ch10
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Syracuse University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
304
Subject
Law
Date
Jan 9, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
11
Uploaded by UltraAlligatorMaster1003
Chapter 10-From Arrest and Bail Through Arraignment
learning objectives
1.
LO1 Define the two methods of estimating the amount of crime in the United States.
2.
LO2 Discuss how arrests made by the police impact the criminal court process.
3.
LO3 List the four ways that criminals are formally charged in court and the major actors in each of these important documents.
4.
LO4 List the four most common ways that defendants secure pretrial release.
5.
LO5 Compare and contrast “law on the books” and “law in action” approaches to bail setting, including the overall effects of the bail system on criminal defendants and their cases.
6.
LO6 Explain the role bail agents play in the criminal justice system.
7.
LO7 Contrast how the “law on the books” approach to criminal justice and the “law in action” perspective offer contrasting views of the preliminary hearing.
8.
LO8 Explain why some jurisdictions use grand juries extensively and others do not.
9.
LO9 Delineate the three major reasons for case attrition.
10. LO10 Describe the four layers of the criminal justice wedding cake.
crime
60s national increase in crime o
80s crime rate plateau
o
90s starts to decrease
UCR
uniform crime reporting o
fbi program
crime measure based off voluntary reporting from policing agencies
divides criminal offenses into o
type i: murder/nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rapes, arson, etc
o
type ii: simple assault, embezzlement, fraud, etc
type i crimes referred to as ‘index crimes’ o
murder and nonnegligent manslaughter, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault,
burglary, larceny/theft, motor vehicle theft, arson
NIBRS
national incident base reporting system
incident, not summary based (UCR)
states have been required to switch to the NIBRS system from the UCR program
data gathered from incidents under nibrs o
location of the crime
o
whether the crime was completed or attempted
→ UCR did not differentiate
o
type of weapon used if applicable
o
type and value of property damaged/stolen
o
personal characteristics of offender and victim
hierarchy rule: multiple crimes committed o
ucr reports the more serious crime
o
nibrs reports all crimes committed
problems with crime measurement
ucr and nibrs both based only on crimes made known to law enforcement
~50% violent crimes, ~67% property crimes not reported to police
reasons crimes may not be reported o
the issue at hand is dealt with in another way: ex) reporting incidents to other authorities (principals, security officers)
o
victims feel that the incident was not important enough to report
o
victims feel that the police would/could not help
o
victims fear reprisal from offender
o
victim does not want to get the offender in trouble
arrest
formal, technical arrest: taking the person into custody
broader sense: seizure of a person significant enough to constitute a formal arrest
taking a person into police custody under suspicion that they committed a crime
standard of proof: “probable cause”
quality of arrests
only 20% of all crimes are reported
physical (tangible) evidence
witnesses o
cooperation with respect to the witnesses’ constitutional rights
insufficient evidence o
police may improperly seize evidence
o
incomplete cases (ex: missing persons)
initial appearance
gerstein v pugh
o
scotus rules that a law enforcement officer’s “on-the-scene assessment of probable cause provides legal justification for arresting a person suspected of crime, and for a brief period of detention to take the administrative steps incident to arrest”
o
4th amendment prerequisite of probable cause prior to arrest
reasons for requiring an initial appearance w/o unnecessary delay o
to verify the person arrested is the one in the complaint
o
to advise accused of charges
o
to advise the accused of their rights
o
to protect the arrested from being abandoned in jails
o
to prevent secret and extended interrogation of arrested persons
o
to give the arrested an opportunity to secure release on bail
o
to give the arrested an opportunity for speedily conducted proceedings on minor charges
o
to obtain a prompt, neutral “judicial determination of probable cause as a prerequisite to extended restraint of liberty following arrest.”
