Mahrukh property law 2
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
COMSATS Institute Of Information Technology *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
2
Subject
Law
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
19
Uploaded by CoachRaven2431
PROPERTY LAW AND LAND LAW QUESTION 1 PART A
Issue: The aim is to recognise the different property rights involved in the given situation and provide advice to the parties involved in line with land registration laws and legal requirements. Examining the Property Mosaic (LO1)
Different types of property
It is possible to categorize different types of property by virtue of their ownership type, interest duration, and legal right associated with each category. Here's a more detailed distinction between some key categories: 1. Freehold Property vs. Leasehold Property
: Freehold Property: The absolute ownership forever. These includes fee simple absolute and fee tail.
Leasehold Property: The right to use and own land for a certain time as provided in the conditions of a lease deal.
1
2. Ownership Types in Co-Ownership
:
Joint Tenancy: It entail co ownership with the right of survivorship. On death of a joint tenant, his interest in the property will go over to the surviving joint tenant(s).
Tenancy in Common: Distinct, separate, and transferable shares in co-ownership. No right of
survivorship.
2
3. Life Estate vs. Future Interests
: Life Estate: Perpetual ownership during one’s lifetime. Thereafter, it passes to the remainderman or to the grantor.
Future Interests: These include contingent remainders, vested remainders, and executory interests that come into force at a later date.
4.
Community Property vs. Separate Property
:
Community Property: In community property states, any property acquired during a marriage is regarded as jointly owned by both spouses.
Separate Property: Unowned property belonging to just one spouse.
3
5.Personal Property Rights
:
Easements: ** Allow a non-owner to occupy someone else’s land for a particular reason.
Covenants: Promises and pledges concerning uses of land.
Profit à Prendre: The right to enter someone’s land and take out things such as minerals or timber.
1
Myking J R, ‘Leasehold and Freehold c. 1200–1750’ (2020) 1000-1750 In Peasants, Lords, and State: Comparing Peasant Conditions in Scandinavia and the Eastern Alpine Region https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/9789004433458/BP000005.pdf
accessed 12/16/2023
2
KAYLA MOSES, ‘What is co-ownership of a property?’ (
Pacaso
, NOVEMBER 16, 2023) < https://www.pacaso.com/blog/what-is-co-ownership-property
> accessed 12/16/2023
3
Patrick Hicks, ‘Estate Planning for Community Property vs Separate Property’ (
trustandwill.com
, 1 January 2023) < https://trustandwill.com/learn/community-property-vs-separate-property
> accessed 12/16/2023
6
.
Equitable Interests vs. Legal Interests
: Equitable Interests: Such as beneficial interests in a trust recognised in equity rather than at law.
Legal Interests: Lawfully recognizable and enforceable.
7.Licenses vs. Easements
:
Licenses: Non-transferred personal right of way over another’s land for specified purposes.
Easements: They often represent more permanent arrangements that afforded third parties’
right of way on others’ land.
It is important to understand these differences because they play a major role in ownership,
utilization, and transfer of the property. Definitions of legality, however, typically depend upon specific jurisdictions and distinct local legal traditions
.
4
(P1)
Andrew's disposition towards Isobel: Isobel obtained legal possession of Grantchester from Andrew, which set in motion a series of property rights governed by the "Land Charges Act 1972" and the "Land Registration Act 2002." Given that Isobel is presently the legally acknowledged proprietor, Section 132 of the LRA is applicable. Therefore, it is crucial to carefully examine her role as a buyer. However, it is crucial to comply with the specifications stated in Section 4 of the LCA. Due to the conflicting nature of the restrictions, it is crucial to carefully assess Isobel's eligibility to make a purchase and the potential repercussions of her actions in the future. Dora's Easement refers to a legal right granted to Dora to use someone else's property for a certain purpose. The specialties under section 27 of LRA 2002 stipulate the terms under which Steve’s ten years lease will be held on White field, bestowing on him a Lease hold interest. Considering the lengthy time of this section, section 33 comes in handy, leading to Section 32 registrations. Nonetheless, the extensive catalogue of dominant interests under Schedule Two Part I can provide adequate protection of Steve’s rights even if he is unregistered. This is a clear indication that unregistered titles can be perceived as quite complicated as it requires striking a delicate balance between the duration of a leasehold agreement and the legal protection. Steve's ownership rights in a leasehold property
: The details of steve’s ten-year lease under section 27 of LRA 2002
5
are that he enjoys a leasehold interest in white field. Considering this durability, Section 33 continues to relate thus requiring registration in accordance with Section 32. Although Steve is not registered on Section 29, a comprehensive list of overriding interests may shield his rights. This illustrates the complexity of the issue of unregistered titles and the difficulty in finding an acceptable compromise between leasehold duration and legal protection. "(P1)".
Ryan's Purchase Agreement: Comprehending the "Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989" gets difficult when Andrew officially gives his permission to transfer ownership of Grantchester to Ryan. According to Section 2 of this legislation, real estate transfers must be carried out through 4
Helmholz R H, ‘The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land: Book Review’ (1988) 41(6) Vanderbilt Law Review https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol41/iss6/6/
accessed 12/16/2023
5
Land Registration Act, s 27
written agreements. This criteria must be met in order to thoroughly assess whether the written agreement satisfies all legal requirements. To evaluate the validity and ability to enforce Ryan's interest, it is crucial to comprehensively analyse important legal precedents and relevant statutes
. (M1
). The topic of discussion is Norton's Contingent Interest and Implied Trusts. The incarceration of Norton in a heavily fortified medical facility raises the complex issue of implied trusts and contingent interests. The basis for his assertion and the financial resources he supplied are set under Sections 52 of the Law of Property Act 1925 and Section
27 of the Land Registration Act 2002. The landmark ruling in "Chhokar v. Chhokar
6
" sets a strict criterion for evaluating Norton's future interest, highlighting the importance of financial contributions in creating an implicit feeling of trust. Sections 27 of the Land Registration Act 2002 and Section 52 of the Law of Property Act 1925 are relevant to the subject of resultant trusts. The funds Norton used to buy Grantchester may potentially be used for this objective. Difference between Estate and Interest
The terms estate and interest are two different legal concepts in relation to ownership right and possession of land in land law.
