Phi 237 - Practice Exam 3 Fall 2023 McMahan, Dworkin, Veatch, Velleman, Sandel Answers
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University at Buffalo *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
237
Subject
Law
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by HighnessSparrow3988
Actual
Exam #3 Fall 2022 – Death, Organ Transplants,
Disability
McMahan on Death
1P. The criterion of death provides:
a. the meaning of death
b. bedside tests for death
c. the symptoms for death
D
. necessary and sufficient conditions for death
True 2P
. The Dead Donor Rule states that vital organs should not be taken
from the living as that will kill the donor.
False 3P
Assuming that the Dead Donor Rule is kept in place, more viable
organs for transplant will be made available with the whole brain criterion
than the upper brain criterion.
True 4P.
Advocates of
abandoning the Dead Donor Rule do so because they
believe the permanently unconscious were harmed by whatever caused
their mindlessness and so death is not a further harm
False 5P
McMahan believes that the word ‘death’ is univocal.
False 6P
. McMahan believes that Terry Schiavo’s animal (organism) died
with the onset of a persistent vegetative state but her person continued to
live for years
Truth 7P
. The traditional criterion was the circulatory/respiratory criterion
but it has been replaced by the whole brain death criterion in recent
decades.
True 8P.
McMahan believes that Shewmon has shown that the functioning
of the brain is not essential to the life of the human animal.
True 9P
. McMahan believes that rare cases of conjoined twins (e.g.
Hensels) involve two persons who are distinct parts of the same human
animal
10P. McMahan believes that the upper brain transplant thought
experiment indicates that:
a. human organisms and human persons are identical
B
. human persons cannot be identical to human organisms
c. human organisms are parts of human persons
d. human persons can have divided minds.
Veatch and Pitt on Presumed Consent
11P. An “opting out” system like
Presumed Consent:
1
A.
assumes people want to donate their organs unless they take measures
to retain them
b. renders taking one’s organs to the grave the default position
c. introduces a double veto that block organ donation
d. allows doctors to assume that incompetent patients want to
receive
organ
transplants.
12P
.
Veatch and Pitt
compare
presumed consent
to
presumed
treatment
and judge
a. both to be justified
b. both to be unjustified
C.
the former to be objectionable because it violates people’s wishes far
more often than the latter.
d. both to be equally good at minimizing the violations of the bodily integrity
of those who are no longer competent
13P. Veatch and Pitt believe that
Presumed Consent
A
. will too frequently take organs from people who didn’t register their
opposition to donate
b. will increase solidarity because it communicates a moral responsibility to
our fellow citizens
c. will respect autonomy for no one is forced to give up their organs
d. is a better policy than mandated choice.
False 14P
. Veatch and Pitt want to change the current US organ policy
from one of
presumed
consent
to one which people must
opt in
to donate
her organs
True 15P
Veatch and Pitt believe that
opting in
policies will do a better job
than
presumed consent
policies in guaranteeing that organs are only taken
from those who want to donate
True 16P
Defenders of
Presumed Consent
claim that it will more often
respect the wishes of the deceased regarding the fate of their organs than
will an
opting in
policy.
True 17P
. The Double Veto policy would allow the wishes of the deceased
to donate to be overridden by their families’ preferences.
True 18P
.
Presumed Consent
differs in principle from
Routine Salvage
policies
for only the former assumes that the person who didn’t opt out was
in favor of donating organs
2
True 19P
An opponent of presumed consent may claim that violating
someone’s bodily integrity and taking organs against their wishes is worse
than not taking organs when they wanted to donate
True 20P
. If organ conscription is analogous in the morally relevant way to
mandatory autopsies then consistency demands that they both be banned or
both be permitted
Gerald Dworkin on Organ Sales
21P. Dworkin advocates a market in organs because:
a. it is most effective to distribute organs to those willing to pay the most
for them
b. it is immoral for patients to take their organs with them to the grave
when others could use them
c. people no longer own their body after death when their property is
transferred to their heirs.
D
. it allows persons to exercise sovereignty over their body and increase
their well-being
22P Dworkin’s response to the claim organ sales by the poor aren’t
voluntarily is that:
a. poverty need not prevent a sale from being voluntary
b. it would mean the poor couldn’t contract to be employed in dangerous
jobs like the army
c. prohibiting such sales would be paternalistic in the extreme.
D.
all of the above
False 23P.
Dworkin is opposed to any regulation of the market price in both
the acquisition and distribution of organs.
False 24P.
Dworkin claims that one’s dignity is diminished if one’s body
parts are commodified
True 25P
. Dworkin believes that there are more objections to organ sales
from the living than the dead, so if he can successfully defend the former
then his defense will work for the latter.
Barnes on Disability
26P. An advocate of the mere-difference view of disability like Liz
Barnes would view the problems confronting the disabled to be
similar to those of
:
a. blacks in a racist society
b. gay people in a homophobic society
c. women in a sexist society
3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
D
. all of the above
27P. The mere-difference view of disability maintains that the
disabled:
A
. would tend to have the same level of well-being as the non-disabled if it
were not for ableism
b. would tend to have less well-being than the able-bodied even in the
absence of ableism
c. will die sooner than the able-bodied
d. should be cured whether they want to be or not
28P. The bad-difference view of disability maintains that the
disabled:
a. would have the same level of well-being as the non-disabled if it was not
for ableism
B
. will tend to have less well-being than the able-bodied even in the absence
of ableism
c. will flourish as much as the able-bodied if society makes efforts at
improving accessibility
d. should be cured whether they want to be or not
True 29P
. Barnes argues that transition or adaptation costs provide a
reason not to impose disabilities on adults that is independent of whether
disabilities are mere or bad differences
True 30P
Barnes’ paper is a response to the objection that if disability is a
mere difference then that entails it is permissible to cause someone to be
disabled and it is impermissible to cure the disabled
True 31P
. Barnes believes that there are non-interference principles which
block the entailment from the mere difference account of disability to the
permissibility of inducing a disability in a child.
False 32P
. Barnes believes that parents should not interfere in their
children’s lives when those interferences impact their identity or sense of
self.
True 33P.
Barnes believes that most people are opposed to imposing
disabilities upon others because they hold a bad-difference view of disability
4