usually occurs in local courts
attorney bail
order of protection
scotus expects initial appearance to occur within 48 hours of arrest without warrant
initial appearance not mandated if the grand jury has already returned an indictment o
some states require initial appearances for all arrests made
not all states provide for a judicial determination of probable cause at the initial appearance before the magistrate
random information o
most misdemeanor defendants enter a guilty plea (~70%)
o
initial appearances don’t last long like 5 min
o
2/3 defendants appear without counsel
charging
begins with the filing of a formal written accusation→ charging document o
legitimate charing document: date of offense, location, description of the accused
o
all essential elements (corpus delicti) of the crime must be specified
charging documents satisfy the 6th amendment provision that a defendant should be given information to prepare a defense
four types of charging documents
complaint, information, arrest warrant, indictment
use depends on severity of offense, state law, local customs
complaint must be supported by oath or affirmation of victim/arresting officer o
most popularly used in misdemeanor offenses/city ordinance violations
information is like the same thing as a complain except it is signed by the prosecutor o
used for initiating felony charges pending grand jury action
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
arrest warrants are issued by a judicial officer o
typically by a lower-court judge
o
warrants an be issued prior to arrest, but officers usually apply for a warrant post-
arrest
o
some states require prosecutor approval
courts and controversy: charging decisions
“Police department sometimes object when prosecutors set high standards for charging because they see case rejections as an implicit criticism of the arresting officer for making a ‘wrong’ arrest.”
police can have influence over election consequences (like DAs)
bail
a guarantee that the accused will return to court in exchange for their temporary freedom
amount of money paid as a condition of pre-trial release to ensure defendant will appear in court as required
prosecutor requests, defense responds, judges sets
forms of bail o
cash bond
o
property bond (typically twice the cash bond amount)
o
release on recognizance ROR → no collateral (promise the judge you will show up in court)
bail bondsman or bail agent
setting bail o
uncertainty: made early in case with sometimes inadequate and inaccurate information
o
risk: that defendant won’t flee or commit another crime while after released on bail
o
“quiet” consideration: jail overcrowding
bail risk o
is the defendant a flight risk?
o
ties to community
o
prior criminal record?
o
seriousness of the offense
o
strength of the case
law on the books v law in action
8th amendment does not specifically provide that all citizens are guaranteed the right to bail o
recognized under common law
bail procedure: (varies by jurisdiction and severity) o
minor offenses can just post bail at a police station
o
fixed bail schedule (emergency bail schedule): specifies an exact amount for each offense
bail can be set during an initial appearance, preliminary hearing, separate bail hearing
preventive detention o
holding suspects without bail if the crime is severe enough
risks that preventive detention is intended to mitigate o
there is a serious risk that the person will flee
o
the person may obstruct justice or threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror
o
the offense is one of violence or one punishable by life imprisonment or death
8th amendment only protects from excessive bail o
rare that the courts find a trial judge’s bail amount is excessive
o
generally speaking, trial court judges have ultimate discretion over bail
bail determining factors o
risk of flight and other nonappearance
o
risk to self and others
o
situational justice
due process model v crime control model
due process model: defendant is innocent until proven guilty, therefore should not remain in jail while awaiting trial
crime control model: society and the community should be protected against criminals who may continue to commit crimes while out awaiting trial
bail agents and bounty hunters
preliminary hearing
seldom used to short and routine to mini trial
probable cause/reasonable cause that a crime was committed and that defendant committed it
screening device to “filter out the shitty cases” (prof Trunfio) o
is there enough evidence to proceed
open to the public o
high risk of witness intimidation
grand jury
secret proceedings o
not meant to protect the prosecution
o
secrecy is meant to protect the jurors
size varies (6-23)
o
people from the community
majority vote
subpoena power
“shield & sword”
true bill v no bill
indictment
5th amendment right: right for a grand jury o
“no person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury.”
o
“otherwise infamous crime” interpreted as a felony
fifth amendment provision only applies to federal prosecutions o
hurtado v california
o
states can choose between using an indictment or an information
size of grand juries 5-23 o
usually selected randomly
o
→ “In a handful of states, however, judges, county boards, jury commissioners, or
sheriffs are allowed to exercise discretion in choosing who will serve on the grand
jury.”
