Aviation Safety- Research Paper

docx

School

American Military University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

113

Subject

Management

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

Uploaded by ElderWolverinePerson870

1 The Need for Safety Programs in Complex Industries Making safety a top concern is still very important in complex, high-stakes fields like flight. Even though commercial flying has had an excellent safety record over the past few decades, the complexity of modern airplanes requires thorough safety management to identify and reduce risks carefully. Over the past 100 years, long-standing system safety methods and government have significantly impacted flight safety. Today, officials worldwide require planes and manufacturers to set up organized safety management systems that look at risks ahead of time. In addition to these organizational efforts, voluntary private reporting methods are essential because they allow the whole industry to learn and improve safety. The Bible commands people to "love their neighbor as themselves" and "do unto others as would have them do unto you." This fully supports a moral code that says each customer and worker should be cared for with the same level of diligence as oneself. This point of view entirely agrees with looking at past safety events to stop them from happening again, being open to finding risks, and having attitudes that put people before profits or meeting deadlines. In short, the Bible's teachings about seeing and treating others as naturally good perfectly align with aviation's goal to make travel more accessible in today's complicated world while constantly improving safety for all people on board and below every flight path. With this focus on human humanity at the heart of all planning and operations, plane travel should only get safer over the next ten years, no matter what new technologies or sizes come out. According to Gouws (2022), modern system safety is rooted in how the military used engineering methods to ensure that complicated weapons platforms didn't break down too often during World War II. Then, from the 1950s to the 1960s, commercial aerospace companies adopted and improved these dependability principles to make fail-safe commercial airplane

2 designs more reliable. But even though the size and complexity of flight kept growing from the late 1960s to the early 1980s, there were still some terrible crashes. A lot of research done after the fact showed that these complicated human-technology system crashes were mainly caused by mistakes made by people or poor management of crew resources, not just technical problems. This discovery led to the first Crew Resource Management training in the 1980s and ever- improving safety management rules considering more complete human factors. At the same time, forward-thinking officials set up systems for required private reports so the growing flight industry could share lessons learned from common and uncommon crashes. As commercial flight networks, operations speed, and aircraft technological sophistication rise year after year, these reporting partnerships and improvements in training and safety system designs have become increasingly important. This is especially true as the cognitive demands on flying staff and ground operators rise. Thankfully, consistent attempts to improve training, evaluate risks, change processes, make reports clear, and include human factors in safety systems have led to considerable improvements in flight safety for more than four decades. But constant monitoring and refusal to give up are needed to ensure that aviation's excellent safety record continues, even as the challenges ahead get more complicated. The Federal Flight Administration (FAA) in the United States sets and applies strict safety rules for the flight business. For example, the FAR 119 code says that all passenger air companies that the FAA approves must set up official Safety Management Systems (SMS) to look at flying risks in a planned way. In the same way, FAR 120 requires SMS for people who fly big planes that weigh more than 100,000 pounds. The FAA also started the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS), the Aviation Safety Action Program (ASAP), and the Mediterranean EXTENDED Debrief Approach (MEDA) to encourage people to make safety improvements on

3 their own. These private sites make it easier for pilots, controllers, mechanics, and other flight workers to talk openly about near-misses or mistakes without fear of punishment. This kind of openness lets airlines and the larger air transportation human-tech environment keep learning and improving based on data. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which is formally separate, also looks into accidents objectively and makes suggestions to stop them from happening again. The FAA and NTSB work together through required SMS programs and optional MEDA, ASRS, and ASAP reporting channels. This has made people more aware of risk, improved safety cultures, and standardized procedures. As a result, the risk of an airline accident in the US has dropped by over 50 times since the 1970s, even though air traffic has been growing. Still, constant monitoring is necessary because the number of people flying worldwide is higher than before the pandemic, and the infrastructure for passing vehicles and tracking is getting more complicated. Aviation is in a good situation to keep improving its safety performance, no matter how hard things get in the future, as long as it keeps its capabilities up to date, follows through on required and voluntary safety initiatives, and publishes its data (Clare & Kourousis, 2021). In the last few decades, flying has become safer thanks to the efforts of flight government groups and business players working together. In particular, the number of aircraft accidents has dropped sharply from more than 30 significant crashes per million takeoffs in the 1970s to less than two major accidents per million exits after 2009. This considerable growth is primarily due to the many flight safety programs required by officials and the volunteer reporting programs that make it possible for everyone in the industry to share precise data. These ongoing safety agreements make it possible to keep looking at accident and incident data and information gathered from employee reporting tools on the front lines. The results also make it possible to

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

4 improve teaching methods, produce tools that make people more valuable, make working processes easier to follow, and create safety-focused organizational attitudes across all areas of flight. Safety in flight is constantly being emphasized by lawmakers, producers, owners, bases, air traffic control, and people who travel. Maintaining this shared commitment to gradually improving safety skills and attitudes will become more critical as air transportation networks get more complicated. This goal must be backed up by strong ethics and the right resources so that future generations can trust the aircraft business to maintain the most significant safety performance. For Christians who work in flight, Mark 12:31's order to "love your neighbor as yourself" entirely fits with putting safety first. Christians think that all people are equal in God's eyes regarding worth and respect. This way of thinking says that people should care about the lives and well-being of others just as much as they care about their own. Aviation safety programs follow this neighbor-centered philosophy by carefully looking into past crashes to stop more people from dying. Safety programs also tell people to be honest and tell someone when they see something wrong or dangerous. If you're honest about your problems, they will keep improving instead of being hidden for fear of what might happen or to feel safe. Scripture supports this idea, showing that God wants honest hearts more than lip service or outward gifts (Psalm 51:16–17). Following the Bible's teaching of loving your friend leads to putting safety first, putting people ahead of convenience or profit, seeking humility, and incorporating moral honesty into reporting systems and fair safety practices across all flight areas. The religious view of the world is in line with safety ethics, which stress treating others with respect and caring for them as much as you care about yourself. To encourage this "loving neighbor" attitude, we must create processes and

5 teach ways of thinking that help people notice and quickly fix safety problems so that no one gets hurt. Biblical love forces people to speak out to keep others safe. To sum up, improving flight safety depends on constantly learning new things and being honest since planes and the networks that connect them are becoming more complicated. Industry leaders and governing bodies must strictly follow safety management practices to spot new dangers before they cause accidents quickly. Also, justice-based, anonymous reporting programs will be very helpful in getting field teams to be honest about risks they see or mistakes they make. This way, problems can be fixed quickly before they get worse. In all areas of flight, working to understand each employee's inherent worth and respect must come first. This will help everyone remember that safety is more important than getting things done on time or making money. Keeping this level of care and dedication, along with putting people before profits, as guide principles will help the airline industry improve safety over the next 100 years, no matter how big or complicated things get. With a commitment to safety-first values and a neighbor-focused attitude that takes care of every danger, air travel should improve over time.

6 References Clare, J., & Kourousis, K. I. (2021). Learning from incidents in aircraft maintenance and continuing airworthiness: regulation, practice, and gaps. Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, 93(2), 338-346. Gouws, J. J. (2022). Human and System Interface Consulting Inc. Scientia Militaria, 50(2), 1-36. New International Version (NIV) Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Ashgate Publication.

Your preview ends here

Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version

Access to all documents
Unlimited textbook solutions
24/7 expert homework help

Aviation Safety- Research Paper

Related Documents