104_Lab_9_Earthquakes_Response_Form

doc

School

University Of Hartford *

*We aren’t endorsed by this school

Course

MISC

Subject

Geology

Date

Apr 3, 2024

Type

doc

Pages

10

Uploaded by PresidentFogButterfly70

Report
Lake Michigan College Physical Geology 104/290 Name: ____________________ Lab Exercise 9 - Earthquakes Background Information: The Loma Prieta Earthquake As millions of Americans were tuned in to the beginning of the third game of the World Series (championship baseball) at Candlestick Park, San Francisco, California, on October 17, 1989, a large earthquake occurred. It was the largest to strike the San Francisco Bay region, home to almost 6 million people, since the great earthquake of 1906, when fewer than a million people lived there. The earthquake was felt over 400,000 square miles and resulted in 67 deaths; 12,000 people were left homeless and it caused $6 billion in property damage. In terms of cost, it was one of the most expensive natural disasters ever in the United States, and it was the most costly earthquake since 1906. The following problems illustrate how the epicenter was located, how the magnitude and intensities were determined, how the intensity was influenced by the nature of the surficial material, and how energy from the earthquake could be used to view the interior of the Earth. In each case, the scientific method is used to answer the basic problems. Problems: 1. Geoscientists and engineers commonly simulate earthquakes in the laboratory to observe their effects on models of constructions sites, buildings, bridges, and so on. Soil in broad terms for foundation engineering is the ground supporting a structure. Soil is considered to be any loose sedimentary deposit, such as gravel, sand, silt, clay or a mixture of these materials. Coarser grained, well-sorted materials are more permeable to water and will shift when dry or saturated. Damp sand grains will stick together (as when building sandcastles), but when subjected to an earthquake will be subject to liquefaction. Watch the two videos below: Example of Liquefaction ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=afBqD8Hm2Ak ) Liquefaction animation ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=536xSZ_XkSs ) a. What happens to buildings on bedrock (equivalent to poorly-sorted, consolidated soils) during an earthquake? b. What happens to buildings on poorly consolidated soils during an earthquake? 1
Lake Michigan College Physical Geology 104/290 c. What happens to buildings on saturated soils sediment during an earthquake? d. Which kind of Earth material is more hazardous to build on in earthquake prone regions: compacted sediment or uncompacted sediment? Explain your reasoning. e. Consider the moist, compacted beach sand in the first video. Do you think this material would be a choice to build on? Explain your reasoning. f. Write a brief statement that summarizes how water in a sandy substrate beneath a home can be beneficial or hazardous. Justify your reasoning by referencing the videos you viewed. 2
Lake Michigan College Physical Geology 104/290 2. Look at the figure of the three simulated seismograms from the October 17, 1989, Loma Prieta Earthquake (Fig. 9- next page). Each was recorded at a different seismic station. Show your work for full credit. a. Specifically, where was the epicenter? (1) Find the differences in arrival time between P and S using Fig. 1. Next determine the distance to the epicenter from the three stations using the travel-time curves in Fig. 2. Distance from epicenter of: Station A: ______________ Station B: ______________ Station C: ______________ (2) Plot the locations of the stations on Fig. 3. See the caption for Fig. 3 for station locations. (3) Locate the epicenter of the earthquake on Fig. 3 from intersecting circles centered at the three stations. Note that your epicenter and another student’s may not be the same. Why? b. When did the earthquake occur? (1) Use the travel time curves and the time values indicated on the seismograms to determine the time of occurrence. (2) The time you determined is Universal Coordinate Time. What time would it have been in the Pacific Daylight time zone ? c. How big was the earthquake? Determine the Richter magnitude from the seismograms using the method shown in Fig. 4 below. 3
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Lake Michigan College Physical Geology 104/290 Figure 1. Three seismographs for Problem 2. Vertical tick marks on the seismographs are one minute apart. The Universal Coordinate Times given below the lower seismograph also apply to the upper to seismograms (e.g., the P wave arrived at Station A between 00:05 and 00:06). Because Universal Coordinate Time is based on a 24-hour day, 00:05 is the same as 12:05 am. Determine the differences in arrival times between the P and S waves at the recording stations. We will use these values in Fig. 2 to obtain the distances to the epicenter. Station A: ___________ Station B: ___________ Station C: ___________ 4
Lake Michigan College Physical Geology 104/290 Figure 2. Travel time curves for P and S waves. The enlargement of Fig. 4 has the same time scale as the seismograms in Fig. 1 and is to be used for Problem 2. Record the distances from the epicenter to the recording stations. Station A ________ Station B _________ Station C _________ 5
Lake Michigan College Physical Geology 104/290 Figure 3. Map for Problem 1. Plot stations A (lat 40º08’N, long 121º30’W), B (lat 34º08’N, long 118º00’W), and C (lat 41º00’N, long 114º30’W). Then locate the epicenter using the distances from the epicenter obtained from Fig. 2. 6
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Lake Michigan College Physical Geology 104/290 Figure 4. Scale for determining Richter magnitude of an earthquake. 3. Questionnaires designed for assigning Modified Mercalli scale intensities to the October 17 earthquake were returned from the locations shown on Fig. 5. The responses were divided into five groups (see Table below). Using these responses, assign Modified Mercalli Scale intensities to the five groups, using Table 1 (on the last page of this lab) as a guide. Next, draw isoseismals on the map of San Francisco, based on intensity distribution. How does the area of highest intensity compare with the epicenter you located in Problem 2? 7
Lake Michigan College Physical Geology 104/290 Earthquake Intensity Survey Questionnaire Category Descriptions Modified Mercalli Scale Equivalents A. Felt by all, and people were extremely frightened. Drivers had great difficulty controlling vehicles. Some buildings collapsed, others very seriously damaged. Concrete bridge collapsed. Smell of gas in some areas. Ground cracked. B. Felt by all, most people were frightened. Drivers had some difficulty steering. Some reasonably well-built buildings partially collapsed, poorly built buildings badly damaged. Some water towers damaged. Large trees had tops broken. Some reports of furniture and people being thrown in air. Cracks in ground. C. Felt by all, some people knocked down. Noticed by drivers. Damage to buildings moderate, expect for those of poor construction. Windows broken, thinks knocked off shelves, plaster walls damaged. Trees and bushes shook. Caving noticed on some steep hillsides and along stream banks. D. Felt by all, some had trouble walking. Not noticed by most drivers. Damage to structures slight, but windows broken, things knocked off shelves, pictures knocked off walls. Plaster walls cracked. E. Felt by most people. Water in swimming pools disturbed. Some reported broken glassware. Pendulum clocks stopped. 8
Lake Michigan College Physical Geology 104/290 Figure 5. Map of San Francisco Bay area showing locations for which intensities have been assigned. Letters A through E correspond to earthquake intensities described in the above table. For use with Problem 3. 9
Your preview ends here
Eager to read complete document? Join bartleby learn and gain access to the full version
  • Access to all documents
  • Unlimited textbook solutions
  • 24/7 expert homework help
Lake Michigan College Physical Geology 104/290 Table 1. Modified Mercalli Scale. 10