law on the books: shield and sword
shield refers to protections provided by grand juries
sword refers to investigatory powers of a grand jury
true bill: indictment → grand jury finds charges to be true/valid o
no true bill: opposite
secrecy: protects those under scrutiny from adverse publicity
indictments are returned by a plurality vote o
1/2 → 2/3 votes sufficient for indictment in most states
differences between trial and grand juries: o
trial juries can only convict if the jury is unanimous/nearly unanimous
o
witnesses before grand jury have no right to counsel, defendants are entitled to representation throughout prosecution
o
suspects do not have the right to protest innocence before grand jury
grand juries have the authority to grant immunity from prosecution o
pleading the fifth
1893: statute passed by congress permitting granting of transactional immunity o
witnesses’ testimony in exchange for immunity from prosecution for crimes admitted
o
→ “turning state’s evidence”
organized crime control act of 1970 aka use immunity o
government can’t use a witness’s grand jury testimony to prosecute the witness
o
→ exception: state acquires evidence of crime independently from testimony
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
o
use immunity does not violate fifth amendment’s prohibition against self-
incrimination
kastigar v united states, 1972
o
less protections than transactional immunity
witness cannot refuse government’s offer of immunity
failure to testify → jail term for contempt of court
subpoena power: powers of the grand jury to gather evidence o
can issue a subpoena for individuals to appear and testify before a grand jury or bring evidence for consideration
o
failure to comply can be punishable as contempt
“contempt of the grand jury is potentially open ended— as long as the grand jury is in existence and as long as the person refuses to comply, the person can sit in jail.”
contempt power can be use for punishment o
can imprison someone without a trial
o
→ branzburg v hayes, 1972
o
happens to journalists
law in action: prosecutorial domination
grand jury/prosecution relationship
prosecutor is meant to function as a legal adviser o
in practice, prosecution dominates
o
→ prosecution controls what witnesses grand jury meet
o
→ laypeople heavily influenced by the legal advice of a prosecutor
united states v williams o
government has no obligation to disclose evidence to the grand jury that would clear the defendant
net result is grand juries function as the ‘rubber stamp’ for the prosecutor o
members of grand juries rarely voice dissent → approve virtually all of prosecution’s recommendations
calls for reform: prosecution over the jury’s decisions o
“The grand jury is the total captive of the prosecutor who, if he is candid, will concede that he can indict anybody at any tine, for almost anything, before any rand jury” → u.s. district court judge for northern district of illinois, william campbell
calls for abolishing the grand jury o
success depends on a state level— some judicial reformed succed
o
harder on a federal level: requires a constitutional amendment
calls for abolishment based on concerns that they (grand jury proceedings) are misused to
serve partisan political ends
national association of criminal defense lawyers is the biggest advocate for federal grand jury reform o
citizen’s grand jury bill of rights
ex) right to counsel during testimony, requiring prosecutors to disclose exonerating evidence, allowing testimony from those under investigation
arraignment
in trial court of general jurisdiction for felony charges
initial appearance, arraignment similar in that the defendant must be informed with “some specificity about the alleged criminal actions.” o
difference is felony defendants cannot enter a plea
procedurally: arraignment provides the opportunity to ensure the case is on track for disposition
rarely a major decision-making stage in the criminal justice process o
importance is indirect → “signifies to all members of the courtroom work group that the defendant is in all probability guilty…the likelihood of being found not guilty is now slim.”
law in action perspective: case attrition
law on books suggests a mechanical process— cases moving ‘automatically’ between pretrial stages
law in action emphasizes a dynamic process— cases can be eliminated during early stages
nolle prosequ: no prosecution o
form of dismissal
attrition: arrest without conviction
why attrition occurs
three facets of discretion o
legal judgements
o
policy priorities
o
personal standards of justice
categories/facets are not mutually exclusive o
“some screening decisions are based on more than one criterion”
legal judgements o
need to ask whether there is there sufficient evidence to prove the elements of an offense
o
all elements of prosecution must be present prior to filing charges
o
“The legal-evidentiary strength of the case is the reason cited most often for prosecutors declining to prosecute cases”
o
and noncooperative witnesses, insufficient evidence, issues with witness testimony, problems obtaining evidence
o
initial concern with probable cause → prosecutable case
o
prosecutable cases are required to meet standards of proof in addition to probable cause
policy priorities o
general prosecutorial policies about case priorities
o
ex: greater amounts of resources granted to more serious offenses
o
priorities can be reflected in office structure
da’s have priority prosecution programs that focus on major narcotics dealers, organized crime, sex offenders, etc
personal standards of justice o
attitudes of courtroom work group ABOUT what should and shouldn’t be punished
o
based on subjective assessment on part of the prosecutor
o
→ “the case is not as serious as the legal charge suggests.”