7
It is important to understand that these terms are different and one cannot navigate them correctly without this knowledge. Here's an examination of the key differences: Estate
:
Estate in land simply implies the share of the right one can lay claim on over a piece of land. This implies the set of rights that one has towards a plot of land.
Examples: There are various types of estates existing in land like fee simple absolute, life estate, fee tail and leasehold.
Duration: Estate classification is made up of two categories; freeholds estates which run indefinitely while leasehold estates have a specified time according to the agreement.
I
nterest
:
Land interest is a right or an entitlement of parties involved over use, possession, and benefit gained. Interests may be possessory or non-possessory.
Examples: Some of these include easements, covenants, mortgages, and lease holdings.
Duration: They can be either temporary or permanent in their duration, depending on the nature of the interest. Take, for instance, a leasehold interest which is temporary and an easement which can last perpetually.
Key Differences
:
Nature
:
Estate: It denotes one’s possession over a particular plot of land, specifying its period and character.
Interest: This is a right or an entitlement in lands that can be owned or not be owned.
Bundle of Rights
:
Estate: Bundles together a set of ownership rights such as those pertaining to possession, using of it, leasing and selling off the property.
6
Chhokar v Chhokar [1984] FLR 313 (CA)
7
Barros D B, ‘Toward a Model Law of Estates and Future Interests’ (2009) 66 Wash. & Lee L. Rev https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/waslee66§ion=4
Accessed 12/16/2023
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Interest: It includes particular rights like easement, rent from a lease and covenant.
Duration
:
Estate: Duration-based classification includes fee simple absolute, life estate, and estate lease hold.
Interest: Depending upon how the interest is construed, it may be temporary or permanent (for example, a leasehold interest runs for a specific term while a perpetual easement is a continued interest).
Transferability
:
Estate:
Often can be sold or passed down through inheritance as long as it complies with legal provisions and limitations.
Interest
: Some of these interests will be readily transferable, and other interests will be transferred under limited circumstances.
Therefore, in summary, an estate denotes a general interest in the land while an interest refers to particular ownership interests with respect to the land. It is important to understand the complexities of property law as well as how people take ownership of real property using different means. (
P2)
Application of legal principles: Advice for individuals or groups who have a curiosity or participation in a specific subject: Ryan and Norton: Ryan must conduct a comprehensive and legal review of the contract to ensure its adherence to Section 2 of the "LP (MP) Act 1989." Norton is ready to return and may investigate the possibilities of implicit trusts by adhering to the protective measures outlined in LRA 2002 Section 27 and LPA 1925 Section 52. (M1, D1)
Steve and Dora: Steve strongly supports the possible security that the “overriding interests” element of section 29 might afford. For support, Dora needs to scrutinize carefully section 52 and section 53 (1)(a) by means of easement. It’s important for each party to act quickly to safeguard their unregistered rights in such a complicated law suit. To summarise: Therefore, having a comprehensive understanding of statutes and cases that lay out the numerous preconditions is vital for effectively administering properties with unregistered titles or managing property rights. Simultaneous utilisation of LCA 1972 and LRA 2002 shows
importance of such customised expert advice addressing needs of each party with specific issues. Therefore, all the parties concerned must tread warily utilizing a wealth of statutory and case law in order support their interest as the dispute proceeds.
PART B
Issue: An intricate legal setup is created by the development of the Grantchester case from the registered to the unregistered titles. There are various ways in which property law has previously not considered the implications arising out of the non-existence of a centralized
registry for Steve’s lease, Dora’s easement, Ryan’s purchase contract, and Norton’s conditional interest. These elements become extremely crucial for those titles which do not follow statutory registration procedures. Participants in this jurisdiction often have to deal with difficulties arising out of unregistered property law for lands. To fully understand the regulation of real estate transactions, it is necessary for one to carry out an exhaustive analysis in this complex environment. "(M1)".
Analysing the intricate legal structure: Unregistered titles and their repercussions Unrecorded Designations and the Fundamentals: Both the priority principle and the doctrine of notice offer justification for unregistered titles. Since unregistered titles are not kept in a centralised database, potential lawful buyers have the opportunity to examine each transaction
."(P1)".
Dora's Legal Right to Enter Unregistered Territory: While the act of registering is documented, it does not guarantee Dora's right to travel through Gold Field. In order for an unregistered interest to be valid and for Dora to have the right to claim it, Isobel must give notice of the agreement. This further exacerbates the complexity of the law. Steve's lease lacks registration
. The importance of Steve's ten-year lease, which he formalised through a deed, is heightened when it remains unregistered. Isobel, as the new owner, may still be obligated to comply with the leasehold interest, even if it has not been formally documented, due to the requirement of legal compliance. The user's input is void of any content. Unofficial Sales Agreement drafted by Ryan
: The absence of Grantchester's registration with the land registry presents challenges for Ryan's official purchase agreement, as it entails handling unregistered titles. For Isobel's equitable interest to have legal validity, she is required to give notice of the arrangement. In
the event that the registration process is not entirely finalised, there is a possibility of encountering gaps or discrepancies. An evaluation of Norton's contingency plan
: The presence of Norton in a highly fortified medical facility, without any supervision, adds an additional layer of complexity to his situation. The contingent interest he has, which arises from his financial contribution, becomes inextricably connected with the doctrine of resultant trusts, potentially affecting his entitlement upon his return. Undocumented information and Isobel's assertive actions: Isobel is subjected to divergent legal requirements as a result of her acquisition of ownership through an undocumented transfer from Andrew. Although she demonstrates assertiveness, her disregard for Dora's right of way and Steve's lease becomes more intricate in the absence of registration
."(P2)".
