support : Instead of simply providing seminar handouts, Mr. Fixx could have organized training sessions or workshops to ensure that managers fully understand the principles and practices of participative management. Ongoing support and resources would also be essential for successful implementation. 4. Clear Rationale : Mr. Fixx should have clearly communicated the rationale behind the shift to participative management. Why is it necessary, and what benefits will it bring to the organization and its employees? A compelling case can motivate individuals to embrace change. 5. Feedback Mechanisms : Establishing feedback mechanisms for managers and employees to express concerns, share ideas, and report on the progress of participative

management implementation would be vital. This would address any issues and make adjustments as needed. 6. Demonstrate Commitment : Mr. Fixx should lead by example and demonstrate his own commitment to participative management principles. Actions speak louder than words, and his behavior will set the tone for the organization. In conclusion, while Mr. Fixx's intention to introduce participative management is commendable, his approach could have been more inclusive, gradual, and supportive to increase the likelihood of successful implementation and acceptance by the management team and employees.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

References – 1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). Academic Press. 2. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. Wiley. 3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum. 4. Lawler, E. E., & Suttle, J. L. (1973). A causal-correlational analysis of the job satisfaction and performance relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 58(2), 172- 179. 5. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Prentice-Hall.

BADM 532_Assignment 6

Related Documents