o
“cheap”, or “garbage” cases
reasons for attrition (referred to as such) o
“prosecution would serve no useful purpose”
o
“interests of justice”
the “criminal justice wedding cake”
criminal justice wedding cake
celebrated cases o
the select few cases that dominate media attention
o
can be local
o
treated as exceptional from cj officials → heightened public scrutiny
o
“The cases are also extraordinary because they frequently involve the rarest of criminal court events—the full jury trial.”
o
“As in morality plays of old and soap operas of today, public attention is focused on the battle between good and evil, although who is playing which role is not always obvious.”
o
high impact on public perception of criminal justice → law on the books
serious vs lesser felonies o
seriousness of crime, criminal record of suspect, relationship between victim and offender
o
“how much is the case worth?”
o
serious tend to be murder, armed robbery, rape
misdemeanors o
around half are public order offenses
o
around a third are property crimes/minor interpersonal altercation
learning objectives
1.
LO1 Define the two methods of estimating the amount of crime in the United States. In the United States the two methods of estimating the amount of crime are the Uniform Crime Reports, based on crimes reported to the police, and the National Crime Victimization Survey, based on self-reports from households.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
2.
LO2 Discuss how arrests made by the police impact the criminal court process. Arrests made by the police impact the criminal court process in two ways: (1) if the police fail to gather enough evidence, it will be difficult for the police to gain a conviction, and (2) the increase in the number of arrests has swollen the dockets of the courts.
3.
LO3 List the four ways that criminals are formally charged in court and the major actors in each of these important documents. Defendants are formally charged in court with a violation of the criminal law by: (1) a complaint signed by the victim, (2) a bill of information filed by the prosecutor, (3) an arrest warrant prepared by the police, or (4) a true bill issued by a grand jury.
4.
LO4 List the four most common ways that defendants secure pretrial release. The four most common ways defendants secure pretrial release are: (1) release on recognizance (ROR), (2) cash bond, (3) property bond, and (4) bail bond through the services of a commercial bail agent.
5.
LO5 Compare and contrast “law on the books” and “law in action” approaches to bail setting, including the overall effects of the bail system on criminal defendants and their cases. Law on the books expresses a strong preference for bail unless clear and convicting evidence establishes that: (1) there is a serious risk that the person will flee; (2) the person may obstruct justice or threaten, injure, or intimidate a prospective witness or juror; or (3) the offense is one of violence or one punishable by life imprisonment or death. In contrast, law in action affects bail setting in terms of uncertainty risk, jail overcrowding, and situational justice. How these factors coalesce in bail decision affects the processing of criminal defendants in terms of jail
conditions, disparate impact on racial and ethnic minorities, the failure of some defendants to appear in court as promised, and case disposition.
6.
LO6 Explain the role bail agents play in the criminal justice system. The bail agent provides a specialized form of insurance and makes a profit by focusing on low-risk offenders accused of less serious crimes.
7.
LO7 Contrast how the “law on the books” approach to criminal justice and the “law in action” perspective offer contrasting views of the preliminary hearing. The law on the books approach to criminal justice emphasizes that during the preliminary hearing the judge decides whether there is probable cause to hold the defendant, while the law in action perspective emphasizes that in most jurisdictions there is a strong probability that the case will proceed.
8.
LO8 Explain why some jurisdictions use grand juries extensively and others do not. Grand juries are used extensively in jurisdictions where the constitution requires a grand jury indictment in all felonies. In jurisdictions that do not have this constitutional requirement, grand jury indictments are required in only select offenses.
9.
LO9 Delineate the three major reasons for case attrition. The three major reasons for case attrition are (1) legal judgements (lack of evidence), (2) policy priorities (some cases are considered too minor to be prosecuted), and (3) personal standards of justice (attitudes of the courtroom work group about what actions should or should not be punished).
10. LO10 Describe the four layers of the criminal justice wedding cake. From the top to the
bottom, the four layers of the criminal justice cake are (1) celebrated cases (which are very atypical), (2) serious felonies (which are treated as meriting major
attention), (3) lesser felonies (which are treated as of less importance), and (4) the lower depths (which comprise the large volume of misdemeanor arrests).