G.G TOYS
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
York University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
CAPSTONE
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
11
Uploaded by ConstableEchidnaPerson1055
G.G. Toys
Introduction
G.G Toys is one of the renowned manufacturers of high quality, durable dolls which is popular
for its distinctive designs in U.S. It has two different manufacturing plant, The Chicago and the
Springfield plant. With it’s signature product, “Geoffrey Doll”, the company built a strong
foundation in the U.S market. However, due to the rising production cost of Geoffrey Doll, G.G
toys were experiencing diminishing margins. To maintain their market stability in the competitive market, they again expanded their line by
producing “Specialty dolls” customized by their customers in retail store. With this, they were
able to make more revenues by charging higher price, however, time and effort it required was
also high for this which increased their cost by the time.
Problem Statement
What approaches should G.G. Toys take to deal with rising production costs and boost their gross
profit margin?
Questions
Do you recommend that G.G. Toys change its existing cost system in the Chicago plant?
In the Springfield plant? Why or why not?
Do you recommend that G.G. Toys change its existing cost system in the Chicago plant? In the Springfield plant? Why or why not?
Do you recommend that G.G. Toys change its existing cost
system in the Chicago plant? In the Springfield plant? Why or why not?
Do you recommend that G.G. Toys change its existing cost system in the Chicago plant? In the Springfield plant? Why or why not?
1.
Do you recommend that G.G. Toys change its existing cost system in the Chicago plant? In the Springfield plant? Why or why not?
Computation of OVH cost per unit
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
OVH cost pool
Unit
Total Cost (exhibit 1)
Capacity (Exhibit 4)
Cost/Unit
Machine Related
Machine hrs
112000
112000
10
Plant Management and Facilities
Production Hrs
40000
27000
1.48
Set up Labour Related
No. of Production setup
13333
160
83.33
Production order Related
No. of Production runs
63000
161
391.3
Packaging & Shipping
No. of shipments
53000
350
151.42
Allocation of OVH cost to the Products.
OVH costs
Geoffrey Doll
Specialty Branded
Doll
Cradles
Machine Related
37500
12000
0
Plant Management and Facilities
11250
6000
4500
Set up Labour Related
833
8330
0
Production order Related
3913
39130
391.3
Packaging & Shipping
1514
33308
7570
Total Allocated OVH
55010
98768
12461.30
Unit Produced
7500
4000
3000
Cost of OVH per Unit
7.33
24.692
4.15
Currently, the company use production run direct labor costs to drive the total cost. This is
appropriate when there is a single product as like Springfield plant. However, since the Chicago
Plant manufacture two different products, Activity Based Costing would be the appropriate
costing method for Chicago. This is because each activity would require the different machine
time, setups, and labor costs. So, each type of doll receives a different allocation of
manufacturing overhead using ABC, resulting in different contribution margins.
Calculate the cost of a Geoffrey doll, the specialty-branded doll #106, and a cradle using the cost study conclusions.
Calculate the cost of a Geoffrey doll, the specialty-branded doll #106, and a cradle using the cost study conclusions.
Calculate the cost of a Geoffrey doll, the
specialty-branded doll #106, and a cradle using the cost study conclusions
2. Calculate the cost of a Geoffrey doll, the specialty-branded doll #106, and a cradle using the cost study conclusions.
Computation of Cost using ABC
Costs
Geoffrey Dolls
Specialty branded Dolls
Cradles
Direct Labor Cost
3
3.757.5
7.5
Direct Material Cost
5
6
12
Manufacturing OVH Cost
7.33
24.70
4.15
Total Cost Per Unit
15.34
34.44
23.65
Compare and contrast the profitability of each doll under the new and old systems. Based on your recomputed product
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
costs, what actions would
you recommend the company consider to enhance its profitability? What additional information would you like to have to make these recommendations
Compare and contrast the profitability of each doll under the new and old systems. Based on your recomputed product
costs, what actions would
you recommend the company consider to enhance its profitability? What additional information would you like to have to make these recommendations
3. Compare and contrast the profitability of each doll under the new and old systems. Based on your recomputed product costs, what actions would you recommend the company
consider to enhance its profitability? What additional information would you like to have to make these recommendations.
