comprehensive final project
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
St. John's University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
5003
Subject
Management
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
12
Uploaded by CommodoreLapwingPerson247
1
Comprehensive Final Project
Case Study: Can an Airline Cut "Turn Times" Without Adding Staff?
Nateisha Clement
Peirce College
MGT 210
Professor Carl Place
September 2023
2
I. Consider the following questions when identifying and diagnosing the problem:
1. Is there a difference between what is actually happening and what should be happening?
The existing state at RSA Ground differs significantly from what should occur there. For the previous year, the actual turnaround times for inspecting, cleaning, fueling, and stocking aircrafts have climbed from an average of 12 minutes to 20 minutes. This departure from the desired turnaround time has a detrimental impact on flight scheduling, client’s satisfaction, and profitability. The desired outcome is a quick and effective turnaround process that satisfies the airline's 10-12 minute target, guaranteeing seamless operations and satisfied customers at a reasonable cost.
2. How can you describe the deviation, as specifically as possible?
The primary issue is the noticeably longer turnaround times for aircraft maintenance at Rising Sun Airlines' subsidiary, RSA Ground. Over the past year, there has been a noticeable extension in turnaround times, increasing from an average of 12 minutes to 20.. This departure from the anticipated turnaround times is a serious problem, as it causes expensive flight schedule delays. Singamneni et al. (2019) assert that quick turnaround times are critical for aircraft manufacturing and maintenance processes. 3. What is/are the cause(s) of the deviation?
One possible cause is insufficient staffing. Longer turnaround times result from RSA Ground's attempt to manage higher demand and more frequent flights with the same number of staff. Another reason is the high attrition rates. Due to significant turnover rates, temporary and
3
part-time employees who are hired to cover gaps, find the work excessively demanding and stressful. Less experienced workers like Toshi, could cause slower turnaround times. Due to inefficient cleaning and service procedures, teams may need more time to work fast.
4. What specific goals should be met?
●
Turnaround
times should be shortened from the present 20 minutes to 12 minutes, or even
better, 10 minutes.
●
Enhance staff retention to lessen the demand for ongoing training and hiring.
●
Sustain and enhance passenger satisfaction and
service quality.
5. Which of these goals are critical to the success of the decision?
Enhancing employee retention should be the main objective since it is crucial for a consistent and successful staff. Any company's long-term health and success depend on its ability
to retain its workforce (Bhutada & Sanmath, 2018). This objective is vital to the company's performance since maintaining a steady staff helps ensure client satisfaction, maintain regular and effective turnaround times, and reduce operational disruptions. 6. Are there any ethical considerations?
Fair compensation and working circumstances should be maintained. It is significant to consider the working conditions for employees, especially temporary and part-time workers, to make sure they are not unnecessarily stressed and exploited.. As stated by Bright et al. (2019), it is a universal idea that people should be valued for who they are, not just for what they can do or how they can assist others' progress.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
7. Develop a diagram or flowchart to graphically illustrate the problem
Increased demand for air travel
High Attrition Rates
Delays in Flight Schedules
Inefficient Cleaning and Servicing Processes
Insufficient Staffing
Fuller flights
Decreased Customer Satisfaction and Profitability
5
Extended Turn Times
8. Identify all of the stakeholders this problem impacts
Rising Sun Airlines, RSA Ground staff, passengers, investors, stockholders, and the human resources and recruitment departments are among the parties affected by this issue.
II. Generate Alternative Solutions 1.
Consider ready-made solutions or innovative solutions.
When tackling the issue of prolonged turnaround times at RSA Ground, it is critical to consider both pre-made and creative solutions. The comprehensive turnaround recovery solutions
encompass stand reallocation, swift de/boarding initiatives (such as remote stand assignment for expediting passenger movement), and rapid turnaround strategies. This entails bolstering staffing
levels to enhance cleaning, catering, and loading processes while facilitating parallel fueling and boarding, and fortified by fire brigade fuel protection measures. An inventive strategy similar to Nobuo's, is actively encouraging staff members to share their concepts and "tricks" to increase productivity. According to Opland et al. (2020), employee-driven innovation is a novel type of direct involvement wherein staff members take the initiative to produce, develop, and put their ideas into action. This encourages a culture of ongoing development and empowerment, by giving staff members the authority to take responsibility for their work procedures
.