Application of legal principles: Guidance in the Unregistered Realm:
Dora's Unapproved Right of Way: Dora finds herself in a perilous predicament as she has the authorization to travel across Gold Field, but without the required registration to guarantee her safety. The concept of notice becomes intricately linked with the enforcement of Dora's rights, posing a unique difficulty that is unmatched in the realm of registered titles. The absence of a centralised record underscores the importance of comprehensive documentation in verifying and protecting her unregistered interest. Steve's Voyage via Leasehold: Since registration was not made, ten years’ lease which is Steve’s tenure holds weight as an unregistered claim. The notice requirements are important because in their absence, Isobel should still respect the leasehold rights of Steve even without it being formally recorded. Unregistered titles mean that Steve’s tenancy is complicated.
Ryan's Predicament of Equity:
Ryan’s legally valid purchase agreement on Grantchester puts him to an exposure of a dangerous thing as Grantchester is unregistered. His equitable interest is subject to the principles of notice and thus, he must act in order to preserve his rights. Notable cases like “City of London Building Society v. Flegg”
8
are cautionary yet emphasise the significance of fair interests in unregistered transactions. Precise paperwork at this moment will be essential in order to protect his interests, with quick law suiting employing relevant legal precedent as “Kingsnorth Finance Co Ltd v. Tizard”.
9
Isobel's proactive actions remained unrecognised or unregistered. As soon as she took possession of the property, Isobel told Steve that he should vacate White Field and prevented Dora from visiting Gold Field which are typical characteristics of unregistered ownership. Without registration rules to constrain her, she can move forward with persistence.
Norton's Dilemma in the Unregistered Realm
: The legitimacy of Norton's conditional stake, which is currently closely tied to the legislation governing unrecorded property, is being called into question as a result of his hospitalisation. Non-registration results in the adoption of more equitable measures and the
creation of trusts, potentially affecting Norton's rights upon his return. To safeguard Norton's financial investment in Grantchester, it is crucial to execute strategic measures because to the heightened legal complexity associated with the unregistered territory. Norton can initiate legal action by doing a comprehensive analysis of prior judicial rulings, such as the case of "Vandervell v. Inland Revenue Commissioners
.
10
""(D1)". To summarise: 8
City of London Building Society v. Flegg
[1987] UKHL 6, [1987] AC 54
9
KINGSNORTH FINANCE V TIZARD
[1986] 1 WLR 783
10
Vandervell v. Inland Revenue Commissioners
[1967] 2 AC 291 (HL)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
The lack of a registration mechanism in Grantchester creates a legally complex situation, where unregistered titles have a substantial impact.
11
The intricacies of observation, fair rights, and intentional documentation are crucial in this developing field. Every person involved in the legal system must have remarkable intelligence and competence in navigating unfamiliar and unofficially recognised areas. People might employ the laws specified in unregistered land law to safeguard and uphold their rights in the complex domain of real estate transactions. QUESTION 2
Issue: To determine the historical background, establishment of the mortgage procedure, and verification of the mortgage terms among the parties engaged in the provided scenario. Rule of law is a judicial philosophy that mandates the equal application of laws to all individuals and entities, without bias or favouritism. Comprehending the complexities of mortgage financing (LO2) Initiating the mortgage
: The LRA 2002 stipulates that the process of establishing a legal mortgage is intricate due to the combination of legal prerequisites and equitable considerations. Edward's case falls under Section 27 of the Act, which highlights the importance of precise documentation regarding the mortgage obtained for the bar. The establishment of mortgages is regulated by a court precedent called "Bristol and West Building Society v. Henningham".
12
Edward's research of mortgages elucidates the complex correlation between equitable principles and statutory obligations—a subtle interplay where the terms must conform to numerous legal factors. "(P4)".
Historical Evolution: Equity of Redemption The historical development of mortgages illustrates the notion of equity of redemption, which serves as a safeguard to protect borrowers from unfavourable situations.
13
Throughout history, the legal theories of "Biggs v. Hoddinott
14
" and "Noakes v. Rice
15
" have consistently supported principles of equity and protected mortgage agreements from obstacles. However, as the worldview advances, this conventional explanation is being carefully scrutinised, as demonstrated by the "Kreglinger v. New Patagonia Meat & Cold Storage" lawsuit.
16
Edward's mortgage includes a prohibition on purchasing alcoholic 11
Abdulai RT and Ochieng E, ‘Land registration and landownership security: An examination of the underpinning principles of registration’ (2017) 35(1) Property Management https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PM-09-2015-0051/full/html
accessed 12/16/2023
12
Bristol and West Building Society v. Henningham
[1985] 1 WLR 778
13
Ghent A, ‘How do case law and statute differ? lessons from the evolution of mortgage law’ (2014) 57(4) The Journal of Law and Economics https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/680931
accessed 12/16/2023
14
Biggs v Hoddinott
[1898] 2 Ch 307 (CA)
15
Noakes v. Rice [1901] UKHL 3, [1902] AC 24
16
Kreglinger v. New Patagonia Meat & Cold
Storage [1913] UKHL 1, [1914] AC 25
beverages, which provides a modern perspective on the evolution of mortgage terms. In order to determine if Edwards' solus tie exceeds the limitations of a trade limitation, it is essential to apply the legal precedent established in the "Esso Petroleum v. Harpers Garage"
case.
17
"(P4)".
Application of legal principles: Significance of Power of Sale: The Inherent Authorization and Conditions Under section 101 of the law of property act 1925
18
, a mortgage is allowed to sell the relevant properties without special authorization. Edward’s mortgage agreement and Section 103 need a careful review of Section 101. The “Cheltenham v. Krausz
19
” case highlights the balance between the borrower’s right to offer the mortgaged property for sale and the lenders’ right to object to such. The borrower and lender’s legal entitlement before selling the property must be considered. Accordingly, precedence must lie with the examples uncovered in the “Cuckmere v. Mutual Finance” scenario.
20
The in depth analysis of “Meftah v. TSB
21
” is necessary for an extensive understanding of legal rights of mortgage borrowers and lenders. Considering that Polly PLC is being investigated and there are conflicting interests, it is imperative to understand all possible consequences for sale. "(M2)".
