National Contradiction Unveiling the Pervasive Economic Interests in Slavery Across America.

docx

School

Yale University *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

MISC

Subject

History

Date

Nov 24, 2024

Type

docx

Pages

5

Uploaded by GrandBat3229

Report
1 National Contradiction: Unveiling the Pervasive Economic Interests in Slavery Across America. Instructions Historians increasingly note that slavery was a “national contradiction, not a southern peculiarity.” By this, they mean that slavery had a national reach and that all areas of the country had an economic interest in slavery. Based on the readings, do you agree or disagree with this statement and why? Books to Cite: (Must Cite These Works) Edward Baptist - The Half Has Never Been Told Charles Dew - Apostles of Disunion Michael Adams - Living Hell
2 The Economics of Slavery Name of student Institution affiliation Name of professor Course D ate Basing on the economic interest of slavery in the country's economic development, historians argued that slavery was not a Southern peculiarity but rather a national contradiction. All the areas of the country had economic interest through the practice of slavery. I agree with the argument by historians that slavery had a national reach due to some defenders concerning the nation's economy. Some of the defenders for economic of slavery involve social good, humanitarianism, religion, and economics itself of the nation of America. This paper discusses the agreement on the economics of slavery in the development of the countries' economies.
3 In agreement with the historian’s statement concerning slavery as a driver for national development and economy, American prosperity resulted from the slavery economy. The Southern planters were mainly slaves; they were responsible for the bulk wealth produced in the nations. At the time, slavery was legal, accepted socially, and rally in the colonies; as a result, more jobs were created, and there was an improvement of the economies in America. Trade was developed due to the labor provided by slaves in the plantations in the production of raw materials and other products for sale in the markets. Major consumer goods were produced from slave labor and thus became the basis of trade in the nineteenth and the eighteenth centuries. 1 . Goods such as sugar, cotton, tobacco, rum, and coffee were produced from their cheap labor of slaves. They enabled the development of trade and the improvements of the economy of the South and other places in America. There were arguments that there would be widespread chaos and even unemployment if slavery came to a sudden end in the South. There would so much negative impact if slavery came to an end. The foundation of the Southern economy depended and mainly relied on labor that slaves provided. If slavery were to be topped at the time, the cotton industries in the South would be stopped due to the lack of labor at the plantations. 2 . The economy will collapse due to the unavailability of the labor required at the fields, plantations, and even at the factories. The profits from the rice fields would cease in the Southern economy, and there would be loss as tobacco crops will dry in the fields. This will adversely affect the economy of the South and every country that relies on slavery for development. 1 Engerman, Stanley L. "Review of The Business of Slavery and the Rise of American Capitalism, 1815-1860 by Calvin Schermerhorn and The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism by Edward E. Baptist." Journal of Economic Literature 55, no. 2 (2017): 637-43. 2 Dew, Charles B. Apostles of disunion: southern secession commissioners and the causes of the Civil War . University of Virginia Press, 2017.
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
4 Another reason to defend slavery as a national contradiction, as a driver for the national economy, is that slavery is the natural state of humanity, and it has existed throughout the history of humanity. The English had slaves until recently, the Romans and Greeks had slaves, and they helped develop their county's economy. Slaves were better cared for, according to the defenders that were defending slavery for the rise of the nation's economy. A comparison of the Northern States versus poor Europe proved how slaves were taken care of. 3 . When the slaves became sick, they were assisted by their owners, who knew their values for the economy. Even in the instances where slaves needed support and protection, they were granted by their masters; the aged were taken good care of. This is unlike the ones who become helpless after being fired and the economy of the nations dropped gradually in their absence. To conclude, slavery played a critical role in developing the United States, Southern States, and even the European States. Half of the earnings of the government were from slavery economic. Industries in Europe developed from slavery provision of raw materials. Businesses developed in the South due to slavery in cotton production and the services that the slaves provided. The services from slaves enabled the development of textile industries, shippers, insurance corporations, cotton brokers, and even processing factories in the South. From the above discussion, it is evident that slavery impacted the development of the national economy of the countries. 3 Adams, Michael CC. Living hell: The dark side of the Civil War . JHU Press, 2014.
5 References Engerman, Stanley L. "Review of The Business of Slavery and the Rise of American Capitalism, 1815-1860 by Calvin Schermerhorn and The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism by Edward E. Baptist." Journal of Economic Literature 55, no. 2 (2017): 637-43. Dew, Charles B. Apostles of disunion: southern secession commissioners and the causes of the Civil War . University of Virginia Press, 2017. Adams, Michael CC. Living hell: The dark side of the Civil War . JHU Press, 2014.