Crime Scene Evidence Analysis Report
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Daystar University, Machakos *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
10
Subject
Information Systems
Date
Nov 24, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
14
Uploaded by CorporalKnowledge9710
1
Crime Scene Evidence Analysis Report
Student’s Name
Institution Affiliation
Course Name and Number
Instructor’s Name
Assignment Due Date
2
Crime Scene Evidence Analysis Report
Our Metro City Police Department's Crime Scene Response Unit (CSRU) is presented with a challenging scenario in the virtual crime scene simulation that necessitates careful examination. The crime scene manager designated me as the principal investigator, who stressed the need for recording protocols for safeguarding the crime scene, identifying, processing, and testing evidence, as well as admissibility requirements. There are several possible pieces of evidence in the situation. Thus, a thorough grasp of scientific techniques is required. This paper aims to unravel the intricacies of crime scene analysis, focusing on the virtual setting, and underscore the vital role of applying rigorous scientific approaches to contribute to solving crimes and upholding justice effectively.
Protecting the Virtual Crime Scene
Approaching the Virtual Crime Scene
The initial approach to the virtual crime scene requires a methodical and careful technique. I understand this as the head investigator of the Metro City Police Department's Crime
Scene Response Unit (CSRU). One must follow accepted crime scene management guidelines as
soon as one enters the game. These guidelines need a systematic approach and stress how crucial
it is to secure the area to stop unwanted entry (Bitzer et al., 2022). This first action protects the evidence's integrity and ensures that further investigation results are not jeopardized. A cautious approach also makes it possible to do an initial evaluation of the scene's general state, which helps identify any potential risks or difficulties that can influence the course of the investigation.
Moreover, the investigator draws the borders of the virtual crime scene with a comprehensive grasp of crime scene management concepts (Bitzer et al., 2022). To do this, a perimeter must be established to regulate access and guarantee that only authorized individuals
3
are there. A crime scene's proper demarcation makes identifying and recording evidence easier and guards against unintentional disruptions that might jeopardize the investigation (Bitzer et al.,
2022). This method's importance is in its capacity to create a controlled environment, which paves the way for an exhaustive and trustworthy examination of the virtual crime scene.
Protection from Contamination
Once the initial approach is established, the next critical aspect in the virtual crime scene analysis is implementing measures to protect against contamination or loss of evidence. The integrity and admissibility of proof in a criminal inquiry are seriously threatened by contamination, whether it be digital or physical. Strict measures need to be in place to mitigate this danger. These guidelines include using personal protective equipment (PPE) in the virtual setting to avoid unintentionally transferring drugs from the evidence to the investigator (Hu et al., 2022).
Moreover, just as thorough record-keeping is necessary in a physical environment, it is imperative to identify and record every individual who has access to the virtual crime scene. The danger of contamination and unlawful changes to the crime scene is reduced when access is limited to those necessary (Hu et al., 2022). Maintaining the virtual crime scene's integrity must be prioritized above all else since any compromise at this point might have far-reaching effects on how future evidence is handled, tested, and admitted into evidence in court. A fundamental phase in the investigation process is often the approach to the virtual crime scene. Investigators may guarantee a thorough and convincing analysis and aid in the quest for justice in a virtual setting by following crime scene management guidelines and putting precautions in place to avoid contamination.
Evidence Collection Procedures
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
4
Documenting Evidence
In the meticulous virtual crime scene analysis process, documenting each piece of evidence is a pivotal task that demands precision and attention to detail. This entails using cutting-edge technical instruments to gather and preserve pertinent data in the virtual world. To make a virtual duplicate of the crime scene, for example, digital photos or 3D scans can be used (Galanakis et al., 2021). Whether the evidence is a digital artifact or a physical thing, it should all
be methodically cataloged with metadata that includes information about its location, state, and any relevant context. This electronic documentation functions as a virtual chain of custody, tracking the handling and movements of every piece of evidence during the study and being a thorough record for investigation reasons.
When conducting virtual crime scene investigations, it is critical to stress the need for precise documentation. Documentation errors or omissions can potentially jeopardize the reliability and integrity of the evidence. To determine the validity of the investigation process, courts mainly depend on the completeness and correctness of the paperwork (Galanakis et al., 2021). Consequently, thorough and accurate documentation of every piece of evidence guarantees accountability and openness, improving the evidence's admissibility in court.
Collection Techniques
The virtual crime scene presents diverse evidence types, each requiring specific collection techniques tailored to preserve its integrity and relevance. Virtual methods for physical evidence can include keeping a secure digital record, documenting item handling, and using a digital chain of custody for weapons or biological samples. However, digital proof needs specific instruments for extraction and preservation to guarantee data integrity throughout the inquiry (Moussa, 2021).