1.
Identify 3 possible alternatives to address the problem.
The problems with RSA turnaround times can be addressed in a few ways.. According to Hiemstra-Van Mastrigt et al. (2019), disruptions during the boarding process significantly
6
contribute to delays and extended turnaround times, making this a significant issue for airlines. Passengers are ill-prepared for the boarding process; there is insufficient storage space, and the audio announcements lack emphasis and clarity. Hiemstra-Van Mastrigt et al. (2019) propose innovative strategies for enhancing passenger experience, including harnessing light for communication, implementing pre-flight hand luggage scanning apps, and using gate area projections to facilitate boarding preparations. Forming a task force or group to enhance RSA Ground's training program for temporary employees. The task force would oversee the creating thorough training curricula, resources, and materials. According to Adrienne et al. (2020), when operations resume, a staff deficit in skills and numbers may worsen if they are trained to operate a certain type of aircraft, such as cabin crew.
RSA Ground can identify a redesign of a collaborative process by creating cross-
functional teams with employees from different departments. Schultz (2018) asserts that enhanced airport operations via Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) are a prerequisite. Allowing all stakeholders to share operational milestones online allows the A-CDM idea to seek information-based decision management (Schultz, 2018). Shared awareness is expected to lead to improved procedures and a more equitable allocation of local and network resources.
2.
Conduct research on other companies and the alternatives they implemented to address the problem.
Efforts to save time and money are always led by innovation. Delta Airlines optimized its
aircraft turnaround process by adjusting the push angle from 90 to 45 degrees, resulting in
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
7
efficient use of time and enhanced operational efficiency (IATA, 2021). Innovation is frequently only the application of clever ideas or novel approaches to problems rather than developing high-
tech products.
Instead of using a hub and spoke system, which requires passengers to change modes of transportation in order to reach their destination, Southwest Airlines employs an efficient point-
to-point travel system that seamlessly transports passengers to their final destinations, bypassing congestion and optimizing travel convenience (Dias, 2020). By lowering delays and turnaround times and lowering the cost of hangar spots at large hubs, this method enabled the firm to operate
short-haul flights profitably. It is stated by Pickering (2018) that Emirates' operational team in Dubai relies on Hub Monitor, which is an in-house tool crafted by the airline, to seamlessly exchange and meticulously track real-time data concerning the myriad tasks involved in preparing aircraft for takeoff. This innovative technology serves as a stalwart guardian against delays, bolstering punctuality through its proactive alerting system and vigilant monitoring, ultimately contributing to an elevated passenger experience.
III. Evaluate the Alternatives
1. Identifying the Impact on Operational, Personnel, and Physical Plant Costs
Alternative 1 (Employee-driven innovation):
1)
Operational Costs
: Initial investment in platforms or tools to capture employee ideas
might be needed. As employees identify inefficiencies and suggest improvements,
operational costs may decrease in the long run (Sullivan, 2017).
2)
Personnel Costs
: While there may be a short-term increase due to training or incentive
programs for innovative ideas, increased efficiency can lead to better resource allocation,
potentially balancing out costs in the long term.
3)
Physical Plant Costs
: Minimal impact is expected, but costs might be associated with
any physical changes employees suggest to improve operations.
