answer_1 (3)
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Harvard University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MISC
Subject
Law
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
5
Uploaded by ProfessorKangarooMaster2666
1
International Legal Challenges Discussion
Name
Course Name
Course Number
Professor
Date
2
Question 2. In a second case, a Colossal subsidiary in Bartan, an Asian country, wants
the company to enter into a sales contract with a subsidiary there, using the UN
Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) as the controlling
law. The VP needs to know the ramifications of this option and decide whether it is a
good idea.
The UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) is an
international policy that governs the formation of goods contracts sales which helps reduce
legal barriers to international trade (
Lookofsky, 2022)
. CISG provides a standard set of rules
that can be used to form sales contracts in UN member countries. An advantage that CISG
will benefit Colossal subsidiary in entering an international sales contract is the uniformity of
how the contracts are developed, making it easy to negotiate and execute the contract
(
Lookofsky, 2022)
. The standard rules of creating a contract help avoid disputes on which
country's laws to use in developing the contract, making the contract process difficult.
Another advantage is that CISG is designed to be fair for both parties, ensuring the
creation of balanced sales contracts that meet both parties' requirements (
Lookofsky, 2022)
.
This prevents an unequal position with a foreign partner where one party may take advantage
of the inferior party, making the agreement unfair. Another advantage that Colossal may
benefit from if they use CISG to create an international sales contract is the ability to defend
themselves in case of a dispute or breach of contract in a foreign country (
Lookofsky, 2022)
.
Because the law governing the sales contract formation is the same in both countries, the
company can effectively defend itself due to the knowledge of the law in the foreign country.
However, this can be a disadvantage because judges in different countries may interpret the
law differently, affecting the company's chances of winning a case in a foreign country
(
Lookofsky, 2022)
.
3
A disadvantage is that the interpretation of CISG in multiple languages may change
the meaning of the law creating a dispute between the contracting parties from different
countries due to the various understanding of the interpreted text (
Lookofsky, 2022)
. Another
disadvantage is that it is only suitable for sales contracts and may only work for some sales or
industries. CISG may not provide in detail some of the requirements that a sales contract
needs making it inadequate in creating sales contracts in some situations (
Lookofsky, 2022)
.
Using CISG to create a sales contract in Bartan will help save costs from resolving contract
disputes, have a standard process of developing the agreement and promote fair contractual
practices helping to make the contractual process smooth. However, Colossal should
renegotiate some provisions of the contract to ensure any concerns not adequately represented
by CISG are addressed for effective contract development.
Question 3. Colossal management also needs to know whether arbitration is a good idea
for a dispute resolution provision for both domestic and international contracts and
why.
Arbitration is a non-judicial process of solving disputes where a neutral third party
decides the fate of the disputing parties outside the court (
Coyle & Drahozal, 2019)
. In a
contract that uses arbitration to solve conflicts, it must be described in detail what the
arbitration process will entail, who the third parties are, the location of the arbitration, and the
number of arbitrators. Using arbitration to resolve domestic and international contract
disputes is a good idea because arbitration rewards can be enforceable in foreign countries.
Under the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral
Awards, member nations enforce arbitral awards issued in foreign countries (
Coyle &
Drahozal, 2019)
.
Another reason for using arbitration is its confidentiality, which makes it easier to
keep disputes private, ensuring limited public scrutiny, which might influence the final
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
decisions by the arbitrators (
Coyle & Drahozal, 2019)
. The arbitration process is not fixed;
where the process must follow a set of rules to ensure a successful and fair arbitration
process. The terms of the contract influence the arbitration process; hence the process is
unique to different contracts and agreements, making the process more personalized and
effective.
The arbitration dispute process is better than a court judgment because a US court
judgment may not be valid in a foreign country hence requiring arbitration because it can be
enforced in foreign countries that are members of the New York Convention (
Coyle &
Drahozal, 2019)
. When using arbitration to solve local and international contract disputes,
Colossal should ensure its contracts have an arbitration clause that is clear and fair to all
parties involved. The disadvantages that Colossal may experience when using arbitration are
biases of the arbitrators, limited options to appeal an arbitration decision, and inadequate
transparency in the arbitration process (
Coyle & Drahozal, 2019)
.
5
References
Coyle, J. F., & Drahozal, C. R. (2019). An empirical study of dispute resolution clauses in
international supply contracts.
Vand. J. Transnat'l L.
,
52
, 323.
Lookofsky, J. (2022). Convention on contracts for the international sale of goods (CISG).
In
Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG)
(pp. 1-256).
Wolters Kluwer.