5
The distinctiveness of each item's qualities justifies using various approaches for different
categories of evidence. For example, non-invasive techniques such as 3D scanning or high-
resolution imaging can be necessary for fragile or perishable products to get their features without physical touch (Moussa, 2021). Conversely, chemical examination materials might require specific virtual instruments to replicate laboratory procedures. The decision of which methods to use is influenced by the type of evidence and the overall objective of maintaining its admissibility, authenticity, and relevance during the virtual investigation. In general, documenting and gathering evidence in a virtual crime scene necessitates a sophisticated strategy
that uses cutting-edge technology instruments (Moussa, 2021). Investigators may guarantee a comprehensive and trustworthy analysis that withstands examination in judicial procedures by highlighting the significance of correct documentation and customizing collecting tactics to the unique character of each piece of evidence.
Chain of Custody
Meaning of Chain of Custody
Chain of custody is a foundational concept in forensic science and criminal investigations, encompassing the comprehensive documentation of the chronological handling, custody, control, and location of evidence from its discovery to its presentation in court (Batista et al., 2023). It is a painstaking process of precise record-keeping that follows the evidence through several stages, including gathering, moving, analyzing, and storing it. The evidence's legitimacy, dependability, and trustworthiness are established by this methodical recording, which functions as an uninterrupted chain (Batista et al., 2023). Keeping up a virtual chain of custody is essential to protecting the investigation's integrity in a virtual crime scene setting because it may be difficult to distinguish between digital and physical evidence.
6
Importance of Chain of Custody
The significance of the chain of custody is underscored by its function as a protective measure against evidence contamination, sabotage, or misuse. Fundamental prerequisites for establishing the credibility of forensic evidence include substantiating its integrity and resembling unaltered throughout its trajectory from the crime scene to the courtroom (Yahya et al., 2023). A critical determinant of the evidence's credibility, the chain of custody, is frequently examined in court. Appropriate documentation generates a trail that is open and transparent, allowing institutions such as the court, investigators, and attorneys to trace the origin of the evidence, verify its authenticity, and ascertain its admissibility.
Impact on Testing and Admissibility
Compromising the chain of custody can severely affect the testing and admissibility of evidence in legal proceedings. The evidence's credibility is called into doubt, and may face obstacles to its inclusion in court if the chain's integrity is jeopardized in any manner (Sarkar & Shukla, 2023). Testing might be significantly impacted since any disruption in the chain raises questions about the integrity, contamination, and preservation of the evidence. Subsequently, material evidence might be excluded from the court proceedings, perhaps undermining the prosecution's case.
Overstating the significance of a clearly defined chain of possession is challenging. Furthermore, an investigation's legitimacy can be robustly assessed by the court because a continuous and well-documented chain of events ensures the integrity of the evidence. In cybercrime scenes, where the entirety of the investigation may take place digitally, the virtual chain of custody becomes crucial (Sarkar & Shukla, 2023). Maintaining the principles of justice, impartiality, and the rule of law within the criminal justice system guarantees that this procedure
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
7
must be strictly followed. It transcends mere formality. The chain of custody is the foundation of a reliable and convincing forensic inquiry.
Evidence Testing
Field Testing
In virtual crime scene analysis, field testing serves as an initial phase for swiftly and on-
site assessing certain types of evidence. Virtual field testing might involve digital fingerprint analysis, digital forensics scanning in the early stages, or quick evaluations of specific visual cues in the simulated environment (Dahal et al., 2023). Doing field testing virtually speeds up the
investigation process by offering immediate findings that direct the following activities. Recognizing field testing's limits is essential, especially in the virtual world. The quality of the simulation may impact the accuracy of virtual field testing, and the lack of physical engagement with the evidence may limit the depth of analysis (Dahal et al., 2023). As such, although field testing is quicker, more is needed to provide the depth and accuracy of laboratory testing.
Laboratory Testing
Laboratory testing in the virtual crime scene involves more in-depth and specialized analyses, resembling procedures conducted in physical crime labs. For example, in a virtual laboratory scenario, intricate investigation of complex evidence, advanced digital forensics, and DNA analysis may all be carried out (Hassan et al., 2022). The key benefits of laboratory testing are the ability to apply cutting-edge scientific procedures and conduct thorough examinations. Through in-depth material analysis, virtual laboratory testing enables investigators to find minute
nuances that may be overlooked during field testing. Because laboratory testing is conducted under carefully regulated settings and with specialist equipment, it is frequently more reliable. This increases the accuracy of the results and the general credibility of the investigation process.