Cost Type
Initial Cost
Ongoing Cost
Operational
Platforms or tools to capture
employee ideas
Maintenance of platforms or
tools, employee training on
how to use them, and
8
implementation of employee-
suggested improvements
Personnel
Training and incentives for
innovative ideas
Ongoing employee training
on innovation and problem-
solving
Physical Plant
Any
physical
changes
suggested by employees to
improve operations
Maintenance of any new
physical changes
Table 1: Initial and Ongoing Costs of Employee-Driven Innovation
Alternative 2 (Optimized aircraft turnaround process like Delta Airlines):
1)
Operational Costs
: There will be an initial outlay for retraining staff and potentially for
any new equipment. However, planes can make more trips if turnaround time is reduced,
improving revenue.
2)
Personnel Costs
: Staff might require training to adapt to the new processes, adding to
short-term personnel costs.
3)
Physical Plant Costs
: Implementing a new push angle system might require changes to
the airport docking infrastructure, incurring additional costs.
Alternative 3 (Point-to-point travel system like Southwest Airlines):
1)
Operational Costs
: Rerouting flights and modifying ticketing systems could be
significant initially. Over time, operational costs might be reduced due to increased
efficiency.
2)
Personnel Costs
: Significant training would be required to familiarize staff with the new
system.
3)
Physical Plant Costs
: This change might need alterations in gate assignments and flight
pathways, leading to higher costs.
2. Impact on Organizational Structure, Culture, Morale, and Other Areas
1)
Alternative 1
: By emphasizing the value of each employee's input, the organizational
culture shifts towards collaboration and innovation. Morale may improve as employees
feel their contributions are valued.
2)
Alternative 2
: The culture might shift towards one that values efficiency and precision.
The new process can also provide a more transparent structure for ground staff,
potentially boosting morale.
3)
Alternative 3
: This could represent a significant shift, possibly requiring restructuring.
While there might be initial resistance, if the system proves efficient, it can lead to
improved morale and a culture of adaptability.
3. Departments Needed for Evaluation
For all alternatives, it would be crucial to involve:
1)
Finance
: To assess cost implications and potential ROI.
2)
Operations
: To evaluate feasibility and operational impact.
3)
Human Resources
: To gauge employee morale, potential training needs, and feedback
mechanisms.
4)
Strategic Planning
: To ensure the alternative aligns with the company's long-term goals.
4. Organizing for Success
To successfully implement any of the alternatives, it is crucial to:
1)
Engage Stakeholders
: Keep all relevant departments and employees informed and
involved (Watt, 2014).
9
2)
Pilot the Initiative
: Before a full rollout, test the chosen alternative on a smaller scale to
identify potential challenges.
3)
Gather Feedback
: Regularly solicit feedback to make necessary adjustments.
IV. Make a Choice
After a comprehensive evaluation of the alternatives, a decision must be made. This
choice should align with the company's long-term goals, available resources, and the potential
for sustainable improvements.
1. Selection and Rationale
Alternative 1: Employee-driven innovation
1)
Why Chosen
: This approach aligns with the ethos of empowering employees and
fostering a culture of continuous improvement. It also requires the least disruption to
current operations.
2)
Rationale
: Engaging employees can lead to grassroots solutions tailored to the unique
challenges of RSA Ground. When employees feel heard and valued, they are more likely
to contribute proactively to problem-solving (Bright et al., 2019). Furthermore, frontline
workers possess intimate knowledge of the day-to-day challenges, making them well-
placed to suggest practical solutions.
2. Impact on Stakeholders
1)
Employees
: By prioritizing their input, employees feel more engaged and empowered.
This can increase job satisfaction and lower turnover rates (Ganesh, 2023).
2)
Customers
: A more efficient turnaround process can reduce flight delays, improving the
overall customer experience.
3)
Management
: An empowered workforce can lead to smoother operations and reduced
problem-solving overhead, allowing management to focus on strategic growth.
4)
Investors and Shareholders
: Improved operations can enhance profitability, making the
company a more attractive investment.
3. Costs of Implementation
1)
Initial Costs
: Setting up platforms for feedback, organizing brainstorming sessions, and
training sessions to encourage innovation.
2)
Ongoing Costs
: Monitoring the implemented suggestions, periodic training, and
potential rewards or incentives for outstanding innovations.
