ISE 620 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
docx
keyboard_arrow_up
School
Southern New Hampshire University *
*We aren’t endorsed by this school
Course
620
Subject
Industrial Engineering
Date
Feb 20, 2024
Type
docx
Pages
4
Uploaded by MegaMoosePerson1067
ISE 620 Milestone One Guidelines and Rubric
Overview:
As you are now discovering, forming an incident response team with assigned roles and responsibilities is essential for an organization
that intends to handle security incidents in an effective and efficient manner while protecting key assets when possible. In this milestone, you will draft section II.A (incident response process with key roles and responsibilities assignments) of the final project. Review the Final Project Guidelines and Rubric document to see how this milestone fits in the overall project. Also review the Final Project Scenario
and Final Project Support
documents, which include key information necessary to completing the draft. Use the table below to complete your documentation of the process by filling in the open sections. This will result in a logical progression of steps to be used in incident response. Please note: If it is cumbersome to use the table below, you may draft this milestone in a separate document. However, you are required to include all the element in the criteria listed below. You will note that the rubric for this milestone activity is somewhat different, in that it is designed for you to have the opportunity to submit a draft of your work and receive valuable feedback for improving on it. The Final Project Rubric will require a higher level of performance.
Prompt: Specifically, the following critical elements
must be addressed:
A.
Incident Response Process with Key Roles and Responsibilities Assignments:
Use the table below to format your answers to the following questions. If the table is too cumbersome, you may create your own. However, your completed table must reflect all the required information, addressing the steps within the full flow of a potential attack as well as the key roles and responsibilities necessary
for detecting and responding to the provided incident types.
i.
Identify a
logical sequence of steps
stakeholders should take for addressing the scenario. For example, who should do what within the process?
ii.
Articulate the rationale behind the assignment of the roles and responsibilities
for these steps. Ensure you address implementation concerns in your rationale.
Incident Process Response: Steps, Key Roles, and Responsibilities Assignments
Identify individual steps Identify the role and who Identify your rationale behind the assignment, ensuring you address implementation
and list them in logical sequence below:
performs it below, ensuring it corresponds to the step in
the first column in the table:
concerns related to the step and the role/responsibility in the first two columns in the table:
Detection
Step
Role/Responsibility
Rationale Behind Assignment
Response
Step:
Role/Responsibility
Rationale Behind Assignment
Communication and Reporting
Step:
Role/Responsibility
Rationale Behind Assignment
Prevention
Step:
Role/Responsibility
Rationale Behind Assignment
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
- Access to all documents
- Unlimited textbook solutions
- 24/7 expert homework help
Rubric
Guidelines for Submission:
You should submit the template above (or a comparable version with all the same information) in a Microsoft Word document with 12-point Times New Roman font. Use a file name that includes the course code, assignment title, and your name—for example, ISE_620_Milestone_One_Keisha_Jones.docx.
Critical Elements
Proficient (100%)
Needs Improvement (70%) Not Evident (0%)
Value
Logical Sequence of
Steps
Identifies a logical sequence of steps stakeholders will take for addressing the scenario, with minimal or no gaps in clarity, logic, or detail
Addresses “Proficient” criteria, but there are significant gaps in clarity, logic, or detail
Does not address critical element, or response is irrelevant
40
Roles and
Responsibilities
Articulates rationale behind the assignment
of the roles and responsibilities for these steps, and addresses implementation concerns with minimal or no gaps in clarity, logic, or detail
Addresses “Proficient” criteria, but there are significant gaps in clarity, logic, or detail
Does not address critical element, or response is irrelevant
40
Articulation of
Response
Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or organization
Submission has some errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas
Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas
20
Total
100%