Ownership: Fundamental Right Within Limitations The concept of ownership adds complexity to Edward's mortgage, as it is commonly perceived as a means of rectification rather than an inherent entitlement. The court decision of "Four-Maids Limited v. Dudley Marshall Properties Limited
22
" confirmed the mortgagee's right to occupy the property. However, the scope of this privilege is restricted by the limitations imposed by laws and legal precedents. This is a result of the simultaneous convergence of the establishment of the right of ownership and an ongoing legal dispute. Thoroughly analysing the restrictions linked to property ownership can alleviate any possible hesitations Edward might have in fulfilling future loan obligations. It is essential to carefully evaluate this entitlement, including how legislative limits correspond
with the broader context of mortgage facts, due to its conditional nature
."(M2)".
Edward's Mortgage Journey: Issue of Loan Repayment and Response from Bell Brewers: The initial try by Edward to get mortgage from Bell Brewer was very fruitful in that, he managed to raise the money to repair the pub. On the other hand, a different picture emerges from the current financial situation which took place in 2016. The case is further complicated by the way that Bell Brewers reacted to Edward’s failure to make good his debt. It is normally a formal mortgage but since Edward did not observe the payment scheme it is presently under review. By way of Bell Brewers’ communication, the fact that Polly PLC intends to buy off the pub is brought out in focus and emphasized. On the other 17
Esso Petroleum v. Harpers Garage
[1967] UKHL 1, [1968] AC 269
18
Property act 1925, s 101
19
Cheltenham & Gloucester plc v Krausz
[1997] 1 WLR 1558 (CA)
20
Cuckmere v. Mutual Finance
[1971] EWCA Civ 9, [1971] 2 WLR 1207
21
Meftah V Lloyds TSB Bank PLC
[2001], [2001] 2 All ER (Comm) 741
22
Four-Maids v Dudley Marshall (Properties) [1957] Ch 317 (HC)
hand, it is also evidenced that Edward has been purchasing beer from different competing brewery companies recently. In this regard, looking at the mortgages’ terms is important since any default will have implications on ownership of property and other chances. Solus Tie: Examining the Limitations of the Trade Dilemma: In their mortgage agreement, there is an exclusive tie clause known as solus, which compels him to buy only alcoholic beverages from Bell Brewers. However rare it may be, this contractual phrase causes concern whether it can constitute an actionable restraint on trade. Protection from burdensome and harsh restrictions can be derived from two landmark decisions in “Biggs v. Hoddinott
23
” and “Noakes v. Rice
24
”. Kreglinger v. New Patagonia Meat
25
is another precedent illustrating this viewpoint and outlining a timeframe for the exclusive agreement that can exceed the duration of a mortgage. In looking at Edward’s exclusive contract in comparison with the “Esso Petroleum v. Harpers Garage
26
” case, careful scrutiny of the facts may be necessary.
Examining the Limitations of Remedial Rights:
The appetite for Bell Brewer’s assets also gets stronger as the probability of them defaulting on the loans gets higher. Four-Maids v. Dudley Marshall
27
, established the mortgagee’s right to possession. The solution in this case requires a comprehensive investigation of the limitations that result from ownership as an option. Edward's approach of making decisions strategically: To avoid possible financial trouble, Edward should start to consider very carefully all the decisions that ought to be made. His mortgage agreement includes a solus tie, a power of sale and prospective possession interlaced together. The peculiarities involved in negotiations, as well the legal proficiency will be necessary for Edward to undertake these uncommon conditions effectively. The situation is, however, difficult for Edward as Bell Brewers express opposing thoughts and the inability to pay off on time. This demands the use of an experienced and wise approach concerning a remodel in the bar, desire to keep on
owning, and looming risk of forced sale-offs. Detailed explanation by Edward on how the mortgage works is very critical since it brings out other hidden aspects requiring scrutiny legal complexity entrenched in the mortgages. The historical versus contemporary view of solus tie, power of sale, and possession remedy is the root of the difficulty in Edward’s bar. These choices that he takes as he traverses this strange terrain of mortgage dynamics matters a lot not only for his practice but also for the field of property law.
Instructions for Edward:
At present, Edward’s fate hangs in the balance as the choices he makes could determine the
future for his club. Taking into consideration both existing legal intricacies and past principles, he must review the contractual agreement which obligates him to purchase only alcohol from Bell brewers. The enforceability of this phrase, is considered using Esso Petroleum methodology that makes me questions about effects on trade restrictions. Further, the forthcoming incapacity to pay demands a rigorous assessment of the decision 23
Biggs v Hoddinott
[1898] 2 Ch 307 (CA)
24
Noakes v. Rice [1901] UKHL 3, [1902] AC 24
25
Kreglinger v. New Patagonia Meat & Cold
Storage [1913] UKHL 1, [1914] AC 25
26
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper’s Garage (Stourport) Ltd
[1968] AC 269 (HL)
27
Four-Maids v Dudley Marshall (Properties) [1957] Ch 317 (HC)
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
to sell off the property which is guided under the Section 103 and checked according to the Section 101. Edward can also be wise when making final decisions by following the precedence rules as established by “Meftah V.TSB
28
” and “CheltenhamV.Krausz
29
”, these are
concerned with rights of both lenders and borrowers.
To summarise: Currently, Edward is struggling with the practical aspects versus legal developments in mortgage’s movements. Whether his bar succeeds or fails depends on the interconnection of established norms and preceding facts. This may sound weird, but Edward wants to sell the house and buy it again so as to overcome the situation. Later on, Edward would own the
asset completely. However, he is aware of the difficulties of property laws and that it takes an intelligent gamble to defend his stakes as mortgages are unstable.
