Soci Part B
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
University of British Columbia *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
102
Subject
Law
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by SargentElementLyrebird19
Prisha Jain
51649077
1.
Drawing on Durkheim's study of suicide outline how you would explore the mental
health of UBC students.
Durkheim collected empirical evidence of suicide rates across factors such as gender, race, age
etc as contrbuting social facts. Since he used inductive reasoning, an implementation of his
theory could involve a survey amongst UBC students about their mental health and the factors
that influence it in their experience. Then the data gathered would be assessed based on gender
and race. Age may not be a suitable variable as most UBC students would fall under a similar
age group. Through these classifications, one can use the data to decipher the social facts that are
affecting the students. Generally males have higher suicide rates thus this hypothesis could be
tested based on male UBC students’ mental health issues and their susceptibilty to self
harm/suicide. Similarly, racial discrimination is a leading cause of suicide for minority race
groups, the data collected can provide evidence for or against this notion. Based on which,
conclusions can be made and the UBC Student Assistant Program (SAP) can be informed of the
same.
2.
Outline how Public Sociology aligns with Goal 2 of UBC's Indigenous Strategic Plan.
Public sociology is rooted in making individuals in a society into engaged citizens to benefit
society as a whole. Zygmunt Bauman, a sociologist shared his optimistic views about humans
working towards a fair society by eliminating social stratification. In the context of goal 2 of
UBC’s Indigenous Strategic Plan, opening public dialogue aligns with public sociology by
helping facilitate citizenship in those who attend. It provides a means of spreading awareness
about truth and reconciliation and appealing to the public about the injustices faced by the
Prisha Jain
51649077
Indigenous community. This would in turn bring us one step closer to a fairer society through the
social interaction between the Indigenous people and other communities. Additionally, a public
dialogue would also contribute to the nullifying overt social groups that exist in our society as it
will allow all individuals to openly share their views and experiences without having to conform
into a societal bubble, granting them the freedom to ask questions and gain more knowledge
about the cultural and history of Indigenous people, as well as learn about the proper
terminologies used by their people.
3.
The McDonaldization of Education? Discuss drawing on your own experience of
education.
McDonaldization refers to the cultural homogeneity of big companies impacting smaller ones.
Georg Ritzer theorized that McDonald’s ration system is made up of key elements such as
“efficiency, calculability, predictability and control” (Nagle, 290). Drawing from my experience,
my school adopted the rigid system of the IB curriculum with set exam components and course
material. The educators efficiently allotted parts of the course work across the year, ensuring its
completion. With that, we followed strict deadlines to submit projects and a set time table to
maintain order and structure. With that, the staff followed a hierarchical system starting from the
curriculum coordinators down to the teachers. Each staff member had specific responsibilities
which were reflected in their interaction with the students. As a way of preserving the uniformity
of our education, a class average was taken at the end of each year to be compared to the next
batch and to set a standard that would be followed by all students, hence showcasing the
predictability of our school’s system.
Prisha Jain
51649077
4.
Outline how the experience of chronic illness may differ according to gender.
Chronic illness renders an individual as an unproductive member of society thus illustrating the
concept of a sick role. The sick role presents the individual with certain privileges and
obligations that they abide by in society. Though the basis of features remains the same, factors
such as gender, change the implication of the sick role. In society, there are gender roles in a
patriarchal system where women are given the duty of a ‘caretaker’ and men, the ‘breadwinner’.
If a man has a chronic illness, he would be deemed unproductive in terms of socio-economic
stability given his inability to work and earn money. On the contrary, chronic illness would make
a woman unproductive at home, resulting in instability in the household. Though, over the years,
we have advanced as a society and social order has become more complex, where women work
alongside men, in situations like those a chronic illness would impact them similarly.
Unfortunately, the expectation from men to work is far greater than women, due to which men
feel a greater obligation to restore their health and resume working.
5.
Producing Inequality: compare schooling in Canada and South Africa.
The educational systems in Canada differ greatly on the basis of the fundamental economy of the
two countries where Canada is a developed country, South Africa is a developing country.
Although both nations still suffer from inequalities in their educational system. The leading
inequality in South Africa is a lack of quality and funding in education. Due to under qualified
staff and poor infrastructure, a performance gap has been created between rich and poor students.
Similarly, Canadian schooling promotes such social groups by rewarding students from high
income families, more promising job opportunities. Along with that, they perpetuate institutional
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Prisha Jain
51649077
racism against Aboriginal people through the erasure of their cultural history in Canada. In turn,
cultural inequalities are integrated in the schooling system. On the contrary, South Africa has
introduced the study of Xhosa language instruction and Indigenous morals like Ubuntu, hence
eliminating cultural inequalities like those in Canada.
Mini-Essay:
Construct a discussion with conclusion on either the Podcast or the Article.
In this podcast episode titled ‘how much do you make?’, the hosts start a dialogue about the
innate inappropriateness of this question in the workplace. They reflect upon the stigmatisation
of wage transparency about which three individuals discuss the social facts; gender and race.
The first speaker has a gendered discussion about the wage discrepancies between men and
women. Here, she correlates men’s boastful attitude towards sharing what they make to the fact
that women get paid 25% less than men, a gender inequality that reveals the hardships women
face in a patriarchal world. Additionally, their discomfort with transparency can also be
attributed to gender roles playing a part in a structural functionalist society (Nagle, 205). This
may also explain why there hasn’t been much of a change in the wage gaps because destabilizing
the very foundation of a society can be quite complex. However, in an optimistic sense, the third
speaker preached for wage transparency as a progressive step in society. He explained that this
may normalise this supposed taboo. With that, it may also incentivise everyone in the workplace
to speak up about wage disparities through unions. Hence, making women more comfortable in
making positive societal changes that would garner them equally as valuable as men.
Furthermore, the second speaker reviewed the racialisation in the creative industry. As a queer
Prisha Jain
51649077
black woman, she talked about the marginalisation of literature produced by people of colour.
Due to the cultural homogeneity (Nagle, 286) of most books published with caucasian
characters, sales of books written from other racial perspectives are cast aside. In addition, the
speaker illustrates that for a caucasian author, a book that didn’t sell is just that, but for a person
of colour, a book that didn’t sell becomes a representation of their entire culture, thus
corroborating the hesitation behind sharing the number of sales and the profit or loss generated
by them.
In conclusion, the podcast touched upon key factors affecting the reluctance in answering the
“how much do you make?” question such as gender and race. The first speaker draws from her
experience as an underpaid and undervalued woman in the workplace who doesn’t feel
compelled to share her income status in the presence of men who have higher incomes despite
doing the same work. Similarly, the second speaker illuminates the hosts about the institutional
racism in the publishing industry and how little recognition people of colour get, in terms of their
economic gain from their work. As a contrast, the last speaker gospelizes the normalisation of
wage transparency. He states that this would greatly benefit minority social groups by spreading
awareness about income gaps.
Bibliography
John Nagle. “Introducing Sociology: A Graphic Guide”.
Inappropriate Questions - Should I ask my co-worker “How much do you make?”