8
Comparative Analysis
Comparing the possible findings and in-court admissibility of field and laboratory tests is essential for a comprehensive understanding of their respective roles. Because field tests are preliminary, they could offer insightful early information, but their admissibility in court might be questioned because of possible limits in depth and accuracy (Hassan et al., 2022). However, laboratory tests, distinguished by their precision and thoroughness, frequently produce results more resilient to legal challenges. Field testing serves as a quick screening tool that directs investigators, while laboratory testing digs deeper into the nuances of the evidence to provide a solid basis for legal proceedings. Each sort of testing has complementary purposes. According to Hassan et al. (2022), the type of evidence, the objectives of the investigation, and the degree of confidence needed for presenting the evidence in court all influence the decision between field and laboratory testing. In the virtual crime scene, the differentiation between laboratory and field
testing generally represents the nuanced approach required for a thorough investigation. Both kinds of testing are essential; laboratory testing offers depth, accuracy, and dependability, while field testing provides speed and initial ideas. Collectively, they offer a synergistic investigation process that fortifies the legal foundation of evidence presented in court.
Admissibility of Scientific Evidence
Common Standards
The admissibility of scientific evidence in court is governed by well-established standards designed to ensure reliability and relevance. The Daubert or Frye standards are frequently used by courts to evaluate the scientific validity of presented evidence. The Daubert standard emphasizes the trial judge's function as a gatekeeper, which was established in the famous case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Coscia, 2019). The judge must
9
assess the evidence's scientific methodology, possible error rate, peer review, and broad acceptability within the relevant scientific community to meet this requirement. The Frye criterion is based on whether a scientific approach or theory is widely accepted in the relevant scientific community. It originated from the case of Frye v. United States (Coscia, 2019). By preventing the inclusion of unproven or pseudoscientific theories, these rules seek to guarantee that only credible and genuine scientific evidence is used in court.
Challenges and Solutions
Despite these standards, challenges to the admissibility of scientific evidence may arise, especially in virtual crime scene analysis. The unique characteristics of virtual evidence and its legal admissibility present one possible obstacle (Singh, 2021). There may be doubts about the authenticity and precision of virtual simulations, casting doubt on the dependability of the data gathered in a virtual setting. To address this, it is essential to show the reliability and correctness of the simulation tools utilized by creating a clear link between the virtual evidence and its real-
world equivalent.
Legal practitioners' need for more acquaintance with virtual forensic procedures presents another issue. Guaranteeing that courts and legal professionals possess comprehensive knowledge about the techniques and technology utilized in virtual crime scene investigations (Singh, 2021). Expert testimony, instructional resources, and joint efforts by forensic specialists and legal professionals can all help achieve this.
Adherence to set procedures and openness in the investigation process are proactive steps
to guarantee admissibility. The defensibility of the evidence is enhanced by upholding a strict virtual chain of custody, precisely recording the methods for gathering and analyzing evidence, and employing virtual forensic instruments that have been approved and verified (Singh, 2021).
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
10
Furthermore, cooperation between legal experts and forensic specialists throughout the investigation process improves understanding between the two parties and makes it easier for virtual evidence to be used in court. Forensic Science and a Just Society
The adherence to valid methodology and the utilization of forensic science in legal proceedings play a crucial role in fostering a more just society (Passalacqua et al., 2019). When applied rigorously and precisely, forensic science strengthens the credibility and impartiality of the criminal justice system, making it a potent instrument for pursuing justice. In forensic science, valid methodology guarantees that investigations are carried out using methodical, scientifically sound procedures. This entails using the scientific method, following defined protocols, and utilizing standardized processes (Passalacqua et al., 2019). Forensic specialists may offer impartial and precise assessments of the evidence by adhering to a sound methodology, reducing the possibility of mistakes, and protecting the investigation's integrity. This dedication to methodological rigor supports the credibility of the evidence offered in court, which leads to a more just society.
In addition, applying forensic science during a trial helps attorneys prove an accused person's guilt or innocence more accurately. When based on trustworthy procedures, forensic evidence can offer unbiased insights into the specifics of a crime. This impartiality is necessary to avoid erroneous judgments and guarantee that people are held responsible for their deeds based on strong scientific evidence. The use of forensic science thereby furthers the overall objective of justice in society. Furthermore, searching for the truth depends critically on sound forensic methods (Iancu, 2019). Legal experts can make well-informed conclusions regarding guilt or innocence by using reliable and unbiased information uncovered via adherence to
11
scientific standards. This pledge guarantees that people are treated fairly in the judicial system by
being consistent with justice and due process concepts.
But it's important to understand that forensic science's ability to support a just society depends on ongoing development and adaptation. To ensure that forensic science remains a trustworthy and valuable instrument in pursuing justice, it is imperative to embrace technological
improvements, adapt methods in light of new scientific findings, and recognize the limitations of some forensic approaches (Iancu, 2019). A more equitable society is generally greatly aided by applying sound methodology and forensic science in court. Forensic science preserves the values
of impartiality, correctness, and dependability, which contributes to the criminal justice system's credibility, protects against erroneous convictions, and eventually promotes the general objective
of justice in society.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the practical analysis of virtual crime scenes necessitates a meticulous approach grounded in scientific methodology. Following strict rules is essential, from safeguarding the crime scene to recording evidence, upholding the chain of custody, and carrying
out exhaustive testing. Forensic science becomes a valuable ally in the fight for justice by recognizing the differences between field and laboratory testing, comprehending the subtleties of
virtual evidence, and overcoming potential obstacles to admission. The validity of procedures is essential to maintaining the credibility of the criminal justice system and guaranteeing that the values of justice and truth are upheld in resolving legal disputes. This is why the credibility of the evidence produced in court depends on it.
12
References
Batista, D., Mangeth, A. L., Frajhof, I., Alves, P. H., Nasser, R., Robichez, G., ... & Miranda, F. P. D. (2023). Exploring Blockchain Technology for Chain of Custody Control in Physical
Evidence: A Systematic Literature Review.
Journal of Risk and Financial Management
,
16
(8), 360. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm16080360
Bitzer, S., Miranda, M. D., & Bucht, R. E. (2022). Forensic advisors: The missing link.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Forensic Science
,
4
(3), e1444. https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1444
Coscia, M. L. (2019). 'Trust Me, I'm a Doctor': Medical Malpractice as a Daubert-Free Zone.
Geo. LJ
,
108
, 1761. https://www.law.georgetown.edu/georgetown-law-journal/wp-
content/uploads/sites/26/2020/06/Coscia_%E2%80%9CTrust-Me-I%E2%80%99m-a-
Doctor%E2%80%9D-Medical-Malpractice-as-a-Daubert-Free-Zone.pdf
Dahal, A., McNevin, D., Chikhani, M., & Ward, J. (2023). An interdisciplinary forensic approach for human remains identification and missing persons investigations.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Forensic Science
, e1484. https://doi.org/10.1002/wfs2.1484
Galanakis, G., Zabulis, X., Evdaimon, T., Fikenscher, S. E., Allertseder, S., Tsikrika, T., & Vrochidis, S. (2021). A study of 3D digitization modalities for crime scene investigation.
Forensic Sciences
,
1
(2), 56-85. https://doi.org/10.3390/forensicsci1020008
Hassan, J., Devi, A., & Ray, B. (2022). Virtual Laboratories in tertiary education: Case study analysis by learning theories.
Education Sciences
,
12
(8), 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12080554
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
13
Hu, Q. R., Shen, X. Y., Qian, X. M., Huang, G. Y., & Yuan, M. Q. (2022). The personal protective equipment (PPE) based on individual combat: A systematic review and trend analysis.
Defence Technology
. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2022.12.007
Iancu, E. A. (2019). The Contribution of Forensic Science to Establishing the Truth in Criminal Proceedings.
Athens JL
,
5
, 457. https://www.athensjournals.gr/law/2019-
04LAW.pdf#page=103
Moussa, A. F. (2021). Electronic evidence and its authenticity in forensic evidence.
Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences
,
11
(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41935-021-00234-6
Passalacqua, N. V., Pilloud, M. A., & Belcher, W. R. (2019). Scientific integrity in the forensic sciences: Consumerism, conflicts of interest, and transparency.
Science & Justice
,
59
(5), 573-579. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?
article=1198&context=anthropologyfacpub
Sarkar, G., & Shukla, S. K. (2023). Behavioral Analysis of Cybercrime: Paving the Way for Effective Policing Strategies.
Journal of Economic Criminology
, 100034. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2023.100034
Singh, H. N. (2021). Forensic podiatry evidence and admissibility in court. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Harendra-Nath-Singh/publication/
355492726_FORENSIC_PODIATRY_EVIDENCE_AND_ADMISSIBILITY_IN_COU
RT/links/617637350be8ec17a9292b44/FORENSIC-PODIATRY-EVIDENCE-AND-
ADMISSIBILITY-IN-COURT.pdf
Yahya, M. A., Shariff, A. A. M., & Saifuddin, S. (2023). Application Of Principles Of Chain Of Evidence And Chain Of Custody During Storage And Forensic Examination Of Electronic Documentary Evidence In Shariah Criminal Cases In Malaysia.
IIUM Law
14
Journal
,
31
(S1), 143-164. https://journals.iium.edu.my/iiumlj/index.php/iiumlj/article/download/874/418