QUESTION 3
Issue:
In their search, they find a real flat where it is difficult to rent a place on account of multiple tenancy agreements. Persons should therefore read the entire procedure for drafting the agreement with much focus on its complex legal terminology and its different ramifications at the clause levels. The historical background, present legislation system as well as evolving
legal relations in landlord–renter’s relationship are analyzed within this lease landscape research. Essential Protocols for a Lease Agreement
: It requires complete adherence to strict procedures as it pertains to documenting all of the legal actions undertaken in drawing up a lease contract. In the famous “Street v. Mountford
30
” case, importance was placed on contract’s substance instead of its names. Sections 52(2)(d) and 54(2) of the LPA 1925 stipulate that a lease is only binding if it is by way of writing. The Land Registration Act 2002 provides for section 27(2), 33 and 34 which are the main procedural requirements for registered land. Complex legal system crafted by historical contingencies becomes the legal basis for validating and safeguarding leaseholds. "(P3)".
Analysing the Differentiations Between Lease and Licence in Legal Terminology The presentation document by Steven raises the enduring question: would he go for a lease or a licence? In the case known as “Street v. Mountford”, a legal precedent was established whereby there is more importance placed on the essence of contract rather than how the contract might come to be known by name. These legal cases, “Antoniades v Villiers
31
” and “AG Securities v. Vaughan
32
” are quite helpful in understanding this difference. There is a different thing that makes this apartment stand out; it has a double bed in the bedroom and
28
Meftah V Lloyds TSB Bank PLC
[2001], [2001] 2 All ER (Comm) 741
29
Cheltenham & Gloucester plc v Krausz
[1997] 1 WLR 1558 (CA)
30
street v. mountford
[1985] UKHL 4, [1985] AC 809
31
Antoniades v Villiers
[1990] 1 AC 417 (HL)
32
AG Securities v Vaughan
[1990] 1 AC 417 (HL)
a convertible couch in the living room which have a huge impact on evaluating the above-
average quality of the lease contract. The historical consideration of the evolution of legal precedents towards leasehold rights and how such perceptions have impacted society.
"(P3)".
Application of Legal Principles: An Examination of Clause 2 and Its Consequences in Steven's Guarantee The oral promise made by Stephen to Jeniffer adds an additional component of power into the formal agreement, although he did not formally write it down. Clause two gives landlords power to do whatever they feel like with the property hence continuing conflict between these privileges and tenants’ rights. Despite Steven says he will not remain in a night, full legal considerations must be carried out to analyze the complete ramifications associated with that proposal. The precedents, which refer to previous legal rulings set by cases such as “Mikeovar v. Bradley”.
33
signify that the landlord’s right to access and tenant’s entitlement to unhindered use and enjoyment of premises should be established with ut
Lease Termination: Rights and Limitations
Several statues govern the process of leaving such as the Criminal Act 1977, Section 146 of LPA 1925, and Section 2 of Protection from Eviction act of 1977. Landlord-tenant relationships that are fair and righteous require focus on notices clause and proper proceedings and this forms part of my focus. Yet, there are limitations on the scope of forfeiture powers, as the judges strive to prevent imbalance. Before they start to determine what opportunities there is for Kevin and Jennifer, they must have to really know what those conditions are about.
Analysing the correlation between human rights and lease development
: To fully understand the wider impact of houses as a fundamental human right, intensive analysis is required. The rise of lease law has followed the recognition that dignified life depends on having a proper place to live. These are the fundamental rights stated in Article 25 which correspond to the growing body of works in property law. The experience of getting home by Kevin and Jennifer, as well as their legal journey, represents the larger social understanding of house as the fundamental right instead of shelter. A case study of this nature has a people-centered perspective that demonstrates how property law reflects societal norms. "(M2)".
Lease as a Dynamic Document: Contrary to common belief, the lease is not a fixed document but rather a flexible legal agreement that can be modified to accommodate the requirements and situations of both landlords and tenants. Kevin and Jennifer should comprehend that the lease is a flexible agreement that can be modified through mutual consent, rather than a rigid set of regulations. This perspective promotes proactive involvement in transparent communication with Steven, establishing a conducive atmosphere for adapting to uncertainties or evolving circumstances
."(D1)".
33
Mikeover Ltd v Brady
[1989] EWCA Civ 1, [1989] CR 218
An examination of the role of human behaviour in lease negotiations: Lease negotiations encompass both the interpersonal dynamics between landlords and tenants and the legal procedures. The interpersonal aspect is emphasised by the language employed in the text, Steven's verbal affirmation, and the overall demeanour of their interactions. Kevin and Jennifer must comprehend the influence of human behaviour as they navigate through this process. Foreseen Challenges and Adaptations in the Future: The growth of lease law does not conclude upon the signing of a contract; instead, it persists
in adapting to forthcoming challenges and modifications. Kevin and Jennifer should proactively anticipate any changes in their situation and commence discussions with their landlord over lease terms that can accommodate any modifications. An effectively drafted lease should establish a structure for seamless adjustments that may occur due to the inclusion of a new family member or changes in the dynamics of the workplace. When creating a leasing agreement for Kevin and Jennifer, it is important to consider not just the legal requirements but also broader sociological and human considerations
."(P3)"
The residential journey is intricate due to the ever-changing nature of property law, the intricate equilibrium between the rights of tenants and landlords, and the acknowledgment of housing as an essential human entitlement. Upon joining this dynamic realm, the lease transcends its mere contractual nature. It functions as a symbol that symbolises their collective experience and showcases the continuous progression of property rights. Analysing the Lease Equilibrium: Attaining the Optimal Balance The thorough examination of lease legislation reveals a persistent effort to maintain an equitable and harmonious equilibrium between the rights of landlords and the safeguards for tenants. The "Protection from Eviction Act 1977" and subsequent legal provisions prioritise the preservation of tenant rights. Nevertheless, our approach considers not only the legal structures but also the wider community conviction that housing is an essential entitlement. The evolution of legal systems throughout history has been driven by a narrative centred around safeguarding human rights, particularly emphasising the importance of the right to obtain and live in a safe and suitable home. Advice for Kevin and Jennifer: Comprehending the Difficulties of Leasing To successfully execute this residential project, Kevin and Jennifer must possess a comprehensive comprehension of the intricate legal framework integrated into their lease agreement. Current legislation offers legal safeguards for leasing agreements. Nevertheless, considering the possible consequences of Clause 2, it is essential to create clear and comprehensive agreements with Steven regarding the scope of his access privileges
."(D1)".
To summarise: Kevin and Jennifer will undertake the arduous work of negotiating and interpreting a residential lease agreement. The development of lease law, which is based on significant court rulings and laws passed by the government, has a strong connection with modern protections. Once an agreement is reached to live together in an apartment or flat, it is essential to understand and comply with the various requirements regarding leasehold rights, termination procedures, and the delicate balance of rights between the landlord and
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
tenant. The case of Kevin and Jennifer exemplifies the dynamic nature of property law and the ongoing endeavour to reconcile disputes by harmonising leases with the fundamental human entitlement to secure and habitable dwelling.
QUESTION 4
To determine the proposed modifications and improvements of the Commonhold and Land Registration Act in the United Kingdom.
Achieving a harmonious equilibrium between individual rights and the progress of society (LO3):
The larger question that is raised regarding property rights versus development interests, is highlighted by Ben’s involvement with his paintball enterprise in Blackacre. When we consider the larger picture, the tension between two important concepts intensifies: the right of a landowner to control his or her land and the notion of ethical/ responsible land utilization that leads to positive social outcomes. Nevertheless, in cases of easements or covenants, this matter is no less important. It is important to undertake an extensive audit of legal regulations and their influence on sustainable development. Ben’s action makes a person ponder on new trends on property rights that can encourage responsible land use more than just legal problems. "(P6)".
Blackacre is bound by a restrictive covenant. The covenant regarding Blackacre consists of two separate elements: a restriction on the use of the cottage and a requirement to contribute to the maintenance of the driveway. As
to Section 78 of the Law of Property Act 1925, the primary issue pertains to the transfer of both rights and obligations. The "Halsell v. Brizell
34
" case highlights the necessity for Ben to adeptly navigate the various difficulties involved in determining the intention to create both an advantage and a liability. The case of "Federated Homes v. Mill Lodge Properties" underscores the need of unambiguous intent, while "Roake v. Chadha" offers valuable insights into the imperative of exact compliance with contractual obligations. Examining these previous occurrences is advantageous in assisting Ben to evaluate the importance and
appropriateness of the covenant
."(P6)".
Enactment of the legislation: Positive Covenant Conundrum: Ben's decision to abstain from assisting with the maintenance of the driveway is dictated by his positive responsibilities, which he justifies by constructing an additional access route. The precedent-setting legal ruling in "Tulk v. Moxhay
35
" demonstrates that the individual who initially made the covenant is legally bound
to fulfil its terms, even if a third party receives the benefits. Ben's creation of a distraction weakens the idea of shared accountability and advantage, which could greatly assist Adam's objective. The parameters of Ben's obligations and Adam's choices are determined by the complexities of mutual benefit and accountability, influenced by judicial precedents like the "Roake v. Chadha" case.
36
34
Halsall v Brizell
[1957] Ch 169 (HC)
35
Tulk v. Moxhay
[1848] 41 ER 1143
36
Roake v Chadha
[1984] 1 WLR 40
Field Use Covenant: Covenant or Easement One subject for investigation relates to what arrangement or arrangement makes it possible
for Zen to use this vast acreage for leisure purposes. Therefore, since it looks more like an easement as opposed to a covenant, a more extensive investigation is called for. This covenant can be ignored because it is what is expected of a person and that it does not interfere with the soil or affect what is beneath it. The absence of the notion of the servient tenement can be seen from the fact that it is not perceived as an easemenent in this case. Therefore, hiring Ben as the new propriety over Blackacre aggravates any controversy concerning easement. It would prove expedient to review the proposal for amending easements and covenants as part of the attempt to evaluate the viability of those rights in a dynamic legal environment. "(P5)".
Proposals for reform: A comprehensive overview of the process of transformation
. This idea of flexibility is already taking into account by the current legal framework, which considers a revision of easements and covenants in line with it. Ben’s predicament was made worse by the implementation of Law Commission’s recommendations. The Commission of Statutes suggests a more straightforward formulation of the stature, which likely will entail major amendments. This requires complete and thorough scrutiny. Nonetheless, while it is obvious what the benefits are, they should be carefully assessed along with their risks and implementation feasibility. In contemplation of its potential consequences, Ben would conduct a thorough analysis of rights and obligations for property
law, especially in regard to the reform aspect.
"(D2)".
Interactions between society and the surrounding area
: The social fabric of the local area, and even the law surrounding it, is highly affected by the success of Ben’s paintball business. Of major importance is the evaluation of Ben’s decisions
impact on the community. Nearby land owners should be able to respond to issues such as disruptions, safety concerns, and aesthetic alterations in the locality. It is also necessary for us to explore what the residents’ expectations are and what the societal components of property rights are.. "(M3)".
Incorporating technology into land use: There are concerns about how Ben's illness may interact with future technological breakthroughs, namely in the field of land use and management. Emerging technologies, which include smart city technology, Geographic Information System (GIS) mapping, and real-time monitoring tools, can help in finding new and creative solutions to land-related problems and promoting sustainable development. This article examines the potential areas of concurrence or divergence between established property rules and new technologies, providing a prospective perspective. This highlights the imperative need for law reform to synchronise with the swift advancements in technology.
Securing the enduring pertinence of property law: Assessing the adaptability of property law to accommodate evolving conditions is crucial, given the ongoing alterations stemming from proposed reforms. The case of Ben highlights the importance of strong and long-lasting legal systems, as it demonstrates the evolving dynamics of property owners' interactions. An anticipatory review can assess the pros and
cons of current property legislation regarding easements and covenants, while also exploring emerging issues such as the promotion of sustainable development, the use of smart technologies in property management, and changes in land use
."(M3)".
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR
)
The emphasis in legal discussions often lies on the court processes and not the alternative dispute resolution (ADR). Instead, mediation or arbitration will enable to resolve problems arising out of Ben’s actions faster and better. Assessing the practicality and usefulness of ADR strategies include recognizing that litigation may not be a wise or handy option in every
case.
37
Ben’s problem involves many perspectives that are not limited to easements and covenants. They are more concerned with the wider social issues surrounding current trends in technology and living together. As amendments happen in property law, it is important to construct the legal frameworks that are strong enough, since they have long life. Brief example is an attempt to showcase thorough property rights discussion in changing environment.
Lastly, Zen’s property has been used by Ben painted balling and by Adam frisbeeing. This is how complex relationship exists between easement and covenants. Moreover, Ben’s suggestions for the alternative access road and his failure to abide by the covenants regarding driveway maintenance would complicate any subsequent lawsuit. Changing a covenant into an easement is often a sophisticated project which implies detailed consideration of the case law and proposals regarding it. However, due to recent changes in the property laws, Ben has to make an important choice on his undertakings involving the land. In order to determine the best option for him, he should carry out a comprehensive evaluation of the rights assessment and carefully think about potential consequences of the proposed changes.
QUESTION 5
Evaluation of the historical perspective and updated aspects involved with commonhold and
how they are linked to Rhones legacy (LO4)
The Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act of 2002:
The adoption of the “Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002” was the first step in the
formulation of the concept of commonhold. The act offered a better solution than the traditional leasehold system and sought to put into disarray the conventional property ownership. In theory, commonholds allow the owner’s of property a share in management of common facilities and hence are fairer and eco-friendly arrangement. This led to higher levels of sustainability. However, the implementation of this concept has met with different challenges necessitating restructuring it for increased appeal. "(P7)".
Analysing the tangible execution of Commonhold
: The advantages and disadvantages of the commonhold system are evident when closely analysing its practical application. The core idea involves property owners collaborating to manage communal areas, with the goal of fostering a collective sense of ownership and 37
Shavell S, ‘Alternative dispute resolution: an economic analysis’ (1995) 24(1) The Journal of Legal Studies https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/467950
accessed 12/16/2023
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
accountability within the community for these spaces.
38
However, certain practical difficulties have arisen, particularly with the complexities of decision-making and conflict resolution within commonhold associations. The aforementioned flaws have been acknowledged. An examination of prominent legal processes, such as the "Avonridge Case," illustrates the intricate challenges that regular communities encounter and necessitates a comprehensive evaluation of the program's effectiveness
."(P7)".
Proposals for reform: A Crucial Evaluation: There is an increasing need to enact changes in land registration and common ownership, while simultaneously addressing the barriers that impede broader acceptance of these ideas. The main objective of the proposed modifications is to enhance the commonhold framework. The aim of this upgrade is to improve the user-friendliness and attractiveness of the foundation for developers and property owners. The creation of a commonhold council in 2021 demonstrates the government's commitment to settling problems and creating a favourable climate
."(M4)".
The Commonhold Council: An Agent of Transformation:
The formation of the commonhold council is credited with rejuvenating the reform movement. The mandate entails streamlining the commonhold structure, enhancing its accessibility, and fostering a conducive environment for widespread utilisation. To accurately assess the council's effectiveness, it is crucial to conduct a thorough review of its strategy in addressing the problems encountered in previous efforts to reach a consensus. A comprehensive examination is essential for understanding the council's function in distributing information, clarifying legal intricacies, and promoting a cooperative atmosphere. "(P8)".
Challenges pertaining to Land Registration: Secondly, land registration entails a lot of obstacles which ought also be changed. This led to
major reforms by enactment of LRA 2002. Nevertheless, the operation of this program has demonstrated that it is tricky to reconcile registered owner’s rights with legitimate interests.
Hence, when undertaking land registration reforms ideas, the goals it seeks to resolve include lack of clarity, increased reliability as well as dynamic shifts in property contracts.
The Efficacy of Proposals:
To ensure the relevance of these changes, an evaluation of their effectiveness must be done
thoroughly. Some people question if these steps really solve the land-registration antipathy and anti-commonhold, while others think it is more like a temporal solution for existing threats. Analyzing the impacts of these suggestions on the enhancement of transparency, streamlining procedures, and bringing the statutes in line with the demands of society can shed light on their success in advancing or inadvertently delaying change. "(D3)".
Examining the Impact of Rhone:
Commonhold was introduced in an “Act of Parliament” known as Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. However, the Rhone v. Stephens judgment seems to 38
Gościński J and Kubacki A D, ‘Land registration concepts in translation’ (2021) 34(5) International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-020-09800-y
accessed 12/16/2023
demonstrate certain problems associated with its implementation. The Rhone project limited the viability of common hold, making it impossible for many housing developers to get interested into the project. Given the sophistication and complicated dimensions of Rhone’s activity, there was a necessity for remedying of the commonhold, despite its prospects. To maintain the sustainability of Commonhold as an alternative to leasehold, these obstacles had to be eradicated.
39
The Commonhold Council is an administrative body established by the government.
Formation of the commonhold council in January, 2021 transformed debate concerning commonhold. This procedure has been used in advance against the difficulties that occur, and to create favourable conditions for commonhold schemes. Analysis of council’s efforts to simplify commonhold structure, better its transparency and provide favorable environment to its execution is greatly beneficial. Government’s commitment in promoting commonhold as the most preferred type of land ownership makes the overall situation feasible.
"(M4)".
The dynamic and progressive nature of developments in land registration
:
The continuous evolution of the land registration system has resulted in various revisions and alterations over time. It is essential to analyze judicial cases like “Stack v. Dowden
40
” and their influence on the co-ownership registration process in order to understand the constantly changing nature of the subject. Through its interaction with statutes, and specifically in Section 58 it is evident that the land registration system is getting better. However, an in-depth understanding of how the law responds to the transforming needs for
property ownership and registration is necessary in order to have complete grasp on these improvements. The LRA 2002: Introducing an Innovative Framework: Enactment of LRA in the year 2002 resulted in radical reforms in land-related issues. According to the act, this process was meant to reform it to facilitate modernization and simplifications on the scope and nature of the overriding interests in registred land. These improvements lie mainly in their effects on the specificity and clearness of the real estate deals. To understand the changes that the legal framework underwent entirely needs detailed analysis of the statutory duties stipulated in the LRA 2002- sections 27 and 29. The user's input is "(P8)".
Challenges and Achievements in Land Registration: However, for a clear understanding of such complexity pertaining to the issue of land registration after 2002, it is important to assess these barriers or failures as well as achievements involved. The law sought to protect rights of registered owners and legitimately interested persons without bias. The complexity
of these entanglements is highlighted by notable legal disputes such as “Chaudhary v. Yavuz”. Assesting the effectivity of the Act on solving doubt and providing reliable system that has links with real estate transactions.
In summary:
39
Snape J, ‘Case note: Rhone v Stephens: the burden of positive covenants’ (1994) The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/72155/
accessed 12/16/2023
40
Stack v. Dowden [2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 AC 432
The initiative for improving and amending the process of land registration and commonhold has been ongoing. The story of commonhold demonstrates the difficulties that arise during supervision of Rhone’s inheritances the way which commonhold committee was created. With regard to the LRA, the introduction of the LRA 2002 signaled a new lease in life for registered land while the successive changes evince unrelenting efforts towards creating a transparent and fair system for the registration of properties. Laws, government programs, and practical steps all play a combined role in forming the evolution of commonholds and land registrations.
For a complete analysis of the modifications related to land registry and commonhold it would do. This process entails looking into what the commonhold council had done, as well as exploring the complexities of commonhold in real life situations., For the success of this function, all complicated issues should be simplified so that they correspond to what needs are in practice and if all laws match the reality. These proposals will work based on their capacity to address the problems and create a basis for changing existing properties to community properties.
Bibliography Case Laws, Acts and Lagislation
AG Securities v Vaughan
[1990] 1 AC 417 (HL)
Antoniades v Villiers
[1990] 1 AC 417 (HL)
Biggs v Hoddinott
[1898] 2 Ch 307 (CA)
Bristol and West Building Society v. Henningham
[1985] 1 WLR 778
Cheltenham & Gloucester plc v Krausz
[1997] 1 WLR 1558 (CA)
Chhokar v Chhokar [1984] FLR 313 (CA)
City of London Building Society v. Flegg
[1987] UKHL 6, [1987] AC 54
Cuckmere v. Mutual
Finance [1971] EWCA Civ 9, [1971] 2 WLR 1207
Esso Petroleum Co Ltd v Harper’s Garage
(Stourport) Ltd [1968] AC 269 (HL)
Esso Petroleum v. Harpers Garage
[1967] UKHL 1, [1968] AC 269
Four-Maids v Dudley Marshall (Properties)
[1957] Ch 317 (HC)
Halsall v Brizell
[1957] Ch 169 (HC)
KINGSNORTH FINANCE V TIZARD
[1986] 1 WLR 783
Kreglinger v. New Patagonia Meat & Cold Storage
[1913] UKHL 1, [1914] AC 25
Land Registration Act, s 27
Meftah V Lloyds TSB Bank PLC
[2001], [2001] 2 All ER (Comm) 741
Mikeover Ltd v Brady
[1989] EWCA Civ 1, [1989] CR 218
Noakes v. Rice
[1901] UKHL 3, [1902] AC 24
Property act 1925, s 101
Roake v Chadha
[1984] 1 WLR 40
Stack v. Dowden
[2007] UKHL 17, [2007] 2 AC 432
street v. mountford
[1985] UKHL 4, [1985] AC 809
Tulk v. Moxhay
[1848] 41 ER 1143
Vandervell v. Inland Revenue Commissioners
[1967] 2 AC 291 (HL)
Online journals, Books and Website
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Abdulai RT and Ochieng E, ‘Land registration and landownership security: An examination of
the underpinning principles of registration’ (2017) 35(1) Property Management https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/PM-09-2015-0051/full/html
accessed 12/16/2023
Barros D B, ‘Toward a Model Law of Estates and Future Interests’ (2009) 66 Wash. & Lee L. Rev https://heinonline.org/hol-cgi-bin/get_pdf.cgi?handle=hein.journals/
waslee66§ion=4
Accessed 12/16/2023
Ghent A, ‘How do case law and statute differ? lessons from the evolution of mortgage law’ (2014) 57(4) The Journal of Law and Economics https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/680931
accessed 12/16/2023
Gościński J and Kubacki A D, ‘Land registration concepts in translation’ (2021) 34(5) International Journal for the Semiotics of Law-Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11196-020-09800-y
accessed 12/16/2023
Helmholz R H, ‘The Law of Easements and Licenses in Land: Book Review’ (1988) 41(6) Vanderbilt Law Review https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol41/iss6/6/
accessed 12/16/2023
https://trustandwill.com/learn/community-property-vs-separate-property
> accessed 12/16/2023
KAYLA MOSES, ‘What is co-ownership of a property?’ (
Pacaso
, NOVEMBER 16, 2023) < https://www.pacaso.com/blog/what-is-co-ownership-property
> accessed 12/16/2023
Myking J R, ‘Leasehold and Freehold c. 1200–1750’ (2020) 1000-1750 In Peasants, Lords, and State: Comparing Peasant Conditions in Scandinavia and the Eastern Alpine Region https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/9789004433458/BP000005.pdf
accessed 12/16/2023
Patrick Hicks, ‘Estate Planning for Community Property vs Separate Property’ (
trustandwill.com
, 1 January 2023) Shavell S, ‘Alternative dispute resolution: an economic analysis’ (1995) 24(1) The Journal of Legal Studies https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/467950
accessed 12/16/2023
Snape J, ‘Case note: Rhone v Stephens: the burden of positive covenants’ (1994) The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/72155/
accessed 12/16/2023