3)
Potential Savings
: Improved efficiency can lead to cost savings in the long run. Reduced
flight delays can also enhance brand reputation, potentially driving more sales.
4. Impact on the Company's Financial Performance, Culture, or Morale
1)
Financial Performance
: While initial costs might be incurred in setting up the system
and incentivizing innovation, the long-term benefits of operational efficiency can lead to
financial gains (Maher & Andersson, 2019).
2)
Company Culture
: This choice fosters collaboration, innovation, and mutual respect. It
underscores the company's belief in its employees' expertise and insights.
3)
Morale
: Employee morale is likely to get a significant boost. When staff feel their
contributions are acknowledged and have a tangible impact, their connection to their job
and the company strengthens.
5. Planning and Decision Making
The following steps are crucial for successful implementation drawing from Chapter 5:
1)
Setting Clear Objectives
: Understand and communicate the end goals of this initiative.
2)
Engaging Stakeholders
: Involve relevant departments in decision-making to ensure
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
10
alignment and smooth implementation.
3)
Monitoring and Feedback
: Set up mechanisms to monitor the progress of implemented
solutions and gather feedback for continuous improvement (Sopact, 2021).
4)
Review and Iteration
: Periodically review the effectiveness of implemented solutions.
Make necessary adjustments based on feedback and changing circumstances.
11
References
Adrienne, N., Budd, L., & Ison, S. (2020). Grounded aircraft: An airfield operations perspective of the challenges of resuming flights post COVID.
Journal of Air Transport Management
,
89
, 101921.
Bernstein, E., & Buell, R. (2016). Case Study: Can an Airline Cut “Turn Times” Without Adding Staff? Harvard Business Review Digital Articles
, 2–8. Bhutada, N., & Sanmath, S. (2018). Analysis of employee retention strategies and factors: a case study of IT sector. Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research
. Bright, D. S., Cortes, A.H., Hartmann, E., Praveen Parboteeah, K. … & O’Rourke, J. (2019).
Principles of management
. OpenStax College.
Dias, R. S. (2020).
Southwest airlines Co.: consistency for the future
(Doctoral dissertation).
Evler, J., Lindner, M., Fricke, H., & Schultz, M. (2022). Integration of turnaround and aircraft recovery to mitigate delay propagation in airline networks.
Computers & Operations Research
,
138
, 105602.
Hiemstra-Van Mastrigt, S., Ottens, R., & Vink, P. (2019). Identifying bottlenecks and designing ideas and solutions for improving aircraft passengers’ experience during boarding and disembarking.
Applied Ergonomics
,
77
, 16-21.
IATA. (2021). Top ways to safely improve the efficiency of aircraft turnaround with standardized
procedures. https://www.iata.org/en/publications/newsletters/iata-knowledge-
hub/improve-efficiency-aircraft-turnaround/
Opland, L. E., Pappas, I. O., Engesmo, J., & Jaccheri, L. (2022). Employee-driven digital
12
innovation: A systematic review and a research agenda.
Journal of Business Research
,
143
, 255-271.
Pickering, K. (2018). Emirates develops application to reduce aircraft turnaround delays at Dubai
International Airport. Passenger Terminal Today. https://www.passengerterminaltoday.com/news/technology/emirates-develops-
application-to-reduce-aircraft-turnaround-delays-at-dubai-international-airport.html
Singamneni, S., Yifan, L. V., Hewitt, A., Chalk, R., Thomas, W., & Jordison, D. (2019). Additive manufacturing for the aircraft industry: a review.
J. Aeronaut. Aerosp. Eng
,
8
(1), 351-
371.
Schultz, M. (2018). Fast aircraft turnaround enabled by reliable passenger boarding.
Aerospace
,
5
(1), 8.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Recommended textbooks for you
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Recommended textbooks for you
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Practical Management Science
Operations Management
ISBN:9781337406659
Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.
Publisher:Cengage,
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning