Case Study 5
pdf
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Humber College *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
MGT1211
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Dec 6, 2023
Type
Pages
4
Uploaded by MajorEaglePerson1008
APPLIED CAPSTONE
Case Study 5
Name: Bhavya Domadia (220096921)
G. G. Toys
Introduction:
G.G Toys is a well-known producer of high-quality, long-lasting dolls. The firm immediately
became a well-known doll supplier, allowing it to establish a considerable position in the toy
industry. It is well-known for its distinctive designs and has two independent manufacturing
facilities. The business's signature product, the "Geoffrey Doll," swept the market, building a
strong base in the US markets and driving the company to domination. The firm then went on to
produce "Specialty Dolls," which are more personalized versions of their Geoffrey Dolls. It
enabled the business to demand a larger premium for the doll than it otherwise would have.
Despite higher production costs, G.G. Toys maintained the same pricing for Geoffrey dolls,
leading them to focus primarily on Specialty Dolls.
Problem Statement:
What strategies could GG Toys employ to boost profitability in light of increased manufacturing
costs and declining product margins? Can GG Toys afford to expand its current product line as
profit margins drop year after year?
Question 1:
Do you recommend that G.G. Toys change its existing cost system in the Chicago
Plant? In the Springfield plant? Why or why not?
Computation of OVH Cost per Unit
OVH Cost Pool
Unit
Total Cost
Capacity
Cost Per Unit
Plant
Management
&
Facilities
Production Units
40000
27000
1.48
Machine Related
Machine Hours
112000
11200
10
Production Order
related
Number
of
production runs
63000
161
391.3
Set Up Labour
Related
Number
of
productions Set ups
13333
160
83.33
Packaging
&
Shipping
Number
of
Shipments
53000
350
151.42
G.G Toys should switch to activity-based costing in its Chicago factory since the business now
employs a proportion of production-run direct labor expenses as the main cost driver. However,
unlike the Springfield facility, which makes only one product, cradles, the Chicago plant creates
a wide range of things, thus this is not the suitable method. Changing the costing method to ABC
is acceptable since the company's overhead expenses are mostly determined by direct labor costs,
and different types of dolls demand different machine hours, setups, production runs, and so on.
Using ABC, each type of doll will have a different manufacturing overhead, resulting in a
different contribution margin.
Question 2:
Calculate the cost of a Geoffrey doll, the speciality branded doll #106, and a cradle
using the cost study conclusions.
Cost of a Geoffrey Doll, Speciality branded doll and a Cradle
Costs
Geoffrey Doll
Speciality Branded
Doll #106
Cradle
Direct Labor Cost
3
3.75
7.5
Direct Materials
5
6
12
Manufacturing Overhead
Cost
7.33
24.69
4.15
Total Cost per unit
15.33
34.44
23.65
According to the table estimates, the Geoffrey doll costs $15.335 per unit, the specialty-branded
doll costs $34.442, and the cradle costs $23.654.
Allocation of Overhead Cost to the Products
Overhead Costs
Geoffrey Dolls
Speciality
Branded
Doll #106
Cradles
Machine Related
37500
12000
0
Plant
Management
and facilities
11250
6000
4500
Set
Up
Labour
related
833
8330
0
Production
Order
related
3913
39130
391.3
Packaging
And
Shipping
1514
33308
7570
Total
Allocated
Overhead
55010
98768
12461.30
Units Produced
7500
7500
4000
Cost of Overhead per
unit
7.33
24.69
4.15
Question 3:
Compare and contrast the profitability of each doll under the new and old systems.
Based on your recomputed product costs, what actions would you recommend the company
consider to enhance its profitability? What additional information would you like to have to
make these recommendations?
Costs (Old System)
Geoffrey Doll
Speciality Branded
Doll
Cradles
Total Cost Per Unit
19.9
23.74
23.72
Gross Profit Margin %
9%
34%
21%
Costs (New System)
Geoffrey Doll
Speciality Branded
Doll
Cradles
Total Cost Per Unit
15.33
34.44
23.65
Gross Profit Margin %
27%
4.33%
21%
Because the gross margin remains constant at 21%, the previous costing approach is enough for
cradle manufacturing in the Springfield facility. Nonetheless, the findings for Geoffrey dolls and
Specialty branded dolls differ under ABC pricing. Geoffrey dolls had a 9% profit margin under
previous costs. ABC costs, on the other hand, has a about 27% gross margin. This is especially
true because too many overhead resources were previously committed to Geoffrey dolls, which
are no longer necessary. The margin for specialized dolls is 34% under the current approach,
however ABC costing shows that it is just about 4.33%.
These calculations show that Geoffrey
dolls outperform Specialty dolls. As a result, additional Geoffrey dolls should be produced.
Question 4:
How should G.G. Toys account for the excess capacity created to produce the
holiday reindeer dolls? Qualitatively, how will this impact your calculated cost of the Geoffrey
doll and the speciality branded dolls in the question 2? Explain your method and its impact.
With the increased capacity obtained during the Christmas reindeer doll manufacturing in July,
August, and September, more Geoffrey dolls and big orders of specialty-branded dolls could be
produced. If the number of dolls produced grows, the fixed cost per unit will decrease. As a
result, the overall cost of the product will be decreased.
To make advantage of the extra capacity,
a new product line might be formed to produce in large quantities while cutting fixed costs. The
opportunity cost technique may be used to quantify the total cost of unused capacity. The
overhead cost for these dolls will be affected if seasonal reindeer dolls are put in the same pricing
pools as Geoffrey and specialty-branded dolls. The cost per driver unit of each cost pool will be
established and multiplied by the cost driver per unit of a certain doll with the driver units. Then
we'd sum them all up to obtain the total cost of each doll.
To calculate the overhead cost per unit
for a certain doll, multiply the total cost by the number of units produced.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Question 5:
What explains the difference between forecasted and actual revenue for the
Chicago plant during March of 2000? What other information would you collect to help explain
this difference?
The disparity in income numbers for the Chicago factory in March 2000 might be attributed to
the firm selling more units of a certain product than projected. A higher-priced product may also
have sold in greater quantities. To arrive at a clear result, we must compare the expected sales
income for all product lines accruing to the Chicago plant with the actual sales figures for each
product line throughout the fiscal year.
Question 6:
Do you recommend G.G. Toys produce the Romaine Patch doll? Why or why not?
We have 2 alternative situations in this case:
If the company purchases materials for Romaine Patch doll or
If the company uses scrap material from the production of other dolls.
Direct Material Purchased
Using Scrap Material
Sales price per unit
8
8
Direct Material cost
6
0
Direct Labour cost
3
3
Contribution Margin
-1
5
As a result, because the contribution margin is good, the corporation can contemplate producing
Romaine patch dolls using spare material from the creation of other doll pajamas.
Conclusion:
G.G Toys must implement an Activity-Based Costing system at its Chicago factory due to the
variety of items it makes. This will help with the proper distribution of overhead costs. It is
proposed that the firm change its sales mix, as making more Geoffrey dolls results in a better
profit margin. Furthermore, idle capacity generated by the manufacture of festive reindeer dolls
should be used to maximize revenue.