Computation of Gross Margin using ABC
Geoffrey Dolls
Specialty branded Dolls
Cradles
Total Cost Per Unit
15.34
34.44
23.65
Selling Price 21
36
30
Gross Margin $
5.66
1.56
6.35
Gross Margin %
26.95%
4.33%
21.17%
Computation of Gross Margin under Old system
Total Cost Per Unit
19.19
23.74
23.72
Gross Margin %
9%
34%
21%
Cradles results the same Gross margin regardless of the different Costing approaches, so using
the traditional system is fair in the case of Cradle. Considering the Gross Margin of Geoffrey
Dolls using ABC method, G.G Toys should switch its costing method to ABC. Geoffrey dolls
was allocated too many overheads that were actually not required and that was the major reason
behind getting the margin of only 9% before. So, ultimately Geoffrey performed well even better
than Specialty branded dolls as the margin of Specialty branded dolls under ABC is only 4%
while it is 34% under traditional system. Hence, the company should increase the production of
Geoffrey dolls to enjoy more profits. In case of Specialty branded dolls, since the demand is higher, it has the potential to gain profit
so it is not recommended to stop the production even though the margin under ABC is very less.
Rather, to boost profit, company can take large number of orders and allocate fixed costs to those
items cut down on production's overall overhead costs and boost profits.
How should G.G. Toys
account for the excess
capacity
created
to
produce the holiday reindeer
dolls?
Qualitatively, how will
this
impact
your
calculated cost of the
Geoffrey
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
doll and the specialty-
branded dolls in question
number 2? Explain your
method and its impact. 4. How should G.G. Toys account for the excess capacity created to produce the holiday
reindeer dolls? Qualitatively, how will this impact your calculated cost of the Geoffrey doll
and the specialty-branded dolls in question number 2? Explain your method and its
impact. G.G Toys can account the extra capacity created to manufacture the holiday reindeer dolls for the
purpose producing more Geoffrey dolls and Specialty dolls. This will result in efficient resource
use, increased productivity, and a reduction in fixed costs, which will lower overall overhead
costs.
Adding more product line and using the same allocated cost as before would again result in false
outcome. So, opportunity cost needs to be taken into consideration in order to find the actual cost
of unused capacity. To determine the cost of producing a single reindeer doll, you need to calculate the cost driver
for each cost pool by multiplying the cost per driver unit with the driver units. By adding up all
the cost drivers, you can determine the total cost. Finally, you can find the per-unit overhead cost
of the reindeer doll by dividing the total cost by the number of dolls produced.
5. What explains the difference between forecasted and actual revenue for the Chicago
plant during March of 2000? What other information would you collect to help explain this
difference? The major difference occurred in the forecasted revenue and the actual revenue is because of the
differences in the cost of labor, amount of raw materials, and also the inappropriate way of
deriving cost while anticipating overhead cost. Moreover, the actual production unit is fewer than
anticipated, while the actual revenue is more than expected one. This might be the result of dolls
being sold for more than was planned or because dolls with higher prices were bought more
frequently than dolls with lower prices.
6. Do you recommend G.G. Toys produce the Romaine Patch doll? Why or why not?
Although the Romaine Patch doll is expected to run at a loss considering $8 as setup price with
total of $9 overhead cost( material cost- $6 and labor cost- $3) , I would recommend G.G toys to
produce the Romaine Patch doll because the production can use the 20% scrap material obtained
from Pajamas material to manufacture the doll and reduce the material cost by almost 80%. This
will lead the company to gain profit from the production of Romaine Patch doll. Conclusions and Recommendations
Given its wide range of products, G.G. Toys must use the Activity-Based Costing Method to
determine its true overhead costs for its Chicago operation. The corporation should prioritise
creating more Geoffrey dolls because they have a better profit margin than other dolls. In a same
vein, given the increased market need, they also shouldn't stop making specialty dolls. Also, the
extra capacity generated by the Reindeer doll can be completely utilised by creating more
Geoffrey and Specialty dolls, and the scrap goods can be used to make Romaine Patch dolls in
order to fully utilize the available resources and increase profitability.